These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25932664)

  • 1. Testing the Factor Structure and Measurement Invariance Across Gender of the Big Five Inventory Through Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling.
    Chiorri C; Marsh HW; Ubbiali A; Donati D
    J Pers Assess; 2016; 98(1):88-99. PubMed ID: 25932664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A new look at the big five factor structure through exploratory structural equation modeling.
    Marsh HW; Lüdtke O; Muthén B; Asparouhov T; Morin AJ; Trautwein U; Nagengast B
    Psychol Assess; 2010 Sep; 22(3):471-91. PubMed ID: 20822261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Measurement invariance of big-five factors over the life span: ESEM tests of gender, age, plasticity, maturity, and la dolce vita effects.
    Marsh HW; Nagengast B; Morin AJS
    Dev Psychol; 2013 Jun; 49(6):1194-1218. PubMed ID: 22250996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Exploratory structural equation modeling: an integration of the best features of exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis.
    Marsh HW; Morin AJ; Parker PD; Kaur G
    Annu Rev Clin Psychol; 2014; 10():85-110. PubMed ID: 24313568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Validation of the French version of the 10-item Big Five Inventory].
    Courtois R; Petot JM; Plaisant O; Allibe B; Lignier B; Réveillère C; Lecocq G; John O
    Encephale; 2020 Dec; 46(6):455-462. PubMed ID: 32331765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Exploratory structural equation modeling of personality data.
    Booth T; Hughes DJ
    Assessment; 2014 Jun; 21(3):260-71. PubMed ID: 24682748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The NEO Personality Inventory-Revised: factor structure and gender invariance from exploratory structural equation modeling analyses in a high-stakes setting.
    Furnham A; Guenole N; Levine SZ; Chamorro-Premuzic T
    Assessment; 2013 Feb; 20(1):14-23. PubMed ID: 22837539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Why item parcels are (almost) never appropriate: two wrongs do not make a right--camouflaging misspecification with item parcels in CFA models.
    Marsh HW; Lüdtke O; Nagengast B; Morin AJ; Von Davier M
    Psychol Methods; 2013 Sep; 18(3):257-84. PubMed ID: 23834417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Factorial invariance of the Five-Factor Model Rating Form across gender.
    Samuel DB; South SC; Griffin SA
    Assessment; 2015 Feb; 22(1):65-75. PubMed ID: 24891427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Practical Effects of Measurement Invariance: Gender Invariance in Two Big Five Personality Measures.
    Ock J; McAbee ST; Mulfinger E; Oswald FL
    Assessment; 2020 Jun; 27(4):657-674. PubMed ID: 31684745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Psychometric Evaluation of Chinese-Language 44-Item and 10-Item Big Five Personality Inventories, Including Correlations with Chronotype, Mindfulness and Mind Wandering.
    Carciofo R; Yang J; Song N; Du F; Zhang K
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0149963. PubMed ID: 26918618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling (ESEM), and Set-ESEM: Optimal Balance Between Goodness of Fit and Parsimony.
    Marsh HW; Guo J; Dicke T; Parker PD; Craven RG
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2020; 55(1):102-119. PubMed ID: 31204844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Chronic Time Pressure Inventory: further assessment of factorial structure and validity.
    Denovan A; Dagnall N; Drinkwater K
    PeerJ; 2024; 12():e17373. PubMed ID: 38708348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Gender-based measurement invariance of the substance use risk profile scale.
    Memetovic J; Ratner PA; Richardson CG
    Addict Behav; 2014 Mar; 39(3):690-4. PubMed ID: 24296151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Measurement Invariance and Sex and Age Differences of the Big Five Inventory-2: Evidence From the Russian Version.
    Shchebetenko S; Kalugin AY; Mishkevich AM; Soto CJ; John OP
    Assessment; 2020 Apr; 27(3):472-486. PubMed ID: 31286794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Testing measurement invariance across Spanish and English versions of the physical self-description questionnaire: an application of exploratory structural equation modeling.
    Tomás I; Marsh HW; González-Romá V; Valls V; Nagengast B
    J Sport Exerc Psychol; 2014 Apr; 36(2):179-88. PubMed ID: 24686954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Validation of an Italian version of the Oxford happiness inventory in adolescence.
    Meleddu M; Guicciardi M; Scalas LF; Fadda D
    J Pers Assess; 2012; 94(2):175-85. PubMed ID: 22339310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Development and validation of a Dutch translation of the Big Five Inventory (BFI).
    Denissen JJ; Geenen R; van Aken MA; Gosling SD; Potter J
    J Pers Assess; 2008 Mar; 90(2):152-7. PubMed ID: 18444109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Internal Structure of Responses to the Trait Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire-Short Form: An Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling Approach.
    Perera HN
    J Pers Assess; 2015; 97(4):411-23. PubMed ID: 25774661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Is personality assessment with the French Big Five Inventory (BFI-Fr) invariant according to gender and activity of the respondents?].
    Lignier B; Lheureux F
    Encephale; 2022 Feb; 48(1):52-59. PubMed ID: 33892921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.