254 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25935155)
1. Spider surgical system versus multiport laparoscopic surgery: performance comparison on a surgical simulator.
Giannotti D; Casella G; Patrizi G; Di Rocco G; Castagneto-Gissey L; Metere A; Bernieri MG; Vestri AR; Redler A
BMC Surg; 2015 May; 15():54. PubMed ID: 25935155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS™) versus standard laparoscopic surgery: a comparison of performance using a surgical simulator.
Santos BF; Enter D; Soper NJ; Hungness ES
Surg Endosc; 2011 Feb; 25(2):483-90. PubMed ID: 20585958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Robotic Assistance Confers Ambidexterity to Laparoscopic Surgeons.
Choussein S; Srouji SS; Farland LV; Wietsma A; Missmer SA; Hollis M; Yu RN; Pozner CN; Gargiulo AR
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 25(1):76-83. PubMed ID: 28734971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Skills Comparison in Pediatric Residents Using a 2-Dimensional versus a 3-Dimensional High-Definition Camera in a Pediatric Laparoscopic Simulator.
Guanà R; Ferrero L; Garofalo S; Cerrina A; Cussa D; Arezzo A; Schleef J
J Surg Educ; 2017; 74(4):644-649. PubMed ID: 28039097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Task performance in standard laparoscopy in comparison with single-incision laparoscopy in a modified skills trainer.
Wright AS; Khandelwal S
Surg Endosc; 2016 Aug; 30(8):3591-7. PubMed ID: 26823059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Convergent validation and transfer of learning studies of a virtual reality-based pattern cutting simulator.
Nemani A; Ahn W; Cooper C; Schwaitzberg S; De S
Surg Endosc; 2018 Mar; 32(3):1265-1272. PubMed ID: 28812196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Training minimally invasive surgery's basic skills: is expensive always better?
Parente G; De Marziani L; Cordola C; Gargano T; Libri M; Lima M
Pediatr Surg Int; 2021 Sep; 37(9):1287-1293. PubMed ID: 34110478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Laparoscopic and robotic skills are transferable in a simulation setting: a randomized controlled trial.
Thomaier L; Orlando M; Abernethy M; Paka C; Chen CCG
Surg Endosc; 2017 Aug; 31(8):3279-3285. PubMed ID: 27924388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Skills in minimally invasive and open surgery show limited transferability to robotic surgery: results from a prospective study.
Kowalewski KF; Schmidt MW; Proctor T; Pohl M; Wennberg E; Karadza E; Romero P; Kenngott HG; Müller-Stich BP; Nickel F
Surg Endosc; 2018 Apr; 32(4):1656-1667. PubMed ID: 29435749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) surgery versus conventional laparoscopic surgery: comparison of surgical port performance in a surgical simulator with novices.
Brown-Clerk B; de Laveaga AE; LaGrange CA; Wirth LM; Lowndes BR; Hallbeck MS
Surg Endosc; 2011 Jul; 25(7):2210-8. PubMed ID: 21184104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Endosuture trainer box simulator as a tool for training and teaching in bariatric laparoscopic surgery.
de Moura Júnior LG; de Vasconcelos PRL; Fechine FV; de Moura MS; de Moura RLS; Rocha HAL; de Moraes Filho MO
BMC Surg; 2018 Oct; 18(1):83. PubMed ID: 30301475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Factors associated with simulator-assessed laparoscopic surgical skills of veterinary students.
Kilkenny JJ; Singh A; Kerr CL; Khosa DK; Fransson BA
J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2017 Jun; 250(11):1308-1315. PubMed ID: 28509639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ramifications of single-port laparoscopic surgery: measuring differences in task performance using simulation.
Conway NE; Romanelli JR; Bush RW; Seymour NE
Surg Innov; 2014 Feb; 21(1):106-11. PubMed ID: 23980199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Performance Gap for Residents in Transfer of Intracorporeal Suturing Skills From Box Trainer to Operating Room.
Crochet P; Agostini A; Knight S; Resseguier N; Berdah S; Aggarwal R
J Surg Educ; 2017; 74(6):1019-1027. PubMed ID: 28624174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validation of the VBLaST peg transfer task: a first step toward an alternate training standard.
Chellali A; Zhang L; Sankaranarayanan G; Arikatla VS; Ahn W; Derevianko A; Schwaitzberg SD; Jones DB; DeMoya M; Cao CG
Surg Endosc; 2014 Oct; 28(10):2856-62. PubMed ID: 24771197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Fundamentals of Vaginal Surgery pilot study: developing, validating, and setting proficiency scores for a vaginal surgical skills simulation system.
Schmidt PC; Fairchild PS; Fenner DE; Rooney DM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Nov; 225(5):558.e1-558.e11. PubMed ID: 34464583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validation of the VBLaST: A Virtual Peg Transfer Task in Gynecologic Surgeons.
Awtrey C; Chellali A; Schwaitzberg S; De S; Jones D; Cao C
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015; 22(7):1271-7. PubMed ID: 26216094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Development of a web-based laparoscopic technical skills assessment and testing instrument: a pilot study.
Rudderow J; Bansal J; Wearne S; Lara-Torre E; Paget C; Ferrara J
J Surg Educ; 2014; 71(6):e73-8. PubMed ID: 25127452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validation of the VBLaST pattern cutting task: a learning curve study.
Linsk AM; Monden KR; Sankaranarayanan G; Ahn W; Jones DB; De S; Schwaitzberg SD; Cao CGL
Surg Endosc; 2018 Apr; 32(4):1990-2002. PubMed ID: 29052071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A randomized controlled study to establish the effect of articulating instruments on performance in single-incision laparoscopic surgery.
Corker HP; Singh P; Sodergren MH; Balaji S; Kwasnicki RM; Darzi AW; Paraskeva P
J Surg Educ; 2015; 72(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 25218370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
