These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

583 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25932791)

  • 1. Accurate and reproducible reconstruction of coronary arteries and endothelial shear stress calculation using 3D OCT: comparative study to 3D IVUS and 3D QCA.
    Toutouzas K; Chatzizisis YS; Riga M; Giannopoulos A; Antoniadis AP; Tu S; Fujino Y; Mitsouras D; Doulaverakis C; Tsampoulatidis I; Koutkias VG; Bouki K; Li Y; Chouvarda I; Cheimariotis G; Maglaveras N; Kompatsiaris I; Nakamura S; Reiber JH; Rybicki F; Karvounis H; Stefanadis C; Tousoulis D; Giannoglou GD
    Atherosclerosis; 2015 Jun; 240(2):510-9. PubMed ID: 25932791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Anatomically correct three-dimensional coronary artery reconstruction using frequency domain optical coherence tomographic and angiographic data: head-to-head comparison with intravascular ultrasound for endothelial shear stress assessment in humans.
    Papafaklis MI; Bourantas CV; Yonetsu T; Vergallo R; Kotsia A; Nakatani S; Lakkas LS; Athanasiou LS; Naka KK; Fotiadis DI; Feldman CL; Stone PH; Serruys PW; Jang IK; Michalis LK
    EuroIntervention; 2015 Aug; 11(4):407-15. PubMed ID: 24974809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. OCT compared with IVUS in a coronary lesion assessment: the OPUS-CLASS study.
    Kubo T; Akasaka T; Shite J; Suzuki T; Uemura S; Yu B; Kozuma K; Kitabata H; Shinke T; Habara M; Saito Y; Hou J; Suzuki N; Zhang S
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Oct; 6(10):1095-1104. PubMed ID: 24011777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In vivo comparison of arterial lumen dimensions assessed by co-registered three-dimensional (3D) quantitative coronary angiography, intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography.
    Tu S; Xu L; Ligthart J; Xu B; Witberg K; Sun Z; Koning G; Reiber JH; Regar E
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Aug; 28(6):1315-27. PubMed ID: 22261998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Angiographic derived endothelial shear stress: a new predictor of atherosclerotic disease progression.
    Bourantas CV; Ramasamy A; Karagiannis A; Sakellarios A; Zanchin T; Yamaji K; Ueki Y; Shen X; Fotiadis DI; Michalis LK; Mathur A; Serruys PW; Garcia-Garcia HM; Koskinas K; Torii R; Windecker S; Räber L
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Mar; 20(3):314-322. PubMed ID: 30020435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In vivo validation of CAAS QCA-3D coronary reconstruction using fusion of angiography and intravascular ultrasound (ANGUS).
    Schuurbiers JC; Lopez NG; Ligthart J; Gijsen FJ; Dijkstra J; Serruys PW; Van der Steen AF; Wentzel JJ
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2009 Apr; 73(5):620-6. PubMed ID: 19309696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of coronary lumen reconstruction on the estimation of endothelial shear stress: in vivo comparison of three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography and three-dimensional fusion combining optical coherent tomography.
    Kweon J; Kang SJ; Kim YH; Lee JG; Han S; Ha H; Yang DH; Kang JW; Lim TH; Kwon O; Ahn JM; Lee PH; Park DW; Lee SW; Lee CW; Park SW; Park SJ
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Oct; 19(10):1134-1141. PubMed ID: 29028985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of angiographic and IVUS derived coronary geometric reconstructions for evaluation of the association of hemodynamics with coronary artery disease progression.
    Timmins LH; Suo J; Eshtehardi P; Molony DS; McDaniel MC; Oshinski JN; Giddens DP; Samady H
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Sep; 32(9):1327-1336. PubMed ID: 27229349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A novel three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography system: In-vivo comparison with intravascular ultrasound for assessing arterial segment length.
    Tu S; Huang Z; Koning G; Cui K; Reiber JH
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2010 Aug; 76(2):291-8. PubMed ID: 20665880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison between three-dimensional angiographic reconstruction and intravascular ultrasound: imaging of the left main coronary artery.
    Spoon DB; Rubinshtein R; Psaltis PJ; Sandhu GS; Lennon R; Rihal CS; Lerman A
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Jun; 81(7):1156-61. PubMed ID: 23436576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A new methodology for accurate 3-dimensional coronary artery reconstruction using routine intravascular ultrasound and angiographic data: implications for widespread assessment of endothelial shear stress in humans.
    Bourantas CV; Papafaklis MI; Athanasiou L; Kalatzis FG; Naka KK; Siogkas PK; Takahashi S; Saito S; Fotiadis DI; Feldman CL; Stone PH; Michalis LK
    EuroIntervention; 2013 Sep; 9(5):582-93. PubMed ID: 23608530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Interstudy reproducibility of the second generation, Fourier domain optical coherence tomography in patients with coronary artery disease and comparison with intravascular ultrasound: a study applying automated contour detection.
    Jamil Z; Tearney G; Bruining N; Sihan K; van Soest G; Ligthart J; van Domburg R; Bouma B; Regar E
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Jan; 29(1):39-51. PubMed ID: 22639296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fusion of 3D QCA and IVUS/OCT.
    Tu S; Holm NR; Koning G; Huang Z; Reiber JH
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2011 Feb; 27(2):197-207. PubMed ID: 21264684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A new method for real-time co-registration of 3D coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound or optical coherence tomography.
    Carlier S; Didday R; Slots T; Kayaert P; Sonck J; El-Mourad M; Preumont N; Schoors D; Van Camp G
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2014 Jun; 15(4):226-32. PubMed ID: 24746102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of longitudinal geometric measurement in human coronary arteries between frequency-domain optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound.
    Liu Y; Shimamura K; Kubo T; Tanaka A; Kitabata H; Ino Y; Tanimoto T; Shiono Y; Orii M; Yamano T; Yamaguchi T; Hirata K; Imanishi T; Akasaka T
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Feb; 30(2):271-7. PubMed ID: 24272334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment of three dimensional quantitative coronary analysis by using rotational angiography for measurement of vessel length and diameter.
    Lee JB; Chang SG; Kim SY; Lee YS; Ryu JK; Choi JY; Kim KS; Park JS
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Oct; 28(7):1627-34. PubMed ID: 22179945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Variability in quantitative and qualitative analysis of intravascular ultrasound and frequency domain optical coherence tomography.
    Abnousi F; Waseda K; Kume T; Otake H; Kawarada O; Yong CM; Fitzgerald PJ; Honda Y; Yeung AC; Fearon WF
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Sep; 82(3):E192-9. PubMed ID: 23412754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Discrepancy between frequency domain optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound in human coronary arteries and in a phantom in vitro coronary model.
    Kim IC; Nam CW; Cho YK; Park HS; Yoon HJ; Kim H; Chung IS; Han S; Hur SH; Kim YN; Kim KB
    Int J Cardiol; 2016 Oct; 221():860-6. PubMed ID: 27434362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quantitative multi-modality imaging analysis of a fully bioresorbable stent: a head-to-head comparison between QCA, IVUS and OCT.
    Gutiérrez-Chico JL; Serruys PW; Girasis C; Garg S; Onuma Y; Brugaletta S; García-García H; van Es GA; Regar E
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Mar; 28(3):467-78. PubMed ID: 21359517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison between optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound in detecting neointimal healing patterns after stent implantation.
    Kochman J; Pietrasik A; Rdzanak A; Jąkała J; Zasada W; Scibisz A; Kołtowski L; Proniewska K; Pociask E; Legutko J
    Kardiol Pol; 2014; 72(6):534-40. PubMed ID: 24293141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 30.