513 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25932601)
1. Determination of the biomechanical effect of an interspinous process device on implanted and adjacent lumbar spinal segments using a hybrid testing protocol: a finite-element study.
Erbulut DU; Zafarparandeh I; Hassan CR; Lazoglu I; Ozer AF
J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Aug; 23(2):200-8. PubMed ID: 25932601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanical effects of hybrid stabilization on the risk of proximal adjacent-segment degeneration following lumbar spinal fusion using an interspinous device or a pedicle screw-based dynamic fixator.
Lee CH; Kim YE; Lee HJ; Kim DG; Kim CH
J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Dec; 27(6):643-649. PubMed ID: 28937328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical comparison of an interspinous device and a rigid stabilization on lumbar adjacent segment range of motion.
Hartmann F; Dietz SO; Kuhn S; Hely H; Rommens PM; Gercek E
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2011; 78(5):404-9. PubMed ID: 22094153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanical comparison of single-level posterior versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions with bilateral pedicle screw fixation: segmental stability and the effects on adjacent motion segments.
Sim HB; Murovic JA; Cho BY; Lim TJ; Park J
J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Jun; 12(6):700-8. PubMed ID: 20515358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of charité artificial disc on the implanted and adjacent spinal segments mechanics using a hybrid testing protocol.
Goel VK; Grauer JN; Patel TCh; Biyani A; Sairyo K; Vishnubhotla S; Matyas A; Cowgill I; Shaw M; Long R; Dick D; Panjabi MM; Serhan H
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Dec; 30(24):2755-64. PubMed ID: 16371899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the effects of bilateral posterior dynamic and rigid fixation devices on the loads in the lumbar spine: a finite element analysis.
Rohlmann A; Burra NK; Zander T; Bergmann G
Eur Spine J; 2007 Aug; 16(8):1223-31. PubMed ID: 17206401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of lumbar total disc arthroplasty on the segmental motion and intradiscal pressure at the adjacent level: an in vitro biomechanical study: presented at the 2008 Joint Spine Section Meeting Laboratory investigation.
Ingalhalikar AV; Reddy CG; Lim TH; Torner JC; Hitchon PW
J Neurosurg Spine; 2009 Dec; 11(6):715-23. PubMed ID: 19951025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Kinematic evaluation of one- and two-level Maverick lumbar total disc replacement caudal to a long thoracolumbar spinal fusion.
Zhu Q; Itshayek E; Jones CF; Schwab T; Larson CR; Lenke LG; Cripton PA
Eur Spine J; 2012 Jun; 21 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S599-611. PubMed ID: 22531900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical evaluation of a new pedicle screw-based posterior dynamic stabilization device (Awesome Rod System)--a finite element analysis.
Chen CS; Huang CH; Shih SL
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2015 Apr; 16():81. PubMed ID: 25880231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical Effect of L
Cai XY; Sun MS; Huang YP; Liu ZX; Liu CJ; Du CF; Yang Q
Orthop Surg; 2020 Jun; 12(3):917-930. PubMed ID: 32476282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomechanical characteristics of a novel interspinous distraction fusion device in the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases: a finite element analysis.
Chen M; Deng J; Bao L; Jia P; Feng F; Shi G; Tang H; Chen H
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2023 Dec; 24(1):944. PubMed ID: 38057738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomechanical Analysis of Different Lumbar Interspinous Process Devices: A Finite Element Study.
Shen H; Fogel GR; Zhu J; Liao Z; Liu W
World Neurosurg; 2019 Jul; 127():e1112-e1119. PubMed ID: 30980982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Hybrid dynamic stabilization: a biomechanical assessment of adjacent and supraadjacent levels of the lumbar spine.
Mageswaran P; Techy F; Colbrunn RW; Bonner TF; McLain RF
J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Sep; 17(3):232-42. PubMed ID: 22839756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanical analysis of a newly developed interspinous process device conjunction with interbody cage based on a finite element model.
Bae IS; Bak KH; Chun HJ; Ryu JI; Park SJ; Lee SJ
PLoS One; 2020; 15(12):e0243771. PubMed ID: 33306706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of follower load on the range of motion, facet joint force, and intradiscal pressure of the cervical spine: a finite element study.
Cai XY; YuChi CX; Du CF; Mo ZJ
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2020 Aug; 58(8):1695-1705. PubMed ID: 32462554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biomechanical evaluation of the kinematics of the cadaver lumbar spine following disc replacement with the ProDisc-L prosthesis.
Demetropoulos CK; Sengupta DK; Knaub MA; Wiater BP; Abjornson C; Truumees E; Herkowitz HN
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Jan; 35(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 20042953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanical assessment of a novel L4/5 level interspinous implant using three dimensional finite element analysis.
Song C; Li XF; Liu ZD; Zhong GB
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2014; 18(1):86-94. PubMed ID: 24452948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanics of two-level Charité artificial disc placement in comparison to fusion plus single-level disc placement combination.
Grauer JN; Biyani A; Faizan A; Kiapour A; Sairyo K; Ivanov A; Ebraheim NA; Patel TCh; Goel VK
Spine J; 2006; 6(6):659-66. PubMed ID: 17088196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Does oblique lumbar interbody fusion promote adjacent degeneration in degenerative disc disease: A finite element analysis.
Du CF; Cai XY; Gui W; Sun MS; Liu ZX; Liu CJ; Zhang CQ; Huang YP
Comput Biol Med; 2021 Jan; 128():104122. PubMed ID: 33248365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of multilevel lumbar disc arthroplasty on the operative- and adjacent-level kinematics and intradiscal pressures: an in vitro human cadaveric assessment.
Dmitriev AE; Gill NW; Kuklo TR; Rosner MK
Spine J; 2008; 8(6):918-25. PubMed ID: 18178528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
