These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25927386)

  • 21. Application of Bayesian least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and BayesCπ methods for genomic selection in French Holstein and Montbéliarde breeds.
    Colombani C; Legarra A; Fritz S; Guillaume F; Croiseau P; Ducrocq V; Robert-Granié C
    J Dairy Sci; 2013 Jan; 96(1):575-91. PubMed ID: 23127905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Approaches to estimating daily yield from single milk testing schemes and use of a.m.-p.m. records in test-day model genetic evaluation in dairy cattle.
    Liu Z; Reents R; Reinhardt F; Kuwan K
    J Dairy Sci; 2000 Nov; 83(11):2672-82. PubMed ID: 11104288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Animal model evaluations for Mexican Holsteins.
    Powell RL; Wiggans GR
    J Dairy Sci; 1991 Apr; 74(4):1420-7. PubMed ID: 1860983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Genetic evaluation of dairy cattle with test-day models with autoregressive covariance structures and with a 305-d model.
    Sawalha RM; Keown JF; Kachman SD; Van Vleck LD
    J Dairy Sci; 2005 Sep; 88(9):3346-53. PubMed ID: 16107425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effect of time period of data used in international dairy sire evaluations.
    Weigel KA; Banos G
    J Dairy Sci; 1997 Dec; 80(12):3425-30. PubMed ID: 9436125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Practical implications for genetic modeling in the genomics era.
    VanRaden PM
    J Dairy Sci; 2016 Mar; 99(3):2405-2412. PubMed ID: 26778313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Genetic evaluation of Australian dairy cattle for somatic cell scores using multi-trait random regression test-day model.
    Konstantinov KV; Beard KT; Goddard ME; van der Werf JH
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2009 Jun; 126(3):209-15. PubMed ID: 19646149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A simple procedure for obtaining approximate interim cow solutions from an animal model.
    Weller JI; Israel C; Ezra E
    J Dairy Sci; 1994 Apr; 77(4):1126-31. PubMed ID: 8201047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Integrating genomic selection into dairy cattle breeding programmes: a review.
    Bouquet A; Juga J
    Animal; 2013 May; 7(5):705-13. PubMed ID: 23200196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. An integration of external information for foreign stallions into the Belgian genetic evaluation for jumping horses.
    Vandenplas J; Janssens S; Buys N; Gengler N
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2013 Jun; 130(3):209-17. PubMed ID: 23679946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Reliabilities of genomic prediction using combined reference data of the Nordic Red dairy cattle populations.
    Brøndum RF; Rius-Vilarrasa E; Strandén I; Su G; Guldbrandtsen B; Fikse WF; Lund MS
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Sep; 94(9):4700-7. PubMed ID: 21854944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Genetic evaluations for mixed-breed populations.
    VanRaden PM; Tooker ME; Cole JB; Wiggans GR; Megonigal JH
    J Dairy Sci; 2007 May; 90(5):2434-41. PubMed ID: 17430948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Integration of Interbull's multiple across-country evaluation approach breeding values into the multiple-trait single-step random regression test-day genetic evaluation for yield traits of Australian Red breeds.
    Boerner V; Nguyen TTT; Nieuwhof GJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2023 Feb; 106(2):1159-1167. PubMed ID: 36460505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Strategies for estimating genetic parameters in marker-assisted best linear unbiased predictor models in dairy cattle.
    Neuner S; Emmerling R; Thaller G; Götz KU
    J Dairy Sci; 2008 Nov; 91(11):4344-54. PubMed ID: 18946140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Body condition scores and dairy form evaluations as indicators of days open in US Holsteins.
    Dechow CD; Rogers GW; Klei L; Lawlor TJ; VanRaden PM
    J Dairy Sci; 2004 Oct; 87(10):3534-41. PubMed ID: 15377633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A robust method for simultaneous estimation of single gene and polygenic effects in dairy cows using externally estimated breeding values as prior information.
    Buske B; Szydlowski M; Gengler N
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2010 Aug; 127(4):272-9. PubMed ID: 20646114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Computational strategies for national integration of phenotypic, genomic, and pedigree data in a single-step best linear unbiased prediction.
    Legarra A; Ducrocq V
    J Dairy Sci; 2012 Aug; 95(8):4629-45. PubMed ID: 22818478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Influence of model specifications on the reliabilities of genomic prediction in a Swedish-Finnish red breed cattle population.
    Rius-Vilarrasa E; Brøndum RF; Strandén I; Guldbrandtsen B; Strandberg E; Lund MS; Fikse WF
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2012 Oct; 129(5):369-79. PubMed ID: 22963358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Bias in genetic evaluations by records of cows treated with bovine somatotropin.
    Tsuruta S; Keown JF; Van Vleck LD; Misztal I
    J Dairy Sci; 2000 Nov; 83(11):2650-6. PubMed ID: 11104285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Genetic selection for health traits using producer-recorded data. II. Genetic correlations, disease probabilities, and relationships with existing traits.
    Zwald NR; Weigel KA; Chang YM; Welper RD; Clay JS
    J Dairy Sci; 2004 Dec; 87(12):4295-302. PubMed ID: 15545393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.