These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

307 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25924124)

  • 21. How do students' perceptions of research and approaches to learning change in undergraduate research?
    Imafuku R; Saiki T; Kawakami C; Suzuki Y
    Int J Med Educ; 2015 Apr; 6():47-55. PubMed ID: 25863495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Early identification of 'at-risk' students by the parents of paediatric patients.
    O'Keefe M; Whitham J
    Med Educ; 2005 Sep; 39(9):958-65. PubMed ID: 16150037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Assessment for learning: experience in an undergraduate medical theoretical course].
    Pérez G; Kattan E; Collins L; Wright AC; Rybertt T; González A; Sirhan M; Solís N; Pizarro M; Arrese M; Sarfatis A; Lustig N; Arab JP; Labarca J; Riquelme A
    Rev Med Chil; 2015 Mar; 143(3):329-36. PubMed ID: 26005819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Why are medical students 'checking out' of active learning in a new curriculum?
    White C; Bradley E; Martindale J; Roy P; Patel K; Yoon M; Worden MK
    Med Educ; 2014 Mar; 48(3):315-24. PubMed ID: 24528466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The use of programmatic assessment in the clinical workplace: a Maastricht case report.
    Driessen EW; van Tartwijk J; Govaerts M; Teunissen P; van der Vleuten CP
    Med Teach; 2012; 34(3):226-31. PubMed ID: 22364455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Web-based feedback after summative assessment: how do students engage?
    Harrison CJ; Könings KD; Molyneux A; Schuwirth LW; Wass V; van der Vleuten CP
    Med Educ; 2013 Jul; 47(7):734-44. PubMed ID: 23746163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. In-training assessment: qualitative study of effects on supervision and feedback in an undergraduate clinical rotation.
    Daelmans HE; Overmeer RM; van der Hem-Stokroos HH; Scherpbier AJ; Stehouwer CD; van der Vleuten CP
    Med Educ; 2006 Jan; 40(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 16441323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Tensions in post-examination feedback: information for learning versus potential for harm.
    Ryan A; McColl GJ; O'Brien R; Chiavaroli N; Judd T; Finch S; Swanson D
    Med Educ; 2017 Sep; 51(9):963-973. PubMed ID: 28833428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The process of feedback in workplace-based assessment: organisation, delivery, continuity.
    Pelgrim EA; Kramer AW; Mokkink HG; van der Vleuten CP
    Med Educ; 2012 Jun; 46(6):604-12. PubMed ID: 22626052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Exploring the influence of feedback given by people with lived experience of mental distress on learning for preregistration mental health students.
    Stacey G; Pearson M
    J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs; 2018 Jun; 25(5-6):. PubMed ID: 29746012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Which factors, personal or external, most influence students' generation of learning goals?
    Eva KW; Munoz J; Hanson MD; Walsh A; Wakefield J
    Acad Med; 2010 Oct; 85(10 Suppl):S102-5. PubMed ID: 20881690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Students' motives for using online formative assessments when preparing for summative assessments.
    De Kleijn RA; Bouwmeester RA; Ritzen MM; Ramaekers SP; Van Rijen HV
    Med Teach; 2013 Dec; 35(12):e1644-50. PubMed ID: 24050678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Peer assessment in medical communication skills training in programmatic assessment: A qualitative study examining faculty and student perceptions.
    Dohms MC; Rocha A; Rasenberg E; Dielissen P; Thoonen B
    Med Teach; 2024 Jun; 46(6):823-831. PubMed ID: 38157436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Changing the culture of assessment: the dominance of the summative assessment paradigm.
    Harrison CJ; Könings KD; Schuwirth LWT; Wass V; van der Vleuten CPM
    BMC Med Educ; 2017 Apr; 17(1):73. PubMed ID: 28454581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Student perceptions of assessment and feedback in longitudinal integrated clerkships.
    Bates J; Konkin J; Suddards C; Dobson S; Pratt D
    Med Educ; 2013 Apr; 47(4):362-74. PubMed ID: 23488756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Grades in formative workplace-based assessment: a study of what works for whom and why.
    Lefroy J; Hawarden A; Gay SP; McKinley RK; Cleland J
    Med Educ; 2015 Mar; 49(3):307-20. PubMed ID: 25693990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Task- versus ego-oriented feedback delivered as numbers or comments during intubation training.
    Manzone J; Tremblay L; You-Ten KE; Desai D; Brydges R
    Med Educ; 2014 Apr; 48(4):430-40. PubMed ID: 24606626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Medical Student Perceptions of Feedback and Feedback Behaviors Within the Context of the "Educational Alliance".
    Bowen L; Marshall M; Murdoch-Eaton D
    Acad Med; 2017 Sep; 92(9):1303-1312. PubMed ID: 28272114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Certainty-based marking in a formative assessment improves student course appreciation but not summative examination scores.
    Hendriks WJAJ; Bakker N; Pluk H; de Brouwer A; Wieringa B; Cambi A; Zegers M; Wansink DG; Leunissen R; Klaren PHM
    BMC Med Educ; 2019 May; 19(1):178. PubMed ID: 31151456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Student perspectives on programmatic assessment in a large medical programme: A critical realist analysis.
    Roberts C; Khanna P; Bleasel J; Lane S; Burgess A; Charles K; Howard R; O'Mara D; Haq I; Rutzou T
    Med Educ; 2022 Sep; 56(9):901-914. PubMed ID: 35393668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.