197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25935427)
1. Effectiveness of low speed autonomous emergency braking in real-world rear-end crashes.
Fildes B; Keall M; Bos N; Lie A; Page Y; Pastor C; Pennisi L; Rizzi M; Thomas P; Tingvall C
Accid Anal Prev; 2015 Aug; 81():24-9. PubMed ID: 25935427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effectiveness of forward collision warning and autonomous emergency braking systems in reducing front-to-rear crash rates.
Cicchino JB
Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Feb; 99(Pt A):142-152. PubMed ID: 27898367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Characteristics of rear-end crashes involving passenger vehicles with automatic emergency braking.
Cicchino JB; Zuby DS
Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup1):S112-S118. PubMed ID: 31381436
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Effectiveness of front crash prevention systems in reducing large truck real-world crash rates.
Teoh ER
Traffic Inj Prev; 2021; 22(4):284-289. PubMed ID: 33769151
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of forward collision warning and automatic emergency braking on rear-end crashes involving pickup trucks.
Cicchino JB
Traffic Inj Prev; 2023; 24(4):293-298. PubMed ID: 36853168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of the crash mitigation effect of low-speed automated emergency braking systems based on insurance claims data.
Isaksson-Hellman I; Lindman M
Traffic Inj Prev; 2016 Sep; 17 Suppl 1():42-7. PubMed ID: 27586101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Forward collision warning system impact.
Hubele N; Kennedy K
Traffic Inj Prev; 2018; 19(sup2):S78-S83. PubMed ID: 30001148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effectiveness of lane departure warning systems-A reduction in real-world passenger car injury crashes.
Sternlund S; Strandroth J; Rizzi M; Lie A; Tingvall C
Traffic Inj Prev; 2017 Feb; 18(2):225-229. PubMed ID: 27624313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Estimated benefit of automated emergency braking systems for vehicle-pedestrian crashes in the United States.
Haus SH; Sherony R; Gabler HC
Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup1):S171-S176. PubMed ID: 31381447
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of Expected Crash and Injury Reduction from Production Forward Collision and Lane Departure Warning Systems.
Kusano KD; Gabler HC
Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 2():S109-14. PubMed ID: 26436219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects on crash risk of automatic emergency braking systems for pedestrians and bicyclists.
Kullgren A; Amin K; Tingvall C
Traffic Inj Prev; 2023; 24(sup1):S111-S115. PubMed ID: 37267014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluating automated emergency braking performance in simulated car-to-two-wheeler crashes in China: A comparison between C-NCAP tests and in-depth crash data.
Sui B; Lubbe N; Bärgman J
Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Sep; 159():106229. PubMed ID: 34225169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Autonomous emergency braking systems adapted to snowy road conditions improve drivers' perceived safety and trust.
Koglbauer I; Holzinger J; Eichberger A; Lex C
Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Apr; 19(3):332-337. PubMed ID: 29227692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Improving the safety relevance of automatic emergency braking testing programs: An examination of common characteristics of police-reported rear-end crashes in the United States.
Kidd DG
Traffic Inj Prev; 2022; 23(sup1):S137-S142. PubMed ID: 35767826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Are front crash prevention systems less effective at preventing rear-end crashes where trucks and motorcycles are struck?
Cicchino JB; Kidd DG
Traffic Inj Prev; 2024; 25(3):440-444. PubMed ID: 38466620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Characteristics of automatic emergency braking responses in passenger vehicles evaluated in the IIHS front crash prevention program.
Kidd DG; Perez-Rapela D; Jermakian JS
Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Sep; 190():107150. PubMed ID: 37301163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Market penetration of intersection AEB: Characterizing avoided and residual straight crossing path accidents.
Sander U; Lubbe N
Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Jun; 115():178-188. PubMed ID: 29604516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Estimate of potential benefit for Europe of fitting Autonomous Emergency Braking (AEB) systems for pedestrian protection to passenger cars.
Edwards M; Nathanson A; Wisch M
Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15 Suppl 1():S173-82. PubMed ID: 25307384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intersection AEB implementation strategies for left turn across path crashes.
Sander U; Lubbe N; Pietzsch S
Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup1):S119-S125. PubMed ID: 31381448
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessment of Integrated Pedestrian Protection Systems with Autonomous Emergency Braking (AEB) and Passive Safety Components.
Edwards M; Nathanson A; Carroll J; Wisch M; Zander O; Lubbe N
Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 1():S2-S11. PubMed ID: 26027971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
