These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25931836)
41. BI-RADS Category 5 Assessments at Diagnostic Breast Imaging:Outcomes Analysis Based on Lesion Descriptors. Yao MM; Joe BN; Sickles EA; Lee CS Acad Radiol; 2019 Aug; 26(8):1048-1052. PubMed ID: 30195413 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Role of second-look ultrasound examinations for MR-detected lesions in patients with breast cancer. Lee SH; Kim SM; Jang M; Yun BL; Kang E; Kim SW; Park SY; Ahn HS; Chang JH; Yoo Y; Song TK; Moon WK Ultraschall Med; 2015 Apr; 36(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 25750138 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Focal breast pain: imaging evaluation and outcomes. Owen WA; Brazeal HA; Shaw HL; Lee MV; Appleton CM; Holley SO Clin Imaging; 2019; 55():148-155. PubMed ID: 30825809 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. First ultrasound diagnosis of BI-RADS 3 lesions in young patients: Can 6-months follow-up be sufficient to assess stability? Marcon M; Frauenfelder T; Becker AS; Dedes KJ; Boss A Eur J Radiol; 2017 Apr; 89():226-233. PubMed ID: 28267544 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Reliability of Breast Ultrasound BI-RADS Final Assessment in Mammographically Negative Patients with Nipple Discharge and Radiologic Predictors of Malignancy. Park CJ; Kim EK; Moon HJ; Yoon JH; Kim MJ J Breast Cancer; 2016 Sep; 19(3):308-315. PubMed ID: 27721881 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Value of mammography and breast ultrasound in male patients with nipple discharge. Muñoz Carrasco R; Álvarez Benito M; Rivin del Campo E Eur J Radiol; 2013 Mar; 82(3):478-84. PubMed ID: 23182522 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. [Neddle-guided biopsy in the diagnosis of non-palpable breast cancer]. Becerra-Alcántara GI; Círigo-Villagómez LL; Ramos-Medina F; Robledo-Martínez H; Mar-Merinos CG; Panzi-Altamirano RM Ginecol Obstet Mex; 2015 Jul; 83(7):400-7. PubMed ID: 26422910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Breast clinic referrals: can mastalgia be managed in primary care? Joyce DP; Alamiri J; Lowery AJ; Downey E; Ahmed A; McLaughlin R; Hill AD Ir J Med Sci; 2014 Dec; 183(4):639-42. PubMed ID: 24402166 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Probably Benign Breast Nodular Lesions (BI-RADS 3): Correlation between Ultrasound Features and Histologic Findings. Pistolese CA; Tosti D; Citraro D; Ricci F; Di Stefano C; Lamacchia F; Ferrari D; Floris R Ultrasound Med Biol; 2019 Jan; 45(1):78-84. PubMed ID: 30340921 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Mastalgia Due to Degenerative Changes of the Spine. Pirti O; Barlas AM; Kuru S; Temel S; Urhan MK; Kismet K; Hasanoglu A; Guler O Adv Clin Exp Med; 2016; 25(5):895-900. PubMed ID: 28028952 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Factors Effecting Mastalgia. Eren T; Aslan A; Ozemir IA; Baysal H; Sagiroglu J; Ekinci O; Alimoglu O Breast Care (Basel); 2016 Jun; 11(3):188-93. PubMed ID: 27493619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. [Performance of users in tropical areas with the BI-RADS classification of breast lesions for predicting malignancy]. Gonsu Kamga JE; Moifo B; Sando Z; Guegang Goudjou E; Nko'o Amvene S; Gonsu Fotsin J Med Sante Trop; 2013; 23(4):439-44. PubMed ID: 24334372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Breast Diagnosis: Concordance Analysis Between the BI-RADS Classification and Tsukuba Sonoelastography Score. Duma MM; Chiorean AR; Chiorean M; Bolboaca SD; Florea M; Feier DS; Rusu GM; Sfrangeu SA Clujul Med; 2014; 87(4):250-7. PubMed ID: 26528032 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Sonographic features of histopathologically benign solid breast lesions that have been classified as BI-RADS 4 on sonography. Taskin F; Koseoglu K; Ozbas S; Erkus M; Karaman C J Clin Ultrasound; 2012 Jun; 40(5):261-5. PubMed ID: 22508447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Synchronous BI-RADS Category 3 Lesions on Preoperative Ultrasonography in Patients with Breast Cancer: Is Short-Term Follow-Up Appropriate? Lee S; Jung Y; Bae Y J Breast Cancer; 2015 Jun; 18(2):181-6. PubMed ID: 26155295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Role of breast MR imaging for predicting malignancy of histologically borderline lesions diagnosed at core needle biopsy: prospective evaluation. Pediconi F; Padula S; Dominelli V; Luciani M; Telesca M; Casali V; Kirchin MA; Passariello R; Catalano C Radiology; 2010 Dec; 257(3):653-61. PubMed ID: 20884914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Is it Necessary to Excise All Breast Lesions? Experience from a University-Based Breast Unit. Ng CH; Nur-Aishah T; Yip CH Malays Fam Physician; 2009; 4(2-3):66-70. PubMed ID: 25606166 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. [Second reading of breast imaging at the hospital department of radiology: reasonable or waste of money?]. Teifke A; Vomweg TW; Hlawatsch A; Nasresfahani A; Kern A; Victor A; Schmidt M; Bittinger F; Düber C Rofo; 2006 Mar; 178(3):330-6. PubMed ID: 16508842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]