176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25928741)
1. Perceptions of risk from nanotechnologies and trust in stakeholders: a cross sectional study of public, academic, government and business attitudes.
Capon A; Gillespie J; Rolfe M; Smith W
BMC Public Health; 2015 Apr; 15():424. PubMed ID: 25928741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative analysis of the labelling of nanotechnologies across four stakeholder groups.
Capon A; Gillespie J; Rolfe M; Smith W
J Nanopart Res; 2015; 17(8):327. PubMed ID: 26246798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Nanotechnologies in agriculture and food - an overview of different fields of application, risk assessment and public perception.
Grobe A; Rissanen ME
Recent Pat Food Nutr Agric; 2012 Dec; 4(3):176-86. PubMed ID: 23013411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fairness and nanotechnology concern.
McComas KA; Besley JC
Risk Anal; 2011 Nov; 31(11):1749-61. PubMed ID: 21883336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Anticipating the perceived risk of nanotechnologies.
Satterfield T; Kandlikar M; Beaudrie CE; Conti J; Herr Harthorn B
Nat Nanotechnol; 2009 Nov; 4(11):752-8. PubMed ID: 19893527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of trust on two different risk perceptions as an affective and cognitive dimension during Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) outbreak in South Korea: serial cross-sectional surveys.
Jang WM; Kim UN; Jang DH; Jung H; Cho S; Eun SJ; Lee JY
BMJ Open; 2020 Mar; 10(3):e033026. PubMed ID: 32139484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Monitoring the level of government trust, risk perception and intention of the general public to adopt protective measures during the influenza A (H1N1) pandemic in The Netherlands.
van der Weerd W; Timmermans DR; Beaujean DJ; Oudhoff J; van Steenbergen JE
BMC Public Health; 2011 Jul; 11():575. PubMed ID: 21771296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Is the risk from nanomaterials perceived as different from the risk of 'chemicals' by the Australian public?
Capon A; Rolfe M; Gillespie J; Smith W
Public Health Res Pract; 2016 Apr; 26(2):. PubMed ID: 27734061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Laypeople's and experts' perception of nanotechnology hazards.
Siegrist M; Keller C; Kastenholz H; Frey S; Wiek A
Risk Anal; 2007 Feb; 27(1):59-69. PubMed ID: 17362400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Association between trust in the public healthcare system and selecting a surgeon in public hospitals in Israel: a cross-sectional population study.
Niv-Yagoda A
Isr J Health Policy Res; 2020 Jul; 9(1):38. PubMed ID: 32718335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Farmers are the most trusted part of the Australian food chain: results from a national survey of consumers.
Henderson J; Coveney J; Ward PR; Taylor AW
Aust N Z J Public Health; 2011 Aug; 35(4):319-24. PubMed ID: 21806725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Are Australians concerned about nanoparticles? A comparative analysis with established and emerging environmental health issues.
Capon A; Rolfe M; Gillespie J; Smith W
Aust N Z J Public Health; 2015 Feb; 39(1):56-62. PubMed ID: 25648731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The public understanding of nanotechnology in the food domain: the hidden role of views on science, technology, and nature.
Vandermoere F; Blanchemanche S; Bieberstein A; Marette S; Roosen J
Public Underst Sci; 2011 Mar; 20(2):195-206. PubMed ID: 21657134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Demographic indicators of trust in federal, state and local government: implications for Australian health policy makers.
Meyer SB; Mamerow L; Taylor AW; Henderson J; Ward PR; Coveney J
Aust Health Rev; 2013 Feb; 37(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 23116546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Public acceptance of nanotechnology foods and food packaging: the influence of affect and trust.
Siegrist M; Cousin ME; Kastenholz H; Wiek A
Appetite; 2007 Sep; 49(2):459-66. PubMed ID: 17442455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Stakeholders' rationales for representing uncertainties of biotechnological research.
Post S; Maier M
Public Underst Sci; 2016 Nov; 25(8):944-960. PubMed ID: 27129955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Public awareness and misunderstanding about DrinkWise Australia: a cross-sectional survey of Australian adults.
Brennan E; Wakefield MA; Durkin SJ; Jernigan DH; Dixon HG; Pettigrew S
Aust N Z J Public Health; 2017 Aug; 41(4):352-357. PubMed ID: 28664575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Perceived risks and perceived benefits of different nanotechnology foods and nanotechnology food packaging.
Siegrist M; Stampfli N; Kastenholz H; Keller C
Appetite; 2008 Sep; 51(2):283-90. PubMed ID: 18406006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [A study of general public's trust in government and corporation in the issues of defense and nuclear power policies].
Tsunoda K
Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2002 Feb; 72(6):535-40. PubMed ID: 11977849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Nanotechnology in Dutch science cafés: Public risk perceptions contextualised.
Dijkstra AM; Critchley CR
Public Underst Sci; 2016 Jan; 25(1):71-87. PubMed ID: 24812210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
