694 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25928875)
1. Genomic prediction of breeding values using previously estimated SNP variances.
Calus MP; Schrooten C; Veerkamp RF
Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Sep; 46(1):52. PubMed ID: 25928875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Variable selection models for genomic selection using whole-genome sequence data and singular value decomposition.
Meuwissen THE; Indahl UG; Ødegård J
Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Dec; 49(1):94. PubMed ID: 29281962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of genomic predictions using genomic relationship matrices built with different weighting factors to account for locus-specific variances.
Su G; Christensen OF; Janss L; Lund MS
J Dairy Sci; 2014 Oct; 97(10):6547-59. PubMed ID: 25129495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Modeling heterogeneous (co)variances from adjacent-SNP groups improves genomic prediction for milk protein composition traits.
Gebreyesus G; Lund MS; Buitenhuis B; Bovenhuis H; Poulsen NA; Janss LG
Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Dec; 49(1):89. PubMed ID: 29207947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Genomic selection models double the accuracy of predicted breeding values for bacterial cold water disease resistance compared to a traditional pedigree-based model in rainbow trout aquaculture.
Vallejo RL; Leeds TD; Gao G; Parsons JE; Martin KE; Evenhuis JP; Fragomeni BO; Wiens GD; Palti Y
Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Feb; 49(1):17. PubMed ID: 28148220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of five methods to predict genomic breeding values of dairy bulls from genome-wide SNP markers.
Moser G; Tier B; Crump RE; Khatkar MS; Raadsma HW
Genet Sel Evol; 2009 Dec; 41(1):56. PubMed ID: 20043835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Application of single-step genomic evaluation using multiple-trait random regression test-day models in dairy cattle.
Oliveira HR; Lourenco DAL; Masuda Y; Misztal I; Tsuruta S; Jamrozik J; Brito LF; Silva FF; Schenkel FS
J Dairy Sci; 2019 Mar; 102(3):2365-2377. PubMed ID: 30638992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Genomic prediction based on data from three layer lines: a comparison between linear methods.
Calus MP; Huang H; Vereijken A; Visscher J; Ten Napel J; Windig JJ
Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Oct; 46(1):57. PubMed ID: 25927219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Multibreed genomic prediction using multitrait genomic residual maximum likelihood and multitask Bayesian variable selection.
Calus MPL; Goddard ME; Wientjes YCJ; Bowman PJ; Hayes BJ
J Dairy Sci; 2018 May; 101(5):4279-4294. PubMed ID: 29550121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Genomic prediction using imputed whole-genome sequence data in Holstein Friesian cattle.
van Binsbergen R; Calus MP; Bink MC; van Eeuwijk FA; Schrooten C; Veerkamp RF
Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Sep; 47(1):71. PubMed ID: 26381777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Preliminary investigation on reliability of genomic estimated breeding values in the Danish Holstein population.
Su G; Guldbrandtsen B; Gregersen VR; Lund MS
J Dairy Sci; 2010 Mar; 93(3):1175-83. PubMed ID: 20172238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Application of multivariate single-step SNP best linear unbiased predictor model and revised SNP list for genomic evaluation of dairy cattle in Australia.
Konstantinov KV; Goddard ME
J Dairy Sci; 2020 Sep; 103(9):8305-8316. PubMed ID: 32622609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Improving accuracy of genomic predictions within and between dairy cattle breeds with imputed high-density single nucleotide polymorphism panels.
Erbe M; Hayes BJ; Matukumalli LK; Goswami S; Bowman PJ; Reich CM; Mason BA; Goddard ME
J Dairy Sci; 2012 Jul; 95(7):4114-29. PubMed ID: 22720968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of genomic predictions for lowly heritable traits using multi-step and single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor in Holstein cattle.
Guarini AR; Lourenco DAL; Brito LF; Sargolzaei M; Baes CF; Miglior F; Misztal I; Schenkel FS
J Dairy Sci; 2018 Sep; 101(9):8076-8086. PubMed ID: 29935829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Simultaneous fitting of genomic-BLUP and Bayes-C components in a genomic prediction model.
Iheshiulor OOM; Woolliams JA; Svendsen M; Solberg T; Meuwissen THE
Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Aug; 49(1):63. PubMed ID: 28836944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. SNP- and haplotype-based single-step genomic predictions for body weight, wool, and reproductive traits in North American Rambouillet sheep.
Araujo AC; Carneiro PLS; Oliveira HR; Lewis RM; Brito LF
J Anim Breed Genet; 2023 Mar; 140(2):216-234. PubMed ID: 36408677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Genomic prediction of lactation curves for milk, fat, protein, and somatic cell score in Holstein cattle.
Oliveira HR; Brito LF; Silva FF; Lourenco DAL; Jamrozik J; Schenkel FS
J Dairy Sci; 2019 Jan; 102(1):452-463. PubMed ID: 30391177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Development of genomic predictions for Angus cattle in Brazil incorporating genotypes from related American sires.
Campos GS; Cardoso FF; Gomes CCG; Domingues R; de Almeida Regitano LC; de Sena Oliveira MC; de Oliveira HN; Carvalheiro R; Albuquerque LG; Miller S; Misztal I; Lourenco D
J Anim Sci; 2022 Feb; 100(2):. PubMed ID: 35031806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of number of training generations on genomic prediction for various traits in a layer chicken population.
Weng Z; Wolc A; Shen X; Fernando RL; Dekkers JC; Arango J; Settar P; Fulton JE; O'Sullivan NP; Garrick DJ
Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Mar; 48():22. PubMed ID: 26992471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Invited review: Genomic selection in dairy cattle: progress and challenges.
Hayes BJ; Bowman PJ; Chamberlain AJ; Goddard ME
J Dairy Sci; 2009 Feb; 92(2):433-43. PubMed ID: 19164653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
