BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

257 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25925052)

  • 1. A wild bootstrap approach for the selection of biomarkers in early diagnostic trials.
    Zapf A; Brunner E; Konietschke F
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2015 May; 15():43. PubMed ID: 25925052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A modified Wald interval for the area under the ROC curve (AUC) in diagnostic case-control studies.
    Kottas M; Kuss O; Zapf A
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2014 Feb; 14():26. PubMed ID: 24552686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bayesian bootstrap estimation of ROC curve.
    Gu J; Ghosal S; Roy A
    Stat Med; 2008 Nov; 27(26):5407-20. PubMed ID: 18613217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of confidence/credible interval methods for the area under the ROC curve for continuous diagnostic tests with small sample size.
    Feng D; Cortese G; Baumgartner R
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Dec; 26(6):2603-2621. PubMed ID: 26323286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Joint confidence region estimation for area under ROC curve and Youden index.
    Yin J; Tian L
    Stat Med; 2014 Mar; 33(6):985-1000. PubMed ID: 24123069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bootstrap-based procedures for inference in nonparametric receiver-operating characteristic curve regression analysis.
    Rodríguez-Álvarez MX; Roca-Pardiñas J; Cadarso-Suárez C; Tahoces PG
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Mar; 27(3):740-764. PubMed ID: 29233083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On the exact interval estimation for the difference in paired areas under the ROC curves.
    Li CR; Liao CT; Liu JP
    Stat Med; 2008 Jan; 27(2):224-42. PubMed ID: 17139702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Adjustment for measurement error in evaluating diagnostic biomarkers by using an internal reliability sample.
    White MT; Xie SX
    Stat Med; 2013 Nov; 32(27):4709-25. PubMed ID: 23765915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Using confidence intervals to compare several correlated areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves.
    Zou GY; Yue L
    Stat Med; 2013 Dec; 32(29):5077-90. PubMed ID: 23824874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bayesian modeling and inference for diagnostic accuracy and probability of disease based on multiple diagnostic biomarkers with and without a perfect reference standard.
    Jafarzadeh SR; Johnson WO; Gardner IA
    Stat Med; 2016 Mar; 35(6):859-76. PubMed ID: 26415924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. New nonparametric confidence intervals for the Youden index.
    Zhou H; Qin G
    J Biopharm Stat; 2012; 22(6):1244-57. PubMed ID: 23075020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A non-inferiority test for diagnostic accuracy based on the paired partial areas under ROC curves.
    Li CR; Liao CT; Liu JP
    Stat Med; 2008 May; 27(10):1762-76. PubMed ID: 17968858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A smooth ROC curve estimator based on log-concave density estimates.
    Rufibach K
    Int J Biostat; 2012; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 22611590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Tests of equivalence and non-inferiority for diagnostic accuracy based on the paired areas under ROC curves.
    Liu JP; Ma MC; Wu CY; Tai JY
    Stat Med; 2006 Apr; 25(7):1219-38. PubMed ID: 16158400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Nonparametric estimation of ROC curves in the absence of a gold standard.
    Zhou XH; Castelluccio P; Zhou C
    Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):600-9. PubMed ID: 16011710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Predictive inference for best linear combination of biomarkers subject to limits of detection.
    Coolen-Maturi T
    Stat Med; 2017 Aug; 36(18):2844-2874. PubMed ID: 28556298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A new parametric method based on S-distributions for computing receiver operating characteristic curves for continuous diagnostic tests.
    Sorribas A; March J; Trujillano J
    Stat Med; 2002 May; 21(9):1213-35. PubMed ID: 12111875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Measuring and estimating diagnostic accuracy when there are three ordinal diagnostic groups.
    Xiong C; van Belle G; Miller JP; Morris JC
    Stat Med; 2006 Apr; 25(7):1251-73. PubMed ID: 16345029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Empirical likelihood inference for the area under the ROC curve.
    Qin G; Zhou XH
    Biometrics; 2006 Jun; 62(2):613-22. PubMed ID: 16918927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An ROC-type measure of diagnostic accuracy when the gold standard is continuous-scale.
    Obuchowski NA
    Stat Med; 2006 Feb; 25(3):481-93. PubMed ID: 16287217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.