These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25924200)

  • 1. Q&A: The global view.
    Dong-Yan J; Cheung F
    Nature; 2015 Apr; 520(7549):S37. PubMed ID: 25924200
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact factors reward and promote excellence.
    Lomnicki A
    Nature; 2003 Jul; 424(6948):487. PubMed ID: 12891329
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact factors: target the funding bodies.
    Insall R
    Nature; 2003 Jun; 423(6940):585. PubMed ID: 12789312
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Peer reviewers need more nurturing.
    Catlow R
    Nature; 2017 Dec; 552(7685):293. PubMed ID: 29293240
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Making an impact.
    Wu R
    Nature; 2004 Mar; 428(6979):206-7. PubMed ID: 15014507
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Citation rate unrelated to journals' impact factors.
    Waheed AA
    Nature; 2003 Dec; 426(6966):495. PubMed ID: 14654813
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Row erupts over university's use of research metrics in job-cut decisions.
    Else H
    Nature; 2021 Apr; 592(7852):19. PubMed ID: 33767466
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Q&A: China still rising.
    Cheetham A; Fleming N
    Nature; 2015 Apr; 520(7549):S34-5. PubMed ID: 25924198
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. NIH responds to critics on peer review.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 2008 Jun; 453(7197):835. PubMed ID: 18548033
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Peer review: recognition via year-end statements.
    van Loon AJ
    Nature; 2003 May; 423(6936):116. PubMed ID: 12736656
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How do impact factors relate to the real world?
    Skórka P
    Nature; 2003 Oct; 425(6959):661. PubMed ID: 14562076
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Post-publication review could aid skills and quality.
    Gibson TA
    Nature; 2007 Jul; 448(7152):408. PubMed ID: 17653166
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Scandals stem from the low priority of peer review.
    Connerade JP
    Nature; 2004 Jan; 427(6971):196. PubMed ID: 14724609
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Watch out for cheats in citation game.
    Biagioli M
    Nature; 2016 Jul; 535(7611):201. PubMed ID: 27411599
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The secrets of success.
    Smaglik P
    Nature; 2004 Nov; 432(7014):253. PubMed ID: 15538377
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Peer-review system could gain from author feedback.
    Korngreen A
    Nature; 2005 Nov; 438(7066):282. PubMed ID: 16292281
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Peer review-Beyond the call of duty?
    Griffiths P; Baveye PC
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2011 Jan; 48(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 20096840
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Academic recruitment in Spain and Italy.
    Gui D; Runfola M; Rossi S; Panunzi S; De Gaetano A
    Science; 2002 Aug; 297(5582):770-1. PubMed ID: 12162319
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Peer review could be improved by market forces.
    Jaffe K
    Nature; 2006 Feb; 439(7078):782. PubMed ID: 16482127
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Future impact: Predicting scientific success.
    Acuna DE; Allesina S; Kording KP
    Nature; 2012 Sep; 489(7415):201-2. PubMed ID: 22972278
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.