312 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25927636)
1. 'Real-world' health care priority setting using explicit decision criteria: a systematic review of the literature.
Cromwell I; Peacock SJ; Mitton C
BMC Health Serv Res; 2015 Apr; 15():164. PubMed ID: 25927636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Case studies that illustrate disinvestment and resource allocation decision-making processes in health care: a systematic review.
Polisena J; Clifford T; Elshaug AG; Mitton C; Russell E; Skidmore B
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2013 Apr; 29(2):174-84. PubMed ID: 23514665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Disease control priorities for neglected tropical diseases: lessons from priority ranking based on the quality of evidence, cost effectiveness, severity of disease, catastrophic health expenditures, and loss of productivity.
Strømme EM; Baerøe K; Norheim OF
Dev World Bioeth; 2014 Dec; 14(3):132-41. PubMed ID: 23724925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sustainability in Health care by Allocating Resources Effectively (SHARE) 2: identifying opportunities for disinvestment in a local healthcare setting.
Harris C; Allen K; King R; Ramsey W; Kelly C; Thiagarajan M
BMC Health Serv Res; 2017 May; 17(1):328. PubMed ID: 28476159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Describing practices of priority setting and resource allocation in publicly funded health care systems of high-income countries.
Seixas BV; Regier DA; Bryan S; Mitton C
BMC Health Serv Res; 2021 Jan; 21(1):90. PubMed ID: 33499854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Priority setting in the provincial health services authority: survey of key decision makers.
Teng F; Mitton C; Mackenzie J
BMC Health Serv Res; 2007 Jun; 7():84. PubMed ID: 17565691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Equity in healthcare resource allocation decision making: A systematic review.
Lane H; Sarkies M; Martin J; Haines T
Soc Sci Med; 2017 Feb; 175():11-27. PubMed ID: 28043036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evidence, values, and funding decisions in Canadian cancer systems.
Peacock SJ; Regier DA; Raymakers AJN; Chan KKW
Healthc Manage Forum; 2019 Nov; 32(6):293-298. PubMed ID: 31645144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sustainability in Health care by Allocating Resources Effectively (SHARE) 11: reporting outcomes of an evidence-driven approach to disinvestment in a local healthcare setting.
Harris C; Allen K; Ramsey W; King R; Green S
BMC Health Serv Res; 2018 May; 18(1):386. PubMed ID: 29843702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Equity and efficiency preferences of health policy makers in China--a stated preference analysis.
Paolucci F; Mentzakis E; Defechereux T; Niessen LW
Health Policy Plan; 2015 Oct; 30(8):1059-66. PubMed ID: 25500745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Priority setting and the ethics of resource allocation within VA healthcare facilities: results of a survey.
Foglia MB; Pearlman RA; Bottrell MM; Altemose JA; Fox E
Organ Ethic; 2008; 4(2):83-96. PubMed ID: 18839751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Health technology funding decision-making processes around the world: the same, yet different.
Stafinski T; Menon D; Philippon DJ; McCabe C
Pharmacoeconomics; 2011 Jun; 29(6):475-95. PubMed ID: 21568357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Addressing the affordability of cancer drugs: using deliberative public engagement to inform health policy.
Bentley C; Peacock S; Abelson J; Burgess MM; Demers-Payette O; Longstaff H; Tripp L; Lavis JN; Wilson MG
Health Res Policy Syst; 2019 Feb; 17(1):17. PubMed ID: 30732616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Understanding what matters: An exploratory study to investigate the views of the general public for priority setting criteria in health care.
Ratcliffe J; Lancsar E; Walker R; Gu Y
Health Policy; 2017 Jun; 121(6):653-662. PubMed ID: 28411964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. How have systematic priority setting approaches influenced policy making? A synthesis of the current literature.
Kapiriri L; Razavi D
Health Policy; 2017 Sep; 121(9):937-946. PubMed ID: 28734682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sustainability in health care by allocating resources effectively (SHARE) 4: exploring opportunities and methods for consumer engagement in resource allocation in a local healthcare setting.
Harris C; Ko H; Waller C; Sloss P; Williams P
BMC Health Serv Res; 2017 May; 17(1):329. PubMed ID: 28476155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. How to choose health technologies to be assessed by HTA? A review of criteria for priority setting.
Specchia ML; Favale M; Di Nardo F; Rotundo G; Favaretti C; Ricciardi W; de Waure C;
Epidemiol Prev; 2015; 39(4 Suppl 1):39-44. PubMed ID: 26499414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. TESTING MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS FOR MORE TRANSPARENT RESOURCE-ALLOCATION DECISION MAKING IN COLOMBIA.
Castro Jaramillo HE; Goetghebeur M; Moreno-Mattar O
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2016 Jan; 32(4):307-314. PubMed ID: 27691990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Criteria Used for Priority-Setting for Public Health Resource Allocation in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review.
Kaur G; Prinja S; Lakshmi PVM; Downey L; Sharma D; Teerawattananon Y
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2019; 35(6):474-483. PubMed ID: 31307561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
