These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25924200)

  • 41. Korean scandal will have global fallout.
    Check E; Cyranoski D
    Nature; 2005 Dec; 438(7071):1056-7. PubMed ID: 16371963
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. It's difficult to publish contradictory findings.
    DeCoursey TE
    Nature; 2006 Feb; 439(7078):784. PubMed ID: 16482132
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Gender bias goes away when grant reviewers focus on the science.
    Guglielmi G
    Nature; 2018 Feb; 554(7690):14-15. PubMed ID: 29388971
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Who would you share your funding with?
    Bollen J
    Nature; 2018 Aug; 560(7717):143. PubMed ID: 30089925
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Rising stars.
    Phillips N
    Nature; 2016 Jul; 535(7613):S49. PubMed ID: 27463074
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Metrics market.
    Nature; 2014 Jun; 510(7506):444. PubMed ID: 24971436
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Sitting in judgement.
    Check E
    Nature; 2002 Sep; 419(6905):332-3. PubMed ID: 12353003
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Staying at home.
    Nature; 2011 Aug; 476(7358):5. PubMed ID: 21814236
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Improving science through online commentary.
    Eagleman DM; Holcombe AO
    Nature; 2003 May; 423(6935):15. PubMed ID: 12721598
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Peer review reviewed.
    Nature; 2007 Sep; 449(7159):115. PubMed ID: 17851475
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Science policy: Well-funded investigators should receive extra scrutiny.
    Berg JM
    Nature; 2012 Sep; 489(7415):203. PubMed ID: 22972279
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Confidential reports may improve peer review.
    Cintas P
    Nature; 2004 Mar; 428(6980):255. PubMed ID: 15029169
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Perspective: Give youth a chance.
    Wang CC
    Nature; 2015 Apr; 520(7549):S36. PubMed ID: 25924199
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Artificial intelligence is selecting grant reviewers in China.
    Cyranoski D
    Nature; 2019 May; 569(7756):316-317. PubMed ID: 31089232
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Ratings games.
    Nature; 2005 Aug; 436(7053):889-90. PubMed ID: 16107794
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. West Asia.
    Nature; 2014 Nov; 515(7526):S88-9. PubMed ID: 25390151
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Peer reviews: in praise of referees.
    Altschuler EL
    Nature; 2011 May; 473(7348):452. PubMed ID: 21614062
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Global overview.
    Nature; 2014 Nov; 515(7526):S56-7. PubMed ID: 25390143
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Reviewing should be shown in publication list.
    Clausen T; Nielsen OB
    Nature; 2003 Feb; 421(6924):689. PubMed ID: 12610595
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Chinese reviewers: sign up for unique IDs, please.
    Muñoz-Pinedo C
    Nature; 2019 Jan; 565(7738):161. PubMed ID: 30626954
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.