161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2592934)
1. The American way: get what you can through the political process.
Newmark E
J Fla Med Assoc; 1989 Nov; 76(11):964-6. PubMed ID: 2592934
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Uniting the profession.
Ortolon K
Tex Med; 1999 Apr; 95(4):32-5. PubMed ID: 10217988
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Ophthalmic comanagement and optometry.
Bucar AA
Hindsight; 2014 Apr; 45(2):59-61. PubMed ID: 24941517
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Optometry's scope of practice expansion.
Sabbagh LB
J Refract Surg; 1999; 15(3):377-81. PubMed ID: 10367581
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Clarifying the blur.
Rubin ML
J Fla Med Assoc; 1991 Feb; 78(2):97-104. PubMed ID: 2027000
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Optometry on the march: why should the house of medicine care?
Pernoud JM; Paul RH
Mo Med; 2005; 102(1):10-3. PubMed ID: 15754611
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The current status of ophthalmologic and optometric professional relations within the Veterans Administration hospital system.
Myers KJ
Trans Sect Ophthalmol Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol; 1977; 83(1):149-54. PubMed ID: 898469
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. OIG opinion is cause for concern.
Schanz SJ
Telemed Today; 1999 Feb; 7(1):11. PubMed ID: 10350934
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Reflections on the ups and downs of optometry's relationship with organized medicine and organized ophthalmology.
Haffner AN
Hindsight; 2011 Jan; 42(1):10-3. PubMed ID: 21879535
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Obviate.
Freeman PB
Optometry; 2006 Oct; 77(10):471-2. PubMed ID: 17000408
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. What can we learn from the visual care system of the British National Health Service?
Worthen DM; Fraunfelder FT
Surv Ophthalmol; 1977; 22(1):57-60. PubMed ID: 905945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the problem. Creeping integration.
Eger MJ
J Am Optom Assoc; 1969 Mar; 40(3):260-2. PubMed ID: 5776266
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Conflicts of law and ethics in the practice of optometry.
Classé JG
J Am Optom Assoc; 1994 Jun; 65(6):414-6. PubMed ID: 8089387
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Interprofessional relations-a case report.
Wick RE
J Am Optom Assoc; 1968 Nov; 39(11):1013-4. PubMed ID: 5699483
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. What is the proper integration of optometry and ophthalmology?
Miller SC
J Am Optom Assoc; 1992 Dec; 63(12):830-2. PubMed ID: 1287057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Nonphysician groups push to expand scope of practice.
Carlson B
Manag Care; 2001 Apr; 10(4):19, 23. PubMed ID: 11394362
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Exclusive, idiosyncratic and collective expertise in the interprofessional arena: the case of optometry and eye care in The Netherlands.
Stevens FC; Diederiks JP; Grit F; van der Horst F
Sociol Health Illn; 2007 May; 29(4):481-96. PubMed ID: 17498164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Inter- and intrareferrals within and between Ophthalmology and Optometry.
Refowitz RM
Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1981 Nov; 58(11):939-43. PubMed ID: 7315944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Tax reform legislation and the formation of optometric group practices.
Cobb CH
J Am Optom Assoc; 1989 Feb; 60(2):137-40. PubMed ID: 2703655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Feasibility or fantasy: good interprofessional relations between optometry and ophthalmology.
Ball RJ
Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1976 Jul; 53(7):385-8. PubMed ID: 961821
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
