These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25927386)

  • 1. Unified method to integrate and blend several, potentially related, sources of information for genetic evaluation.
    Vandenplas J; Colinet FG; Gengler N
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Sep; 46(1):59. PubMed ID: 25927386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison and improvements of different Bayesian procedures to integrate external information into genetic evaluations.
    Vandenplas J; Gengler N
    J Dairy Sci; 2012 Mar; 95(3):1513-26. PubMed ID: 22365232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bayesian single-step genomic evaluations combining local and foreign information in Walloon Holsteins.
    Colinet FG; Vandenplas J; Vanderick S; Hammami H; Mota RR; Gillon A; Hubin X; Bertozzi C; Gengler N
    Animal; 2018 May; 12(5):898-905. PubMed ID: 29032781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. National single-step genomic method that integrates multi-national genomic information.
    Vandenplas J; Spehar M; Potocnik K; Gengler N; Gorjanc G
    J Dairy Sci; 2017 Jan; 100(1):465-478. PubMed ID: 27865486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Contribution of domestic production records, Interbull estimated breeding values, and single nucleotide polymorphism genetic markers to the single-step genomic evaluation of milk production.
    Přibyl J; Madsen P; Bauer J; Přibylová J; Simečková M; Vostrý L; Zavadilová L
    J Dairy Sci; 2013 Mar; 96(3):1865-73. PubMed ID: 23312993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Integration of external estimated breeding values and associated reliabilities using correlations among traits and effects.
    Vandenplas J; Colinet FG; Glorieux G; Bertozzi C; Gengler N
    J Dairy Sci; 2015 Dec; 98(12):9044-50. PubMed ID: 26433411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Genomic evaluation of Brown Swiss dairy cattle with limited national genotype data and integrated external information.
    Luštrek B; Vandenplas J; Gorjanc G; Potočnik K
    J Dairy Sci; 2021 May; 104(5):5738-5754. PubMed ID: 33685705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Major advances in genetic evaluation techniques.
    Powell RL; Norman HD
    J Dairy Sci; 2006 Apr; 89(4):1337-48. PubMed ID: 16537965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of performance records and national breeding values as input into international genetic evaluation.
    Fikse WF
    J Dairy Sci; 2004 Aug; 87(8):2709-19. PubMed ID: 15328297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Weighting factors of sire daughter information in international genetic evaluations.
    Fikse WF; Banos G
    J Dairy Sci; 2001 Jul; 84(7):1759-67. PubMed ID: 11467826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A simple method for genomic selection of moderately sized dairy cattle populations.
    Weller JI; Ron M; Glick G; Shirak A; Zeron Y; Ezra E
    Animal; 2012 Feb; 6(2):193-202. PubMed ID: 22436176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Use of a single-step approach for integrating foreign information into national genomic evaluation in Holstein cattle.
    Guarini AR; Lourenco DAL; Brito LF; Sargolzaei M; Baes CF; Miglior F; Tsuruta S; Misztal I; Schenkel FS
    J Dairy Sci; 2019 Sep; 102(9):8175-8183. PubMed ID: 31301840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of a national genomic preselection on the international genetic evaluations.
    Patry C; Jorjani H; Ducrocq V
    J Dairy Sci; 2013 May; 96(5):3272-84. PubMed ID: 23477823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of breeding strategies for polledness in dairy cattle using a newly developed simulation framework for quantitative and Mendelian traits.
    Scheper C; Wensch-Dorendorf M; Yin T; Dressel H; Swalve H; König S
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Jun; 48(1):50. PubMed ID: 27357942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy of genomic breeding values in multibreed beef cattle populations derived from deregressed breeding values and phenotypes.
    Weber KL; Thallman RM; Keele JW; Snelling WM; Bennett GL; Smith TP; McDaneld TG; Allan MF; Van Eenennaam AL; Kuehn LA
    J Anim Sci; 2012 Dec; 90(12):4177-90. PubMed ID: 22767091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genetic evaluation of lactation persistency for five breeds of dairy cattle.
    Cole JB; Null DJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 May; 92(5):2248-58. PubMed ID: 19389984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy of predicting genomic breeding values for residual feed intake in Angus and Charolais beef cattle.
    Chen L; Schenkel F; Vinsky M; Crews DH; Li C
    J Anim Sci; 2013 Oct; 91(10):4669-78. PubMed ID: 24078618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validation of an approximate REML algorithm for parameter estimation in a multitrait, multiple across-country evaluation model: a simulation study.
    Tarrés J; Liu Z; Ducrocq V; Reinhardt F; Reents R
    J Dairy Sci; 2007 Oct; 90(10):4846-55. PubMed ID: 17881708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of joint versus purebred genomic evaluation in the French multi-breed dairy goat population.
    Carillier C; Larroque H; Robert-Granié C
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Oct; 46(1):67. PubMed ID: 25927866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of international dairy sire evaluations from meta-analysis of national estimated breeding values and direct analysis of individual animal performance records.
    Maltecca C; Bagnato A; Weigel KA
    J Dairy Sci; 2004 Aug; 87(8):2599-605. PubMed ID: 15328284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.