These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2593037)

  • 1. [Frequency specificity of ABR evaluated by tuning curves].
    Horiuchi Y
    Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 1989 Nov; 92(11):1895-910. PubMed ID: 2593037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Frequency tuning curves derived from auditory steady state evoked potentials: a proof-of-concept study.
    Markessis E; Poncelet L; Colin C; Coppens A; Hoonhorst I; Kadhim H; Deltenre P
    Ear Hear; 2009 Feb; 30(1):43-53. PubMed ID: 19125026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. ABR measurements in the cat using a forward-masking paradigm.
    Gorga MP; McGee J; Walsh EJ; Javel E; Farley GR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Jan; 73(1):256-61. PubMed ID: 6826893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Tuning of the auditory brainstem OFF responses is complementary to tuning of the auditory brainstem ON response.
    Henry KR
    Hear Res; 1985; 19(2):115-25. PubMed ID: 4055531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Auditory brain stem responses from human adults and infants: wave V tuning curves.
    Folsom RC; Wynne MK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Feb; 81(2):412-7. PubMed ID: 3558957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Response enhancement and reduction of the auditory brain-stem response in a forward-masking paradigm.
    Ananthanarayan AK; Gerken GM
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1987 Apr; 66(4):427-39. PubMed ID: 2435523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Linearized response growth inferred from growth-of-masking slopes in ears with cochlear hearing loss.
    Nelson DA; Schroder AC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Apr; 101(4):2186-201. PubMed ID: 9104021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Offset tuning curves generated by simultaneous masking are more finely tuned than those generated by forward masking.
    Henry KR
    Hear Res; 1986; 24(2):151-61. PubMed ID: 3771377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of AP and ABR tuning curves in the guinea pig.
    Brown CJ; Abbas PJ
    Hear Res; 1987; 25(2-3):193-204. PubMed ID: 3558128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. High-level psychophysical tuning curves: simultaneous masking by pure tones and 100-Hz-wide noise bands.
    Nelson DA; Fortune TW
    J Speech Hear Res; 1991 Apr; 34(2):360-73. PubMed ID: 2046360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Properties of the brain-stem response slow-wave component. II. Frequency specificity.
    Klein AJ
    Arch Otolaryngol; 1983 Feb; 109(2):74-8. PubMed ID: 6849669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Peripheral compression as a function of stimulus level and frequency region in normal-hearing listeners.
    Nelson DA; Schroder AC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 May; 115(5 Pt 1):2221-33. PubMed ID: 15139633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A new procedure for measuring peripheral compression in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Nelson DA; Schroder AC; Wojtczak M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Oct; 110(4):2045-64. PubMed ID: 11681384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Psychophysical assessment of spatial spread of excitation in electrical hearing with single and dual electrode contact maskers.
    Dingemanse JG; Frijns JH; Briaire JJ
    Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):645-57. PubMed ID: 17086076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The development of frequency resolution in humans as revealed by the auditory brain-stem response recorded with notched-noise masking.
    Abdala C; Folsom RC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Aug; 98(2 Pt 1):921-30. PubMed ID: 7642831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Forward masking of auditory nerve fiber responses.
    Harris DM; Dallos P
    J Neurophysiol; 1979 Jul; 42(4):1083-1107. PubMed ID: 479921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Frequency selectivity of the middle latency response.
    Smith DI; Mills JH; Schmiedt RA
    Hear Res; 1990 Jan; 43(2-3):95-105. PubMed ID: 2312419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Effect of stimulus rise time and high-pass masking on early auditory evoked potentials].
    Bunke D; von Specht H; Mühler R; Pethe J; Kevanishvili Z
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1998 Apr; 77(4):185-90. PubMed ID: 9592750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of stimulus level on forward-masked psychophysical tuning curves in quiet and in noise.
    Nelson DA; Chargo SJ; Kopun JG; Freyman RL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Nov; 88(5):2143-51. PubMed ID: 2269730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Estimation of the slope of the audiogram with the auditory brain stem response.
    Debruyne F
    Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci; 1984 Dec; 9(6):341-5. PubMed ID: 6532605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.