BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25925292)

  • 1. Cost-effectiveness of para-aortic lymphadenectomy before chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer.
    Lee JY; Kim Y; Lee TJ; Jeon YW; Kim K; Chung HH; Kim HJ; Park SM; Kim JW
    J Gynecol Oncol; 2015 Jul; 26(3):171-8. PubMed ID: 25925292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Positron emission tomography/computerised tomography imaging in detecting and managing recurrent cervical cancer: systematic review of evidence, elicitation of subjective probabilities and economic modelling.
    Meads C; Auguste P; Davenport C; Małysiak S; Sundar S; Kowalska M; Zapalska A; Guest P; Thangaratinam S; Martin-Hirsch P; Borowiack E; Barton P; Roberts T; Khan K
    Health Technol Assess; 2013 Mar; 17(12):1-323. PubMed ID: 23537558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Treatment strategies for stage IB cervical cancer: A cost-effectiveness analysis from Korean, Canadian and U.S. perspectives.
    Lee JY; Kwon JS; Cohn DE; Kim Y; Smith B; Lee TJ; Kim JW
    Gynecol Oncol; 2016 Jan; 140(1):83-9. PubMed ID: 26548733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Primary surgery versus chemoradiation in the treatment of IB2 cervical carcinoma: a cost effectiveness analysis.
    Jewell EL; Kulasingam S; Myers ER; Alvarez Secord A; Havrilesky LJ
    Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Dec; 107(3):532-40. PubMed ID: 17900674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Nodal-staging surgery for locally advanced cervical cancer in the era of PET.
    Gouy S; Morice P; Narducci F; Uzan C; Gilmore J; Kolesnikov-Gauthier H; Querleu D; Haie-Meder C; Leblanc E
    Lancet Oncol; 2012 May; 13(5):e212-20. PubMed ID: 22554549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prediction model for para-aortic lymph node metastasis in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer.
    Shim SH; Kim DY; Lee SJ; Kim SN; Kang SB; Lee SW; Park JY; Suh DS; Kim JH; Kim YM; Kim YT; Nam JH
    Gynecol Oncol; 2017 Jan; 144(1):40-45. PubMed ID: 27855989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Extended field intensity modulated radiation therapy with concomitant boost for lymph node-positive cervical cancer: analysis of regional control and recurrence patterns in the positron emission tomography/computed tomography era.
    Vargo JA; Kim H; Choi S; Sukumvanich P; Olawaiye AB; Kelley JL; Edwards RP; Comerci JT; Beriwal S
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2014 Dec; 90(5):1091-8. PubMed ID: 25303889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prospective multicenter study evaluating the survival of patients with locally advanced cervical cancer undergoing laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy before chemoradiotherapy in the era of positron emission tomography imaging.
    Gouy S; Morice P; Narducci F; Uzan C; Martinez A; Rey A; Bentivegna E; Pautier P; Deandreis D; Querleu D; Haie-Meder C; Leblanc E
    J Clin Oncol; 2013 Aug; 31(24):3026-33. PubMed ID: 23857967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of 18-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography in the pretherapeutic detection of occult para-aortic node involvement in patients with a locally advanced cervical carcinoma.
    Leblanc E; Gauthier H; Querleu D; Ferron G; Zerdoud S; Morice P; Uzan C; Lumbroso S; Lecuru F; Bats AS; Ghazzar N; Bannier M; Houvenaeghel G; Brenot-Rossi I; Narducci F
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Aug; 18(8):2302-9. PubMed ID: 21347790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluating PET-CT in routine surveillance and follow-up after treatment for cervical cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Auguste P; Barton P; Meads C; Davenport C; Małysiak S; Kowalska M; Zapalska A; Guest P; Martin-Hirsch P; Borowiack E; Khan K; Sundar S; Roberts T
    BJOG; 2014 Mar; 121(4):464-76. PubMed ID: 24299112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Added value of para-aortic surgical staging compared to
    De Cuypere M; Lovinfosse P; Goffin F; Gennigens C; Rovira R; Duch J; Fastrez M; Gebhart G; Squifflet JL; Luyckx M; Charaf G; Crener K; Buxant F; Bucella D; Jouret M; Hustinx R; Kridelka F
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2020 May; 46(5):883-887. PubMed ID: 31784203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Para-aortic workup in locally advanced cervical cancer: heterogeneity is still the rule. Results from a retrospective multicenter study.
    Chantalat E; Vidal F; Leguevaque P; Lepage B; Lambaudie E; Hebert T; Motton S
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2016 May; 293(5):1081-6. PubMed ID: 26385726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Selection of patients with advanced-stage cervical cancer for para-aortic lymphadenectomy in the era of PET/CT.
    Margulies AL; Peres A; Barranger E; Perreti I; Brouland JF; Toubet E; Sarda-Mantel LE; Thoury A; Chis C; Walker F; Luton D; Delpech Y; Koskas M
    Anticancer Res; 2013 Jan; 33(1):283-6. PubMed ID: 23267158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy in advanced cervical cancer: morbidity and impact on therapy].
    Souadka A; Gouy S; Debaere T; Duclos J; Lumbroso J; Haie-Meder C; Morice P; Uzan C
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2012 Mar; 40(3):153-7. PubMed ID: 22361464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [The indication and surgery scope for laparoscopic extraperitoneal lymphadenectomy in locally advanced cervical cancer].
    Zhong ML; Liang MR; Jiang W; Wang YN; Zeng Y; Zeng SY
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2019 Apr; 41(4):303-308. PubMed ID: 31014057
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Multi-center experience of robot-assisted laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy for staging of locally advanced cervical carcinoma.
    Fastrez M; Goffin F; Vergote I; Vandromme J; Petit P; Leunen K; Degueldre M
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2013 Aug; 92(8):895-901. PubMed ID: 23590725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interest of para-aortic lymphadenectomy for locally advanced cervical cancer in the era of PET scanning.
    Khebbeb S; Rathat G; Serrand C; Bourdon A; Ferrer C; Duraes M
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2022 May; 272():234-239. PubMed ID: 35397374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cost-effectiveness analysis of strategies introducing integrated ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT into the mediastinal lymph node staging of non-small-cell lung cancer.
    Han Y; Xiao H; Zhou Z; Yuan M; Zeng Y; Wu H; Fang Y
    Nucl Med Commun; 2015 Mar; 36(3):234-41. PubMed ID: 25460305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Laparoscopic extraperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy in locally advanced cervical cancer: a prospective correlation of surgical findings with positron emission tomography/computed tomography findings.
    Ramirez PT; Jhingran A; Macapinlac HA; Euscher ED; Munsell MF; Coleman RL; Soliman PT; Schmeler KM; Frumovitz M; Ramondetta LM
    Cancer; 2011 May; 117(9):1928-34. PubMed ID: 21509770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Upfront treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer with intensity modulated radiation therapy compared to four-field radiation therapy: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Lesnock JL; Farris C; Beriwal S; Krivak TC
    Gynecol Oncol; 2013 Jun; 129(3):574-9. PubMed ID: 23500086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.