368 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25936452)
1. Effect of a stylet on a histological specimen in EUS-guided fine-needle tissue acquisition by using 22-gauge needles: a multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled trial.
Abe Y; Kawakami H; Oba K; Hayashi T; Yasuda I; Mukai T; Isayama H; Ishiwatari H; Doi S; Nakashima M; Yamamoto N; Kuwatani M; Mitsuhashi T; Hasegawa T; Hirose Y; Yamada T; Tanaka M; Sakamoto N;
Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Nov; 82(5):837-844.e1. PubMed ID: 25936452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnostic yield of malignancy during EUS-guided FNA of solid lesions with and without a stylet: a prospective, single blind, randomized, controlled trial.
Wani S; Early D; Kunkel J; Leathersich A; Hovis CE; Hollander TG; Kohlmeier C; Zelenka C; Azar R; Edmundowicz S; Collins B; Liu J; Hall M; Mullady D
Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Aug; 76(2):328-35. PubMed ID: 22695205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. High and low negative pressure suction techniques in EUS-guided fine-needle tissue acquisition by using 25-gauge needles: a multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled trial.
Kudo T; Kawakami H; Hayashi T; Yasuda I; Mukai T; Inoue H; Katanuma A; Kawakubo K; Ishiwatari H; Doi S; Yamada R; Maguchi H; Isayama H; Mitsuhashi T; Sakamoto N;
Gastrointest Endosc; 2014 Dec; 80(6):1030-7.e1. PubMed ID: 24890422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: 22-gauge aspiration versus 25-gauge biopsy needles.
Yang MJ; Yim H; Hwang JC; Lee D; Kim YB; Lim SG; Kim SS; Kang JK; Yoo BM; Kim JH
BMC Gastroenterol; 2015 Sep; 15():122. PubMed ID: 26419845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prospective evaluation of the optimal number of 25-gauge needle passes for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy of solid pancreatic lesions in the absence of an onsite cytopathologist.
Suzuki R; Irisawa A; Bhutani MS; Hikichi T; Takagi T; Sato A; Sato M; Ikeda T; Watanabe K; Nakamura J; Tasaki K; Obara K; Ohira H
Dig Endosc; 2012 Nov; 24(6):452-6. PubMed ID: 23078439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. High single-pass diagnostic yield of a new 25-gauge core biopsy needle for EUS-guided FNA biopsy in solid pancreatic lesions.
Iwashita T; Nakai Y; Samarasena JB; Park DH; Zhang Z; Gu M; Lee JG; Chang KJ
Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Jun; 77(6):909-15. PubMed ID: 23433596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic ability of EUS-FNA for pancreatic solid lesions with conventional 22-gauge needle using the slow pull technique: a prospective study.
Kin T; Katanuma A; Yane K; Takahashi K; Osanai M; Takaki R; Matsumoto K; Gon K; Matsumori T; Tomonari A; Maguchi H; Shinohara T; Nojima M
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2015 Jul; 50(7):900-7. PubMed ID: 25732902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing the performance of 22 gauge versus 25 gauge EUS-FNA needles in solid masses.
Vilmann P; Săftoiu A; Hollerbach S; Skov BG; Linnemann D; Popescu CF; Wellmann A; Gorunescu F; Clementsen P; Freund U; Flemming P; Hassan H; Gheonea DI; Streba L; Ioncică AM; Streba CT
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2013 Jul; 48(7):877-83. PubMed ID: 23795663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of 22-gauge standard fine needle versus core biopsy needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of suspected pancreatic cancer: a randomized crossover trial.
Noh DH; Choi K; Gu S; Cho J; Jang KT; Woo YS; Lee KT; Lee JK; Lee KH
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2018 Jan; 53(1):94-99. PubMed ID: 29065734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A prospective, single-blind, randomized, controlled trial of EUS-guided FNA with and without a stylet.
Rastogi A; Wani S; Gupta N; Singh V; Gaddam S; Reddymasu S; Ulusarac O; Fan F; Romanas M; Dennis KL; Sharma P; Bansal A; Oropeza-Vail M; Olyaee M
Gastrointest Endosc; 2011 Jul; 74(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 21514932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The 25-gauge EUS-FNA needle: Good for on-site but poor for off-site evaluation? Results of a randomized trial.
Varadarajulu S; Bang JY; Holt BA; Hasan MK; Logue A; Hawes RH; Hebert-Magee S
Gastrointest Endosc; 2014 Dec; 80(6):1056-63. PubMed ID: 24973173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of the Diagnostic Performance of Newly Designed 21-Gauge and Standard 22-Gauge Aspiration Needles in Patients with Solid Pancreatic Masses.
Minaga K; Yoshikawa T; Yamashita Y; Akamatsu H; Ikenouchi M; Ishii T; Matsumoto H; Iwagami H; Nakatani Y; Hatamaru K; Takenaka M; Akamatsu T; Uenoyama Y; Watanabe T; Ono K; Chiba Y; Kudo M
Dig Dis Sci; 2019 Oct; 64(10):2982-2991. PubMed ID: 31011943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of 22G standard and Franseen needles in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for diagnosing pancreatic mass lesions: Study protocol for a controlled trial.
Itonaga M; Yasukawa S; Shimokawa T; Takenaka M; Fukutake N; Ogura T; Sakagami J; Shiomi H; Okura Y; Inatomi O; Matsumoto H; Kurita A; Suzuki A; Tanaka K; Kitano M
Trials; 2019 Dec; 20(1):816. PubMed ID: 31888733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Randomized controlled trial comparing stylet-free endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration with 22-G and 25-G needles.
Gimeno-García AZ; Elwassief A; Paquin SC; Gariépy G; Sahai AV
Dig Endosc; 2014 May; 26(3):467-73. PubMed ID: 24877242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Factors affecting the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for upper gastrointestinal submucosal or extraluminal solid mass lesions.
Rong L; Kida M; Yamauchi H; Okuwaki K; Miyazawa S; Iwai T; Kikuchi H; Watanabe M; Imaizumi H; Koizumi W
Dig Endosc; 2012 Sep; 24(5):358-63. PubMed ID: 22925290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The usefulness of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for the diagnosis of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors based on the World Health Organization classification.
Unno J; Kanno A; Masamune A; Kasajima A; Fujishima F; Ishida K; Hamada S; Kume K; Kikuta K; Hirota M; Motoi F; Unno M; Shimosegawa T
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2014 Nov; 49(11):1367-74. PubMed ID: 25180490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Core biopsy needle versus standard aspiration needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a randomized parallel-group study.
Lee YN; Moon JH; Kim HK; Choi HJ; Choi MH; Kim DC; Lee TH; Cha SW; Cho YD; Park SH
Endoscopy; 2014 Dec; 46(12):1056-62. PubMed ID: 25098611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. "Wet suction technique (WEST)": a novel way to enhance the quality of EUS-FNA aspirate. Results of a prospective, single-blind, randomized, controlled trial using a 22-gauge needle for EUS-FNA of solid lesions.
Attam R; Arain MA; Bloechl SJ; Trikudanathan G; Munigala S; Bakman Y; Singh M; Wallace T; Henderson JB; Catalano MF; Guda NM
Gastrointest Endosc; 2015; 81(6):1401-7. PubMed ID: 25733127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A 19-Gauge Histology Needle Versus a 19-Gauge Standard Needle in Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration for Solid Lesions: A Multicenter Randomized Comparison Study (GREATER Study).
Iwashita T; Nakai Y; Mukai T; Togawa O; Matsubara S; Hatano Y; Hara A; Tanaka M; Shibahara J; Fukayama M; Isayama H; Yasuda I
Dig Dis Sci; 2018 Apr; 63(4):1043-1051. PubMed ID: 29464585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Multicenter, prospective, crossover trial comparing the door-knocking method with the conventional method for EUS-FNA of solid pancreatic masses (with videos).
Mukai S; Itoi T; Ashida R; Tsuchiya T; Ikeuchi N; Kamada K; Tanaka R; Umeda J; Tonozuka R; Fukutake N; Hoshi K; Moriyasu F; Gotoda T; Irisawa A
Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Jun; 83(6):1210-7. PubMed ID: 26522372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
