BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

935 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25928287)

  • 21. Cost-effectiveness of screening women with familial risk for breast cancer with magnetic resonance imaging.
    Saadatmand S; Tilanus-Linthorst MM; Rutgers EJ; Hoogerbrugge N; Oosterwijk JC; Tollenaar RA; Hooning M; Loo CE; Obdeijn IM; Heijnsdijk EA; de Koning HJ
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2013 Sep; 105(17):1314-21. PubMed ID: 23940285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Impact of extending screening mammography to older women: Information to support informed choices.
    Jacklyn G; Howard K; Irwig L; Houssami N; Hersch J; Barratt A
    Int J Cancer; 2017 Oct; 141(8):1540-1550. PubMed ID: 28662267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. United States Preventive Services Task Force screening mammography recommendations: science ignored.
    Hendrick RE; Helvie MA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Feb; 196(2):W112-6. PubMed ID: 21257850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Breast cancer screening policies in developing countries: a cost-effectiveness analysis for India.
    Okonkwo QL; Draisma G; der Kinderen A; Brown ML; de Koning HJ
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 Sep; 100(18):1290-300. PubMed ID: 18780864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Screening mammography--early detection or over-diagnosis? Contribution from Australian data.
    Bell RJ
    Climacteric; 2014 Dec; 17 Suppl 2():66-72. PubMed ID: 25224048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Benefits and Harms of Screening Mammography by Comorbidity and Age: A Qualitative Synthesis of Observational Studies and Decision Analyses.
    Braithwaite D; Walter LC; Izano M; Kerlikowske K
    J Gen Intern Med; 2016 May; 31(5):561-72. PubMed ID: 26831305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Mammography screening].
    Zwahlen M; Egger M
    Ther Umsch; 2013 Apr; 70(4):205-12; discussion 212-3. PubMed ID: 23535547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Breast cancer screening: the evolving evidence.
    Smith RA; Duffy SW; Tabár L
    Oncology (Williston Park); 2012 May; 26(5):471-5, 479-81, 485-6. PubMed ID: 22730603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Radiation-Induced Breast Cancer Incidence and Mortality From Digital Mammography Screening: A Modeling Study.
    Miglioretti DL; Lange J; van den Broek JJ; Lee CI; van Ravesteyn NT; Ritley D; Kerlikowske K; Fenton JJ; Melnikow J; de Koning HJ; Hubbard RA
    Ann Intern Med; 2016 Feb; 164(4):205-14. PubMed ID: 26756460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Cost-effectiveness of digital mammography screening before the age of 50 in The Netherlands.
    Sankatsing VD; Heijnsdijk EA; van Luijt PA; van Ravesteyn NT; Fracheboud J; de Koning HJ
    Int J Cancer; 2015 Oct; 137(8):1990-9. PubMed ID: 25895135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Screening for breast cancer with mammography.
    Gøtzsche PC; Jørgensen KJ
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Jun; 2013(6):CD001877. PubMed ID: 23737396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Screening for breast cancer with mammography.
    Gøtzsche PC; Nielsen M
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2011 Jan; (1):CD001877. PubMed ID: 21249649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Screening for breast cancer with mammography.
    Gøtzsche PC; Nielsen M
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2009 Oct; (4):CD001877. PubMed ID: 19821284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Digital mammography screening: weighing reduced mortality against increased overdiagnosis.
    de Gelder R; Fracheboud J; Heijnsdijk EA; den Heeten G; Verbeek AL; Broeders MJ; Draisma G; de Koning HJ
    Prev Med; 2011 Sep; 53(3):134-40. PubMed ID: 21718717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Mammographic screening for breast cancer. Overdiagnosis: an insidious adverse effect of screening.
    Prescrire Int; 2015 Jul; 24(162):186-9, 191. PubMed ID: 26240891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Screening for breast cancer: an update for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.
    Nelson HD; Tyne K; Naik A; Bougatsos C; Chan BK; Humphrey L;
    Ann Intern Med; 2009 Nov; 151(10):727-37, W237-42. PubMed ID: 19920273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Discussing the benefits and harms of screening mammography.
    Brennan M; Houssami N
    Maturitas; 2016 Oct; 92():150-153. PubMed ID: 27621253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effectiveness of mammography screening in reducing breast cancer mortality in women aged 39-49 years: a meta-analysis.
    Magnus MC; Ping M; Shen MM; Bourgeois J; Magnus JH
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2011 Jun; 20(6):845-52. PubMed ID: 21413892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Why mammography screening has not lived up to expectations from the randomised trials.
    Gøtzsche PC; Jørgensen KJ; Zahl PH; Mæhlen J
    Cancer Causes Control; 2012 Jan; 23(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 22072221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Mammography screening for breast cancer in Copenhagen April 1991-March 1997. Mammography Screening Evaluation Group.
    Lynge E
    APMIS Suppl; 1998; 83():1-44. PubMed ID: 9850674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 47.