These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Dyslexia and rapid visual processing: a commentary. Skottun BC; Skoyles JR J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2008 Aug; 30(6):666-73. PubMed ID: 18612875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Processing of visual contour orientation information in normal and disabled reading children. Lovegrove W; Billing G; Slaghuis W Cortex; 1978 Jun; 14(2):268-78. PubMed ID: 679708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Durations of recognition for single letters, with and without visual masking, by dyslexics and normal readers. Grosser GS; Trzeciak GM Percept Mot Skills; 1981 Dec; 53(3):991-5. PubMed ID: 7322794 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Visual-spatial strength in dyslexia: rapid discrimination of impossible figures. von Károlyi C J Learn Disabil; 2001; 34(4):380-91. PubMed ID: 15503582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Visual persistence of spatially filtered images. May JG; Brown JM; Scott S; Donlon M Percept Psychophys; 1990 Jun; 47(6):563-7. PubMed ID: 2367176 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Developmental versus sensory deficit effects on perceptual processing in the reading disabled. Brannan JR; Williams MC Percept Psychophys; 1988 Nov; 44(5):437-44. PubMed ID: 3226893 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of the use of orthographic structure in word discrimination by learning disabled and normal children. Ryan MC; Miller CD; Witt JC J Learn Disabil; 1984 Jan; 17(1):38-40. PubMed ID: 6699503 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Jordan Left-Right Reversal Test: an analysis of visual reversals in children and significance for reading problems. Jordan BT; Jordan SG Child Psychiatry Hum Dev; 1990; 21(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 2397656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The visual processor module and normal adult readers. Bigsby P Br J Psychol; 1988 Nov; 79 ( Pt 4)():455-69. PubMed ID: 3208001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Disabled vs nondisabled readers: perceptual vs higher-order processing of one vs three letters. Allegretti CL; Puglisi JT Percept Mot Skills; 1986 Oct; 63(2 Pt 1):463-9. PubMed ID: 3774453 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Duration of visible persistence in relation to range of spatial frequencies. Di Lollo V; Woods E J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1981 Aug; 7(4):754-769. PubMed ID: 6457090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Spatial discrimination in children with poor vergence control. Riddell PM; Fowler MS; Stein JF Percept Mot Skills; 1990 Jun; 70(3 Pt 1):707-18. PubMed ID: 2377403 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of spatial-frequency specific adaptation and target duration on visual persistence. Meyer GE; Maguire WM J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1981 Feb; 7(1):151-6. PubMed ID: 6452492 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Duration of visible persistence in relation to stimulus complexity. Irwin DE; Yeomans JM Percept Psychophys; 1991 Nov; 50(5):475-89. PubMed ID: 1788036 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Processing of identity and position information in normal and disabled readers. Manis FR; Morrison FJ J Exp Child Psychol; 1982 Feb; 33(1):74-86. PubMed ID: 7057137 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect of orthographic structure on the word search performance of good and poor readers. Stanovich KE; West RF J Exp Child Psychol; 1979 Oct; 28(2):258-67. PubMed ID: 501280 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]