157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25925676)
1. Advancing knowledge of rapid reviews: an analysis of results, conclusions and recommendations from published review articles examining rapid reviews.
Featherstone RM; Dryden DM; Foisy M; Guise JM; Mitchell MD; Paynter RA; Robinson KA; Umscheid CA; Hartling L
Syst Rev; 2015 Apr; 4():50. PubMed ID: 25925676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: methodological approaches to evaluate the literature and establish best evidence.
Skelly AC; Hashimoto RE; Norvell DC; Dettori JR; Fischer DJ; Wilson JR; Tetreault LA; Fehlings MG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Oct; 38(22 Suppl 1):S9-18. PubMed ID: 24026148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. How to conduct systematic reviews more expeditiously?
Tsertsvadze A; Chen YF; Moher D; Sutcliffe P; McCarthy N
Syst Rev; 2015 Nov; 4():160. PubMed ID: 26563648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Rapid review programs to support health care and policy decision making: a descriptive analysis of processes and methods.
Polisena J; Garritty C; Kamel C; Stevens A; Abou-Setta AM
Syst Rev; 2015 Mar; 4():26. PubMed ID: 25874967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A retrospective comparison of systematic reviews with same-topic rapid reviews.
Reynen E; Robson R; Ivory J; Hwee J; Straus SE; Pham B; Tricco AC
J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Apr; 96():23-34. PubMed ID: 29258906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Choose your shortcuts wisely: COVID-19 rapid reviews of traditional, complementary and integrative medicine.
Hunter J; Arentz S; Goldenberg J; Yang G; Beardsley J; Lee MS; Myers SP
Integr Med Res; 2020 Sep; 9(3):100484. PubMed ID: 32837904
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Defining Rapid Reviews: a systematic scoping review and thematic analysis of definitions and defining characteristics of rapid reviews.
Hamel C; Michaud A; Thuku M; Skidmore B; Stevens A; Nussbaumer-Streit B; Garritty C
J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Jan; 129():74-85. PubMed ID: 33038541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A pragmatic strategy for the review of clinical evidence.
Sagliocca L; De Masi S; Ferrigno L; Mele A; Traversa G
J Eval Clin Pract; 2013 Aug; 19(4):689-96. PubMed ID: 23317014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Increased number of systematic reviews in the Netherlands in the period 1991-2000].
Grootens KP; Assendelft WJ; Overbeke AJ
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2003 Nov; 147(45):2226-30. PubMed ID: 14640061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Time relevance, citation of reporting guidelines, and breadth of literature search in systematic reviews in orthodontics.
Livas C; Pandis N; Ren Y
Eur J Orthod; 2015 Apr; 37(2):183-7. PubMed ID: 25052374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Survey of the reporting characteristics of systematic reviews in rehabilitation.
Gianola S; Gasparini M; Agostini M; Castellini G; Corbetta D; Gozzer P; Li LC; Sirtori V; Taricco M; Tetzlaff JM; Turolla A; Moher D; Moja L
Phys Ther; 2013 Nov; 93(11):1456-66. PubMed ID: 23744458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessing the format and content of journal published and non-journal published rapid review reports: A comparative study.
Garritty C; Hersi M; Hamel C; Stevens A; Monfaredi Z; Butler C; Tricco AC; Hartling L; Stewart LA; Welch V; Thavorn K; Cheng W; Moher D
PLoS One; 2020; 15(8):e0238025. PubMed ID: 32845906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An analysis of review articles published in four anaesthesia journals.
Smith AF
Can J Anaesth; 1997 Apr; 44(4):405-9. PubMed ID: 9104524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews in the orthopaedic literature.
Gagnier JJ; Kellam PJ
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Jun; 95(11):e771-7. PubMed ID: 23780547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Methodological guidance for rapid reviews in healthcare: A scoping review.
Speckemeier C; Niemann A; Wasem J; Buchberger B; Neusser S
Res Synth Methods; 2022 Jul; 13(4):394-404. PubMed ID: 35247034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Current methods for development of rapid reviews about diagnostic tests: an international survey.
Arevalo-Rodriguez I; Steingart KR; Tricco AC; Nussbaumer-Streit B; Kaunelis D; Alonso-Coello P; Baxter S; Bossuyt PM; Emparanza JI; Zamora J
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 May; 20(1):115. PubMed ID: 32404051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Systematic reviews supporting practice guideline recommendations lack protection against bias.
Brito JP; Tsapas A; Griebeler ML; Wang Z; Prutsky GJ; Domecq JP; Murad MH; Montori VM
J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Jun; 66(6):633-8. PubMed ID: 23510557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Rapid review: A review of methods and recommendations based on current evidence.
Guo Q; Jiang G; Zhao Q; Long Y; Feng K; Gu X; Xu Y; Li Z; Huang J; Du L
J Evid Based Med; 2024 Jun; 17(2):434-453. PubMed ID: 38512942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
