BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25924124)

  • 1. The impact of programmatic assessment on student learning: theory versus practice.
    Heeneman S; Oudkerk Pool A; Schuwirth LW; van der Vleuten CP; Driessen EW
    Med Educ; 2015 May; 49(5):487-98. PubMed ID: 25924124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Peer assessment in medical communication skills training in programmatic assessment: A qualitative study examining faculty and student perceptions.
    Dohms MC; Rocha A; Rasenberg E; Dielissen P; Thoonen B
    Med Teach; 2024 Jun; 46(6):823-831. PubMed ID: 38157436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The reliability and validity of a portfolio designed as a programmatic assessment of performance in an integrated clinical placement.
    Roberts C; Shadbolt N; Clark T; Simpson P
    BMC Med Educ; 2014 Sep; 14():197. PubMed ID: 25240385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Between trust and control: Teachers' assessment conceptualisations within programmatic assessment.
    Schut S; Heeneman S; Bierer B; Driessen E; van Tartwijk J; van der Vleuten C
    Med Educ; 2020 Jun; 54(6):528-537. PubMed ID: 31998987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A qualitative study examining the critical differences in the experience of and response to formative feedback by undergraduate medical students in Japan and the UK.
    Kozato A; Shikino K; Matsuyama Y; Hayashi M; Kondo S; Uchida S; Stanyon M; Ito S
    BMC Med Educ; 2023 Jun; 23(1):408. PubMed ID: 37277728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Characterizing Student Perceptions of and Buy-In toward Common Formative Assessment Techniques.
    Brazeal KR; Brown TL; Couch BA
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2016; 15(4):. PubMed ID: 27909023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Students' perceptions of post-exam feedback in oral radiology-A comparative study from two dental hygienist educational settings.
    de Lange T; Møystad A; Torgersen G; Ahlqvist J; Jäghagen EL
    Eur J Dent Educ; 2024 May; 28(2):377-387. PubMed ID: 37885281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The mechanism of impact of summative assessment on medical students' learning.
    Cilliers FJ; Schuwirth LW; Adendorff HJ; Herman N; van der Vleuten CP
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2010 Dec; 15(5):695-715. PubMed ID: 20455078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Risky business: medical students' feedback-seeking behaviours: a mixed methods study.
    Spooner M; Reinhardt C; Boland F; McConkey S; Pawlikowska T
    Med Educ Online; 2024 Dec; 29(1):2330259. PubMed ID: 38529848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perceived educational impact of the medical student long case: a qualitative study.
    Tey C; Chiavaroli N; Ryan A
    BMC Med Educ; 2020 Aug; 20(1):257. PubMed ID: 32767981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A model of the pre-assessment learning effects of summative assessment in medical education.
    Cilliers FJ; Schuwirth LW; Herman N; Adendorff HJ; van der Vleuten CP
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2012 Mar; 17(1):39-53. PubMed ID: 21461880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Does 'summative' count? The influence of the awarding of study credits on feedback use and test-taking motivation in medical progress testing.
    van Wijk EV; van Blankenstein FM; Donkers J; Janse RJ; Bustraan J; Adelmeijer LGM; Dubois EA; Dekker FW; Langers AMJ
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38502460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Programmatic Assessment of Clinical Reasoning: New Opportunities to Meet an Ongoing Challenge.
    Torre D; Daniel M; Ratcliffe T; Durning SJ; Holmboe E; Schuwirth L
    Teach Learn Med; 2024 May; ():1-9. PubMed ID: 38794865
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Identifying Medical Students in Difficulty Using Integration of Programmatic Assessment and Real-Time Evaluation Framework.
    Warraich KF; Baqai S
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2024 Apr; 34(4):504. PubMed ID: 38576302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Theoretical considerations on programmatic assessment.
    Torre DM; Schuwirth LWT; Van der Vleuten CPM
    Med Teach; 2020 Feb; 42(2):213-220. PubMed ID: 31622126
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stakes in the eye of the beholder: an international study of learners' perceptions within programmatic assessment.
    Schut S; Driessen E; van Tartwijk J; van der Vleuten C; Heeneman S
    Med Educ; 2018 Jun; 52(6):654-663. PubMed ID: 29572920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Validity evidence for programmatic assessment in competency-based education.
    Bok HGJ; de Jong LH; O'Neill T; Maxey C; Hecker KG
    Perspect Med Educ; 2018 Dec; 7(6):362-372. PubMed ID: 30430439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of clinical competence in competency-based education.
    Chimea T; Kanji Z; Schmitz S
    Can J Dent Hyg; 2020 Jun; 54(2):83-91. PubMed ID: 33240368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Where the rubber meets the road - An integrative review of programmatic assessment in health care professions education.
    Schut S; Maggio LA; Heeneman S; van Tartwijk J; van der Vleuten C; Driessen E
    Perspect Med Educ; 2021 Jan; 10(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 33085060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Exploring the connections between programmatic assessment and program evaluation within competency-based medical education programs.
    Moreau KA
    Med Teach; 2021 Mar; 43(3):250-252. PubMed ID: 33136458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.