These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2593175)

  • 21. Three-dimensional QSAR using the k-nearest neighbor method and its interpretation.
    Ajmani S; Jadhav K; Kulkarni SA
    J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 16426036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. An analysis of genetic toxicity, reproductive and developmental toxicity, and carcinogenicity data: II. Identification of genotoxicants, reprotoxicants, and carcinogens using in silico methods.
    Matthews EJ; Kruhlak NL; Cimino MC; Benz RD; Contrera JF
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2006 Mar; 44(2):97-110. PubMed ID: 16352383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Carcinogenicity prediction and battery selection procedure: an in-depth analysis of cyclamate and its major metabolite cyclohexylamine.
    Haimes YY; Chankong V; Pet-Edwards J; Rosenkranz HR
    Mol Toxicol; 1987; 1(1):49-60. PubMed ID: 2452976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The mouse carcinogenicity study is no longer a scientifically justifiable core data requirement for the safety assessment of pesticides.
    Billington R; Lewis RW; Mehta JM; Dewhurst I
    Crit Rev Toxicol; 2010 Jan; 40(1):35-49. PubMed ID: 20144135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Interlaboratory evaluation of genomic signatures for predicting carcinogenicity in the rat.
    Fielden MR; Nie A; McMillian M; Elangbam CS; Trela BA; Yang Y; Dunn RT; Dragan Y; Fransson-Stehen R; Bogdanffy M; Adams SP; Foster WR; Chen SJ; Rossi P; Kasper P; Jacobson-Kram D; Tatsuoka KS; Wier PJ; Gollub J; Halbert DN; Roter A; Young JK; Sina JF; Marlowe J; Martus HJ; Aubrecht J; Olaharski AJ; Roome N; Nioi P; Pardo I; Snyder R; Perry R; Lord P; Mattes W; Car BD; ;
    Toxicol Sci; 2008 May; 103(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 18281259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Methodologies for interpretation of short-term test results which may allow reduction in the use of animals in carcinogenicity testing.
    Ennever FK; Rosenkranz HS
    Toxicol Ind Health; 1988 Jun; 4(2):137-49. PubMed ID: 3140422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Ratio estimates, the delta method, and quantal response tests for increased carcinogenicity.
    Bieler GS; Williams RL
    Biometrics; 1993 Sep; 49(3):793-801. PubMed ID: 8241374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Assessment of four statistical pattern recognition techniques to assist in obstructive sleep apnoea diagnosis from nocturnal oximetry.
    Marcos JV; Hornero R; Alvarez D; del Campo F; Zamarrón C
    Med Eng Phys; 2009 Oct; 31(8):971-8. PubMed ID: 19592290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Prediction of rodent carcinogenic potential of naturally occurring chemicals in the human diet using high-throughput QSAR predictive modeling.
    Valerio LG; Arvidson KB; Chanderbhan RF; Contrera JF
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2007 Jul; 222(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 17482223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Poly-k-trend tests for survival adjusted analysis of tumor rates formulated as approximate multiple contrast test.
    Schaarschmidt F; Sill M; Hothorn LA
    J Biopharm Stat; 2008; 18(5):934-48. PubMed ID: 18781526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Fisher discriminant analysis for carcinogenic potency of aromatic amines].
    Zhu Y; Yu Y; Chen X
    Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1999 Jan; 33(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 11864450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A pilot study on the application of statistical classification procedures to molecular epidemiological data.
    Schwender H; Zucknick M; Ickstadt K; Bolt HM;
    Toxicol Lett; 2004 Jun; 151(1):291-9. PubMed ID: 15177665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A comparison of transcriptomic and metabonomic technologies for identifying biomarkers predictive of two-year rodent cancer bioassays.
    Thomas RS; O'Connell TM; Pluta L; Wolfinger RD; Yang L; Page TJ
    Toxicol Sci; 2007 Mar; 96(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 17114358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Weighted multiplicity adjustments for animal carcinogenicity tests.
    Westfall PH; Soper KA
    J Biopharm Stat; 1998 Mar; 8(1):23-44; discussion 45-53. PubMed ID: 9547426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Supervised self-organizing maps in drug discovery. 1. Robust behavior with overdetermined data sets.
    Xiao YD; Clauset A; Harris R; Bayram E; Santago P; Schmitt JD
    J Chem Inf Model; 2005; 45(6):1749-58. PubMed ID: 16309281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of HepG2 and HepaRG by whole-genome gene expression analysis for the purpose of chemical hazard identification.
    Jennen DG; Magkoufopoulou C; Ketelslegers HB; van Herwijnen MH; Kleinjans JC; van Delft JH
    Toxicol Sci; 2010 May; 115(1):66-79. PubMed ID: 20106945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Predicting carcinogenicity by using batteries of dependent short-term tests.
    Kim BS; Margolin BH
    Environ Health Perspect; 1994 Jan; 102 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):127-30. PubMed ID: 8187701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Invited contribution: an objective approach to the development of short-term tests predictive of carcinogenicity.
    Rosenkranz HS; Ennever FK; Chankong V; Pet-Edwards J; Haimes YY
    Cell Biol Toxicol; 1986 Dec; 2(4):425-40. PubMed ID: 3077082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Historical perspective on the use of animal bioassays to predict carcinogenicity: evolution in design and recognition of utility.
    Beyer LA; Beck BD; Lewandowski TA
    Crit Rev Toxicol; 2011 Apr; 41(4):321-38. PubMed ID: 21438739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The challenge of testing chemicals for potential carcinogenicity using multiple short-term assays: an analysis of a proposed test battery for hair dyes.
    Rosenkranz HS; Cunningham SL; Mermelstein R; Cunningham AR
    Mutat Res; 2007 Sep; 633(1):55-66. PubMed ID: 17625954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.