205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25935244)
1. Short communication: Reliability of single-step genomic BLUP breeding values by multi-trait test-day model analysis.
Bauer J; Přibyl J; Vostrý L
J Dairy Sci; 2015 Jul; 98(7):4999-5003. PubMed ID: 25935244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Autoregressive single-step test-day model for genomic evaluations of Portuguese Holstein cattle.
Silva AA; Silva DA; Silva FF; Costa CN; Lopes PS; Caetano AR; Thompson G; Carvalheira J
J Dairy Sci; 2019 Jul; 102(7):6330-6339. PubMed ID: 31056320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Contribution of domestic production records, Interbull estimated breeding values, and single nucleotide polymorphism genetic markers to the single-step genomic evaluation of milk production.
Přibyl J; Madsen P; Bauer J; Přibylová J; Simečková M; Vostrý L; Zavadilová L
J Dairy Sci; 2013 Mar; 96(3):1865-73. PubMed ID: 23312993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Genomic prediction of residual feed intake in US Holstein dairy cattle.
Li B; VanRaden PM; Guduk E; O'Connell JR; Null DJ; Connor EE; VandeHaar MJ; Tempelman RJ; Weigel KA; Cole JB
J Dairy Sci; 2020 Mar; 103(3):2477-2486. PubMed ID: 31954583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Breeding value reliabilities for multiple-trait single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor.
Ben Zaabza H; Taskinen M; Mäntysaari EA; Pitkänen T; Aamand GP; Strandén I
J Dairy Sci; 2022 Jun; 105(6):5221-5237. PubMed ID: 35400498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Application of single-step genomic evaluation using multiple-trait random regression test-day models in dairy cattle.
Oliveira HR; Lourenco DAL; Masuda Y; Misztal I; Tsuruta S; Jamrozik J; Brito LF; Silva FF; Schenkel FS
J Dairy Sci; 2019 Mar; 102(3):2365-2377. PubMed ID: 30638992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Domestic estimated breeding values and genomic enhanced breeding values of bulls in comparison with their foreign genomic enhanced breeding values.
Přibyl J; Bauer J; Čermák V; Pešek P; Přibylová J; Šplíchal J; Vostrá-Vydrová H; Vostrý L; Zavadilová L
Animal; 2015 Oct; 9(10):1635-42. PubMed ID: 26133272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Value of sharing cow reference population between countries on reliability of genomic prediction for milk yield traits.
Haile-Mariam M; MacLeod IM; Bolormaa S; Schrooten C; O'Connor E; de Jong G; Daetwyler HD; Pryce JE
J Dairy Sci; 2020 Feb; 103(2):1711-1728. PubMed ID: 31864746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Short communication: Single-step genomic evaluation of milk production traits using multiple-trait random regression model in Chinese Holsteins.
Kang H; Ning C; Zhou L; Zhang S; Yan Q; Liu JF
J Dairy Sci; 2018 Dec; 101(12):11143-11149. PubMed ID: 30268613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Including overseas performance information in genomic evaluations of Australian dairy cattle.
Haile-Mariam M; Pryce JE; Schrooten C; Hayes BJ
J Dairy Sci; 2015 May; 98(5):3443-59. PubMed ID: 25771052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Estimation of genetic parameters and breeding values for feed intake and energy balance using pedigree relationships or single-step genomic evaluation in Holstein Friesian cows.
Harder I; Stamer E; Junge W; Thaller G
J Dairy Sci; 2020 Mar; 103(3):2498-2513. PubMed ID: 31864743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of genomic predictions in Gyr (Bos indicus) dairy cattle.
Boison SA; Utsunomiya ATH; Santos DJA; Neves HHR; Carvalheiro R; Mészáros G; Utsunomiya YT; do Carmo AS; Verneque RS; Machado MA; Panetto JCC; Garcia JF; Sölkner J; da Silva MVGB
J Dairy Sci; 2017 Jul; 100(7):5479-5490. PubMed ID: 28527809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracies of breeding values for dry matter intake using nongenotyped animals and predictor traits in different lactations.
Manzanilla-Pech CIV; Veerkamp RF; de Haas Y; Calus MPL; Ten Napel J
J Dairy Sci; 2017 Nov; 100(11):9103-9114. PubMed ID: 28865857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of genomic predictions for lowly heritable traits using multi-step and single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor in Holstein cattle.
Guarini AR; Lourenco DAL; Brito LF; Sargolzaei M; Baes CF; Miglior F; Misztal I; Schenkel FS
J Dairy Sci; 2018 Sep; 101(9):8076-8086. PubMed ID: 29935829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The marker effects of a single-step random regression model for 4 test-day traits in German Holsteins.
Alkhoder H; Liu Z; Reents R
J Dairy Sci; 2024 Jan; 107(1):423-437. PubMed ID: 37709030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Genomic prediction for Nordic Red Cattle using one-step and selection index blending.
Su G; Madsen P; Nielsen US; Mäntysaari EA; Aamand GP; Christensen OF; Lund MS
J Dairy Sci; 2012 Feb; 95(2):909-17. PubMed ID: 22281355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Application of multivariate single-step SNP best linear unbiased predictor model and revised SNP list for genomic evaluation of dairy cattle in Australia.
Konstantinov KV; Goddard ME
J Dairy Sci; 2020 Sep; 103(9):8305-8316. PubMed ID: 32622609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Differing genetic trend estimates from traditional and genomic evaluations of genotyped animals as evidence of preselection bias in US Holsteins.
Masuda Y; VanRaden PM; Misztal I; Lawlor TJ
J Dairy Sci; 2018 Jun; 101(6):5194-5206. PubMed ID: 29573806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Including different groups of genotyped females for genomic prediction in a Nordic Jersey population.
Gao H; Madsen P; Nielsen US; Aamand GP; Su G; Byskov K; Jensen J
J Dairy Sci; 2015 Dec; 98(12):9051-9. PubMed ID: 26433419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Genomic prediction of lactation curves for milk, fat, protein, and somatic cell score in Holstein cattle.
Oliveira HR; Brito LF; Silva FF; Lourenco DAL; Jamrozik J; Schenkel FS
J Dairy Sci; 2019 Jan; 102(1):452-463. PubMed ID: 30391177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
