BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25928527)

  • 1. RE: Clinical relevance of routine semen analysis and controversies surrounding the 2010 World Health Organization criteria for semen examination.
    Cocuzza M
    Int Braz J Urol; 2015; 41(1):181-3. PubMed ID: 25928527
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical relevance of routine semen analysis and controversies surrounding the 2010 World Health Organization criteria for semen examination.
    Esteves SC
    Int Braz J Urol; 2014; 40(4):443-53. PubMed ID: 25254609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Re: the effect of the new 2010 world health organization criteria for semen analyses on male infertility.
    Niederberger C
    J Urol; 2013 Aug; 190(2):648. PubMed ID: 23845369
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Semen analysis: a new manual and its application to the understanding of semen and its pathology.
    Jequier AM
    Asian J Androl; 2010 Jan; 12(1):11-3. PubMed ID: 20111075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Afterword to Semen Analysis in 21st Century Medicine special issue in Asian Journal of Andrology.
    Handelsman DJ; Cooper TG
    Asian J Androl; 2010 Jan; 12(1):118-23. PubMed ID: 20111092
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of the new 2010 World Health Organization criteria for semen analyses on male infertility.
    Murray KS; James A; McGeady JB; Reed ML; Kuang WW; Nangia AK
    Fertil Steril; 2012 Dec; 98(6):1428-31. PubMed ID: 22921910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Determination of male infertility: is the 2010 WHO reference range helpful or confusing?
    Centola GM
    Fertil Steril; 2012 Dec; 98(6):1416-7. PubMed ID: 22925685
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Semen analysis: spermiogram according to WHO criteria].
    Kliesch S; Cooper TG
    Urologe A; 2008 Dec; 47(12):1548, 1550-4. PubMed ID: 18953523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. New World Health Organization reference values for semen analysis: where do we stand?
    Vieira M
    Einstein (Sao Paulo); 2013; 11(2):263-4. PubMed ID: 23843074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. 'How to count sperm properly': checklist for acceptability of studies based on human semen analysis.
    Björndahl L; Barratt CL; Mortimer D; Jouannet P
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Feb; 31(2):227-32. PubMed ID: 26682580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [World Health Organization manual for the processing of human semen-2010].
    Cardona Maya W
    Actas Urol Esp; 2010 Jul; 34(7):577-8. PubMed ID: 20540872
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sperm morphology classification: a rational method for schemes adopted by the world health organization.
    Rothmann SA; Bort AM; Quigley J; Pillow R
    Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 927():27-37. PubMed ID: 22992901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. National semen analysis reference range reporting: adherence to the 1999 World Health Organization guidelines 10 years later.
    Penn HA; Windsperger A; Smith Z; Parekattil SJ; Kuang WW; Kolettis PN; Nangia AK
    Fertil Steril; 2011 Jun; 95(7):2320-3. PubMed ID: 21457971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical relevance of sperm DNA assessment: an update.
    Barratt CL; De Jonge CJ
    Fertil Steril; 2010 Nov; 94(6):1958-9. PubMed ID: 20723890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison between WHO (World Health Organization) 2010 and WHO 1999 parameters for semen analysis - interpretation of 529 consecutive samples.
    Catanzariti F; Cantoro U; Lacetera V; Muzzonigro G; Polito M
    Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2013 Sep; 85(3):125-9. PubMed ID: 24085233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. ESHRE special interest group for andrology basic semen analysis course: a continued focus on accuracy, quality, efficiency and clinical relevance.
    Barratt CL; Björndahl L; Menkveld R; Mortimer D
    Hum Reprod; 2011 Dec; 26(12):3207-12. PubMed ID: 21965314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sperm morphology assessment using strict (tygerberg) criteria.
    Menkveld R
    Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 927():39-50. PubMed ID: 22992902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Abnormal sperm count and motility on semen analysis are not sufficiently predictive of abnormal Kruger morphology.
    Morelli SS; Seungdamrong A; McCulloh DH; McGovern PG
    Fertil Steril; 2010 Dec; 94(7):2882-4. PubMed ID: 20674904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [A preliminary study of pre-analysis quality control for semen analysis].
    Ge YF; Wang CH; Lu JC; Shao Y; Yao B; Xia XY; Shang XJ; Huang YF
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2008 Nov; 14(11):1015-8. PubMed ID: 19102504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of varicocele on semen characteristics according to the new 2010 World Health Organization criteria: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Agarwal A; Sharma R; Harlev A; Esteves SC
    Asian J Androl; 2016; 18(2):163-70. PubMed ID: 26780872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.