1304 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25929558)
1. Comparisons of clinical performance of Guardian laryngeal mask with laryngeal mask airway ProSeal.
Pajiyar AK; Wen Z; Wang H; Ma L; Miao L; Wang G
BMC Anesthesiol; 2015 May; 15():69. PubMed ID: 25929558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The laryngeal mask airway Supreme--a single use laryngeal mask airway with an oesophageal vent. A randomised, cross-over study with the laryngeal mask airway ProSeal in paralysed, anaesthetised patients.
Eschertzhuber S; Brimacombe J; Hohlrieder M; Keller C
Anaesthesia; 2009 Jan; 64(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 19087011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Safety and efficacy of laryngeal mask airway Supreme versus laryngeal mask airway ProSeal: a randomized controlled trial.
Seet E; Rajeev S; Firoz T; Yousaf F; Wong J; Wong DT; Chung F
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2010 Jul; 27(7):602-7. PubMed ID: 20540172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Techniques for the insertion of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: comparison of the Foley airway stylet tool with the introducer tool in a prospective, randomized study.
Chen MK; Hsu HT; Lu IC; Shih CK; Shen YC; Tseng KY; Cheng KI
BMC Anesthesiol; 2014; 14():105. PubMed ID: 25435806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of the Supreme and the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A randomized controlled trial.
Anand LK; Goel N; Singh M; Kapoor D
Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan; 2016 Jun; 54(2):44-50. PubMed ID: 27106162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: A randomized, crossover study with the standard laryngeal mask airway in paralyzed, anesthetized patients.
Brimacombe J; Keller C
Anesthesiology; 2000 Jul; 93(1):104-9. PubMed ID: 10861152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme and Laryngeal Mask Airway Proseal with respect to oropharyngeal leak pressure during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomised controlled trial.
Beleña JM; Núñez M; Anta D; Carnero M; Gracia JL; Ayala JL; Alvarez R; Yuste J
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2013 Mar; 30(3):119-23. PubMed ID: 23318811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of the disposable versus the reusable laryngeal mask airway in paralyzed adult patients.
Brimacombe J; Keller C; Morris R; Mecklem D
Anesth Analg; 1998 Oct; 87(4):921-4. PubMed ID: 9768795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prospective clinical and fiberoptic evaluation of the Supreme laryngeal mask airway.
Timmermann A; Cremer S; Eich C; Kazmaier S; Bräuer A; Graf BM; Russo SG
Anesthesiology; 2009 Feb; 110(2):262-5. PubMed ID: 19194153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the LMA-ProSeal and LMA-Classic in children.
Shimbori H; Ono K; Miwa T; Morimura N; Noguchi M; Hiroki K
Br J Anaesth; 2004 Oct; 93(4):528-31. PubMed ID: 15298876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sore throat following three adult supraglottic airway devices: A randomised controlled trial.
L'Hermite J; Dubout E; Bouvet S; Bracoud LH; Cuvillon P; Coussaye JE; Ripart J
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2017 Jul; 34(7):417-424. PubMed ID: 27755181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Gum-elastic bougie-guided insertion of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: a new technique.
Howath A; Brimacombe J; Keller C
Anaesth Intensive Care; 2002 Oct; 30(5):624-7. PubMed ID: 12413264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Stability of the LMA-ProSeal and standard laryngeal mask airway in different head and neck positions: a randomized crossover study.
Brimacombe J; Keller C
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2003 Jan; 20(1):65-9. PubMed ID: 12553391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Self-pressurized air-Q
Ha SH; Kim MS; Suh J; Lee JS
Can J Anaesth; 2018 May; 65(5):543-550. PubMed ID: 29524199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of laryngeal mask airway supreme and laryngeal mask airway proseal for laryngopharyngeal trauma and postoperative morbidity in children.
Aydogmus MT; Eksioglu B; Oba S; Unsal O; Türk HS; Sinikoglu SN; Tug A
Braz J Anesthesiol; 2013; 63(6):445-9. PubMed ID: 24565340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of a new visual stylet (Discopo)-guided laryngeal mask airway placement vs conventional blind technique: a prospective randomized study.
Zhao L; Zhang J; Zhou Q; Jiang W
J Clin Anesth; 2016 Dec; 35():85-89. PubMed ID: 27871600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of the LMA-classic with the new disposable soft seal laryngeal mask in spontaneously breathing adult patients.
Van Zundert AA; Fonck K; Al-Shaikh B; Mortier E
Anesthesiology; 2003 Nov; 99(5):1066-71. PubMed ID: 14576541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Laryngeal mask airway ProSeal provides higher oropharyngeal leak pressure than i-gel in adult patients under general anesthesia: a meta-analysis.
Maitra S; Baidya DK; Arora MK; Bhattacharjee S; Khanna P
J Clin Anesth; 2016 Sep; 33():298-305. PubMed ID: 27555181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Comparison of the efficacy of different types of laryngeal mask airways in patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecological surgery].
Shi YB; Zuo MZ; Du XH; Yu Z
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Jul; 93(25):1978-80. PubMed ID: 24169248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison between LMA-Classic and AMBU AuraOnce laryngeal mask airway in patients undergoing elective general anaesthesia with positive pressure ventilation.
Suzanna AB; Liu CY; Rozaidi SW; Ooi JS
Med J Malaysia; 2011 Oct; 66(4):304-7. PubMed ID: 22299547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
