BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

312 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25927636)

  • 21. Priority setting and resource allocation in the US health system: is there a place for hard caps?
    Mitton C; Dionne F
    J Health Organ Manag; 2020 Feb; ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print):. PubMed ID: 32096928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Mapping of multiple criteria for priority setting of health interventions: an aid for decision makers.
    Tromp N; Baltussen R
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2012 Dec; 12():454. PubMed ID: 23234463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Priority Setting Meets Multiple Streams: A Match to Be Further Examined? Comment on "Introducing New Priority Setting and Resource Allocation Processes in a Canadian Healthcare Organization: A Case Study Analysis Informed by Multiple Streams Theory.
    Cumming JM
    Int J Health Policy Manag; 2016 Aug; 5(8):497-499. PubMed ID: 27694663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Clarifying efficiency-equity tradeoffs through explicit criteria, with a focus on developing countries.
    James C; Carrin G; Savedoff W; Hanvoravongchai P
    Health Care Anal; 2005 Mar; 13(1):33-51. PubMed ID: 15889680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Prioritisation of specialist health care services; not NICE, not easy but it can be done.
    Anderson P; Webb P; Groves S
    Health Policy; 2017 Sep; 121(9):978-985. PubMed ID: 28797706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Health care priority setting: principles, practice and challenges.
    Mitton C; Donaldson C
    Cost Eff Resour Alloc; 2004 Apr; 2(1):3. PubMed ID: 15104792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.
    Newell S; Jordan Z
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Jan; 13(1):76-87. PubMed ID: 26447009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Priority setting in the Austrian healthcare system: results from a discrete choice experiment and implications for mental health.
    Mentzakis E; Paolucci F; Rubicko G
    J Ment Health Policy Econ; 2014 Jun; 17(2):61-73. PubMed ID: 25153094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Achieving Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA): A Conceptual Review of Normative Economics Frameworks.
    Otim ME; Almarzouqi AM; Mukasa JP; Gachiri W
    Front Public Health; 2020; 8():584547. PubMed ID: 33304876
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Key factors that influence government policies and decision making about healthcare priorities: Lessons for the field of eating disorders.
    Whiteford H; Weissman RS
    Int J Eat Disord; 2017 Mar; 50(3):315-319. PubMed ID: 28221676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Identifying research priorities for health care priority setting: a collaborative effort between managers and researchers.
    Smith N; Mitton C; Peacock S; Cornelissen E; MacLeod S
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2009 Sep; 9():165. PubMed ID: 19754969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Use of economic evaluation in local health care decision-making in England: a qualitative investigation.
    Eddama O; Coast J
    Health Policy; 2009 Mar; 89(3):261-70. PubMed ID: 18657336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Social values and health priority setting in Australia: an analysis applied to the context of health technology assessment.
    Whitty JA; Littlejohns P
    Health Policy; 2015 Feb; 119(2):127-36. PubMed ID: 25267072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Improving resource allocation decisions for health and HIV programmes in South Africa: Bioethical, cost-effectiveness and health diplomacy considerations.
    Kevany S; Benatar SR; Fleischer T
    Glob Public Health; 2013; 8(5):570-87. PubMed ID: 23651436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A multicriteria resource allocation model for the redesign of services following birth.
    Bowers J; Cheyne H; Mould G; Miller M; Page M; Harris F; Bick D
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2018 Aug; 18(1):656. PubMed ID: 30134882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Decision-making criteria for medicine reimbursement in Slovenia: an expert panel discussion.
    Detiček A; Janzic A; Locatelli I; Kos M
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2018 Jun; 18(1):496. PubMed ID: 29945634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Roles and responsibilities of clinical ethics committees in priority setting.
    Magelssen M; Miljeteig I; Pedersen R; Førde R
    BMC Med Ethics; 2017 Dec; 18(1):68. PubMed ID: 29191186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. EVALUATION CRITERIA OF PATIENT AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT IN RESOURCE ALLOCATION DECISIONS: A LITERATURE REVIEW AND QUALITATIVE STUDY.
    Rosenberg-Yunger ZRS; Bayoumi AM
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2017 Jan; 33(2):270-278. PubMed ID: 28514982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The Norwegian National Council for Priority Setting in Health Care: decisions and justifications.
    Wester G; Bringedal B
    Health Econ Policy Law; 2018 Apr; 13(2):118-136. PubMed ID: 28322184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Quantifying benefit-risk preferences for medical interventions: an overview of a growing empirical literature.
    Brett Hauber A; Fairchild AO; Reed Johnson F
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2013 Aug; 11(4):319-29. PubMed ID: 23637054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.