BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

355 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25931170)

  • 21. Comparison of the ETDRS logMAR, 'compact reduced logMar' and Snellen charts in routine clinical practice.
    Lim LA; Frost NA; Powell RJ; Hewson P
    Eye (Lond); 2010 Apr; 24(4):673-7. PubMed ID: 19557025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The influence of varying the number of characters per row on the accuracy and reproducibility of the ETDRS visual acuity chart.
    Shamir RR; Friedman YG; Joskowicz L; Mimouni M; Blumenthal EZ
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2016 May; 254(5):971-6. PubMed ID: 26743750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Novel method for analyzing snellen visual acuity measurements.
    Gregori NZ; Feuer W; Rosenfeld PJ
    Retina; 2010; 30(7):1046-50. PubMed ID: 20559157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Construction and validation of a Tamil logMAR chart.
    Varadharajan S; Srinivasan K; Kumaresan B
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2009 Sep; 29(5):526-534. PubMed ID: 19689549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Visual Acuity Testing for Telehealth Using Mobile Applications.
    Steren BJ; Young B; Chow J
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2021 Mar; 139(3):344-347. PubMed ID: 33443550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Standardisation of optotypes].
    Bujger Z; Picman J; Lukenda A; Petricek I
    Lijec Vjesn; 2010; 132(7-8):252-6. PubMed ID: 20857812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Construction and validation of logMAR visual acuity charts in seven Indian languages.
    Negiloni K; Mazumdar D; Neog A; Das B; Medhi J; Choudhury M; George RJ; Ramani KK
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2018 May; 66(5):641-646. PubMed ID: 29676305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The Thai logarithmic visual acuity chart.
    Ruamviboonsuk P; Tiensuwan M
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2002 Jun; 85(6):673-81. PubMed ID: 12322840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effect of scoring and termination rules on test-retest variability of a novel high-pass letter acuity chart.
    Shah N; Dakin SC; Whitaker HL; Anderson RS
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2014 Mar; 55(3):1386-92. PubMed ID: 24519424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A standardized logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution visual acuity chart in Hindi.
    Sailoganathan A; Osuobeni EP; Siderov J
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2018 May; 66(5):634-640. PubMed ID: 29676304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Mobile app reading speed test.
    Kingsnorth A; Wolffsohn JS
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2015 Apr; 99(4):536-9. PubMed ID: 25355805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Automated determination of distance visual acuity: towards teleophthalmology services.
    Kumar S; Bulsara M; Yogesan K
    Clin Exp Optom; 2008 Nov; 91(6):545-50. PubMed ID: 18430039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Ease and Willingness to Use Smartphone Applications for Visual Acuity Assessment Among Patients in Ahmadu Bello University Teaching Hospital, Zaria.
    Peter EN; Abah ER; Oladigbolu KK; Samaila E; Garba F; Zubairu AE
    J West Afr Coll Surg; 2021; 11(4):13-17. PubMed ID: 36188057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Design and Validation of a Novel Smartphone-Based Visual Acuity Test: The K-VA Test.
    Karampatakis V; Almaliotis D; Talimtzi P; Almpanidou S
    Ophthalmol Ther; 2023 Jun; 12(3):1657-1670. PubMed ID: 36961662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Validation of visual acuity applications for teleophthalmology during COVID-19.
    Satgunam P; Thakur M; Sachdeva V; Reddy S; Rani PK
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2021 Feb; 69(2):385-390. PubMed ID: 33380619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The good (logMAR), the bad (Snellen) and the ugly (BCVA, number of letters read) of visual acuity measurement.
    Elliott DB
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2016 Jul; 36(4):355-8. PubMed ID: 27350181
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Random measurement error in visual acuity measurement in clinical settings.
    Leinonen J; Laakkonen E; Laatikainen L
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2005 Jun; 83(3):328-32. PubMed ID: 15948786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of applicability of different visual acuity charts for pediatric outpatient visual tests.
    Fang H; Diao H; Chen L; Zeng J
    Eye Sci; 2014 Jun; 29(2):90-4. PubMed ID: 26011958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of LogMAR Eye charts with angular vision for visually impaired: the Berkeley rudimentary vision test vs LogMAR One target Landolt ring Eye chart.
    Miwa M; Iwanami M; Oba MS; Mizuki N; Nishida T
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2013 Dec; 251(12):2761-7. PubMed ID: 24057176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Comparison of the threshold interpolation and whole-line method on logMAR chart and Snellen chart for visual acuity testing].
    Veselý P; Ventruba J
    Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2009 Oct; 65(5):191-4. PubMed ID: 20052823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.