These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

690 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25928875)

  • 1. Genomic prediction of breeding values using previously estimated SNP variances.
    Calus MP; Schrooten C; Veerkamp RF
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Sep; 46(1):52. PubMed ID: 25928875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Variable selection models for genomic selection using whole-genome sequence data and singular value decomposition.
    Meuwissen THE; Indahl UG; Ødegård J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Dec; 49(1):94. PubMed ID: 29281962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of genomic predictions using genomic relationship matrices built with different weighting factors to account for locus-specific variances.
    Su G; Christensen OF; Janss L; Lund MS
    J Dairy Sci; 2014 Oct; 97(10):6547-59. PubMed ID: 25129495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Modeling heterogeneous (co)variances from adjacent-SNP groups improves genomic prediction for milk protein composition traits.
    Gebreyesus G; Lund MS; Buitenhuis B; Bovenhuis H; Poulsen NA; Janss LG
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Dec; 49(1):89. PubMed ID: 29207947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Genomic selection models double the accuracy of predicted breeding values for bacterial cold water disease resistance compared to a traditional pedigree-based model in rainbow trout aquaculture.
    Vallejo RL; Leeds TD; Gao G; Parsons JE; Martin KE; Evenhuis JP; Fragomeni BO; Wiens GD; Palti Y
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Feb; 49(1):17. PubMed ID: 28148220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of five methods to predict genomic breeding values of dairy bulls from genome-wide SNP markers.
    Moser G; Tier B; Crump RE; Khatkar MS; Raadsma HW
    Genet Sel Evol; 2009 Dec; 41(1):56. PubMed ID: 20043835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Application of single-step genomic evaluation using multiple-trait random regression test-day models in dairy cattle.
    Oliveira HR; Lourenco DAL; Masuda Y; Misztal I; Tsuruta S; Jamrozik J; Brito LF; Silva FF; Schenkel FS
    J Dairy Sci; 2019 Mar; 102(3):2365-2377. PubMed ID: 30638992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Genomic prediction based on data from three layer lines: a comparison between linear methods.
    Calus MP; Huang H; Vereijken A; Visscher J; Ten Napel J; Windig JJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Oct; 46(1):57. PubMed ID: 25927219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multibreed genomic prediction using multitrait genomic residual maximum likelihood and multitask Bayesian variable selection.
    Calus MPL; Goddard ME; Wientjes YCJ; Bowman PJ; Hayes BJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2018 May; 101(5):4279-4294. PubMed ID: 29550121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Genomic prediction using imputed whole-genome sequence data in Holstein Friesian cattle.
    van Binsbergen R; Calus MP; Bink MC; van Eeuwijk FA; Schrooten C; Veerkamp RF
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Sep; 47(1):71. PubMed ID: 26381777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Preliminary investigation on reliability of genomic estimated breeding values in the Danish Holstein population.
    Su G; Guldbrandtsen B; Gregersen VR; Lund MS
    J Dairy Sci; 2010 Mar; 93(3):1175-83. PubMed ID: 20172238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Application of multivariate single-step SNP best linear unbiased predictor model and revised SNP list for genomic evaluation of dairy cattle in Australia.
    Konstantinov KV; Goddard ME
    J Dairy Sci; 2020 Sep; 103(9):8305-8316. PubMed ID: 32622609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Improving accuracy of genomic predictions within and between dairy cattle breeds with imputed high-density single nucleotide polymorphism panels.
    Erbe M; Hayes BJ; Matukumalli LK; Goswami S; Bowman PJ; Reich CM; Mason BA; Goddard ME
    J Dairy Sci; 2012 Jul; 95(7):4114-29. PubMed ID: 22720968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of genomic predictions for lowly heritable traits using multi-step and single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor in Holstein cattle.
    Guarini AR; Lourenco DAL; Brito LF; Sargolzaei M; Baes CF; Miglior F; Misztal I; Schenkel FS
    J Dairy Sci; 2018 Sep; 101(9):8076-8086. PubMed ID: 29935829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Simultaneous fitting of genomic-BLUP and Bayes-C components in a genomic prediction model.
    Iheshiulor OOM; Woolliams JA; Svendsen M; Solberg T; Meuwissen THE
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Aug; 49(1):63. PubMed ID: 28836944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. SNP- and haplotype-based single-step genomic predictions for body weight, wool, and reproductive traits in North American Rambouillet sheep.
    Araujo AC; Carneiro PLS; Oliveira HR; Lewis RM; Brito LF
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2023 Mar; 140(2):216-234. PubMed ID: 36408677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Genomic prediction of lactation curves for milk, fat, protein, and somatic cell score in Holstein cattle.
    Oliveira HR; Brito LF; Silva FF; Lourenco DAL; Jamrozik J; Schenkel FS
    J Dairy Sci; 2019 Jan; 102(1):452-463. PubMed ID: 30391177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of number of training generations on genomic prediction for various traits in a layer chicken population.
    Weng Z; Wolc A; Shen X; Fernando RL; Dekkers JC; Arango J; Settar P; Fulton JE; O'Sullivan NP; Garrick DJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Mar; 48():22. PubMed ID: 26992471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Invited review: Genomic selection in dairy cattle: progress and challenges.
    Hayes BJ; Bowman PJ; Chamberlain AJ; Goddard ME
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Feb; 92(2):433-43. PubMed ID: 19164653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Genomic analysis of cow mortality and milk production using a threshold-linear model.
    Tsuruta S; Lourenco DAL; Misztal I; Lawlor TJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2017 Sep; 100(9):7295-7305. PubMed ID: 28647327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 35.