BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

339 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25937375)

  • 1. Perception of shape and space across rigid transformations.
    Schmidt F; Spröte P; Fleming RW
    Vision Res; 2016 Sep; 126():318-329. PubMed ID: 25937375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bent out of shape: The visual inference of non-rigid shape transformations applied to objects.
    Spröte P; Fleming RW
    Vision Res; 2016 Sep; 126():330-346. PubMed ID: 26386343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Visual perception of complex shape-transforming processes.
    Schmidt F; Fleming RW
    Cogn Psychol; 2016 Nov; 90():48-70. PubMed ID: 27631704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Identifying shape transformations from photographs of real objects.
    Schmidt F; Fleming RW
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0202115. PubMed ID: 30114202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Decomposing the spatiotemporal signature in dynamic 3D object recognition.
    Wang Y; Zhang K
    J Vis; 2010 Aug; 10(10):23. PubMed ID: 20884488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Visual perception of shape-transforming processes: 'Shape Scission'.
    Schmidt F; Phillips F; Fleming RW
    Cognition; 2019 Aug; 189():167-180. PubMed ID: 30986590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. EEG μ rhythm in virtual reality reveals that motor coding of visual objects in peripersonal space is task dependent.
    Wamain Y; Gabrielli F; Coello Y
    Cortex; 2016 Jan; 74():20-30. PubMed ID: 26606301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Space constancy vs. shape constancy.
    Jaekl PM; Harris LR
    Seeing Perceiving; 2010; 23(5-6):385-99. PubMed ID: 21466133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Exploiting object constancy: effects of active exploration and shape morphing on similarity judgments of novel objects.
    Lee H; Wallraven C
    Exp Brain Res; 2013 Mar; 225(2):277-89. PubMed ID: 23263625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The perception of 3D shape from planar cut contours.
    Egan EJ; Todd JT; Phillips F
    J Vis; 2011 Oct; 11(12):1-13. PubMed ID: 22016555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Spatial choices of macaque monkeys based on the visual representation of the response space: rotation of the stimuli.
    Nedvidek J; Nekovarova T; Bures J
    Behav Brain Res; 2008 Nov; 193(2):204-8. PubMed ID: 18588916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mental transformations of spatial stimuli in humans and in monkeys: rotation vs. translocation.
    Nekovarova T; Nedvidek J; Klement D; Rokyta R; Bures J
    Behav Brain Res; 2013 Mar; 240():182-91. PubMed ID: 23174207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Integrated contextual representation for objects' identities and their locations.
    Gronau N; Neta M; Bar M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Mar; 20(3):371-88. PubMed ID: 18004950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Unraveling mechanisms for expert object recognition: bridging brain activity and behavior.
    Gauthier I; Tarr MJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2002 Apr; 28(2):431-46. PubMed ID: 11999864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Early development of dynamic shape perception under slit-viewing conditions.
    Imura T; Shirai N
    Perception; 2014; 43(7):654-62. PubMed ID: 25223109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Exogenous object-centered attention.
    Theeuwes J; Mathôt S; Grainger J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Jul; 75(5):812-8. PubMed ID: 23636948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Do silhouettes and photographs produce fundamentally different object-based correspondence effects?
    Proctor RW; Lien MC; Thompson L
    Cognition; 2017 Dec; 169():91-101. PubMed ID: 28865287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. When Geometry Constrains Vision: Systematic Misperceptions within Geometrical Configurations.
    Stucchi N; Scocchia L; Carlini A
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0151488. PubMed ID: 26986214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Object-based neglect varies with egocentric position.
    Karnath HO; Mandler A; Clavagnier S
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Oct; 23(10):2983-93. PubMed ID: 21391769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Concavities, negative parts, and the perception that shapes are complete.
    Spröte P; Fleming RW
    J Vis; 2013 Dec; 13(14):. PubMed ID: 24306852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.