617 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25937378)
1. Compressing with dominant hand improves quality of manual chest compressions for rescuers who performed suboptimal CPR in manikins.
Wang J; Tang C; Zhang L; Gong Y; Yin C; Li Y
Am J Emerg Med; 2015 Jul; 33(7):931-6. PubMed ID: 25937378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Role of dominant versus non-dominant hand position during uninterrupted chest compression CPR by novice rescuers: a randomized double-blind crossover study.
Nikandish R; Shahbazi S; Golabi S; Beygi N
Resuscitation; 2008 Feb; 76(2):256-60. PubMed ID: 17822829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A 10-s rest improves chest compression quality during hands-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a prospective, randomized crossover study using a manikin model.
Min MK; Yeom SR; Ryu JH; Kim YI; Park MR; Han SK; Lee SH; Cho SJ
Resuscitation; 2013 Sep; 84(9):1279-84. PubMed ID: 23402967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dominant hand position improves the quality of external chest compression: a manikin study based on 2010 CPR guidelines.
Jiang C; Jiang S; Zhao Y; Xu B; Zhou XL
J Emerg Med; 2015 Apr; 48(4):436-44. PubMed ID: 25648053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Relative effectiveness of dominant versus non-dominant hand position for rescuer's side of approach during chest compressions between right-handed and left-handed novice rescuers.
You JS; Kim H; Park JS; Baek KM; Jang MS; Lee HS; Chung SP; Kim S
Emerg Med J; 2015 Mar; 32(3):184-8. PubMed ID: 24127107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Incomplete chest wall decompression: a clinical evaluation of CPR performance by trained laypersons and an assessment of alternative manual chest compression-decompression techniques.
Aufderheide TP; Pirrallo RG; Yannopoulos D; Klein JP; von Briesen C; Sparks CW; Deja KA; Kitscha DJ; Provo TA; Lurie KG
Resuscitation; 2006 Dec; 71(3):341-51. PubMed ID: 17070644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Up-down hand position switch may delay the fatigue of non-dominant hand position rescuers and improve chest compression quality during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a randomized crossover manikin study.
Zhou XL; Li L; Jiang C; Xu B; Wang HL; Xiong D; Sheng LP; Yang QS; Jiang S; Xu P; Chen ZQ; Zhao Y
PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0133483. PubMed ID: 26267353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Incomplete chest wall decompression: a clinical evaluation of CPR performance by EMS personnel and assessment of alternative manual chest compression-decompression techniques.
Aufderheide TP; Pirrallo RG; Yannopoulos D; Klein JP; von Briesen C; Sparks CW; Deja KA; Conrad CJ; Kitscha DJ; Provo TA; Lurie KG
Resuscitation; 2005 Mar; 64(3):353-62. PubMed ID: 15733766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Manual versus Mechanical Chest Compressions on Surfaces of Varying Softness with or without Backboards: A Randomized, Crossover Manikin Study.
Putzer G; Fiala A; Braun P; Neururer S; Biechl K; Keilig B; Ploner W; Fop E; Paal P
J Emerg Med; 2016 Apr; 50(4):594-600.e1. PubMed ID: 26607696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Rescuer fatigue: standard versus continuous chest-compression cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
Heidenreich JW; Berg RA; Higdon TA; Ewy GA; Kern KB; Sanders AB
Acad Emerg Med; 2006 Oct; 13(10):1020-6. PubMed ID: 17015418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Short structured feedback training is equivalent to a mechanical feedback device in two-rescuer BLS: a randomised simulation study.
Pavo N; Goliasch G; Nierscher FJ; Stumpf D; Haugk M; Breckwoldt J; Ruetzler K; Greif R; Fischer H
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med; 2016 May; 24():70. PubMed ID: 27177424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quality of chest compressions during 10min of single-rescuer basic life support with different compression: ventilation ratios in a manikin model.
Bjørshol CA; Søreide E; Torsteinbø TH; Lexow K; Nilsen OB; Sunde K
Resuscitation; 2008 Apr; 77(1):95-100. PubMed ID: 18207627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effectiveness of simplified chest compression-only CPR training for the general public: a randomized controlled trial.
Nishiyama C; Iwami T; Kawamura T; Ando M; Yonemoto N; Hiraide A; Nonogi H
Resuscitation; 2008 Oct; 79(1):90-6. PubMed ID: 18656300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparing three CPR feedback devices and standard BLS in a single rescuer scenario: a randomised simulation study.
Zapletal B; Greif R; Stumpf D; Nierscher FJ; Frantal S; Haugk M; Ruetzler K; Schlimp C; Fischer H
Resuscitation; 2014 Apr; 85(4):560-6. PubMed ID: 24215730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of chest compression rate guidance on the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation performed on manikins.
Jäntti H; Silfvast T; Turpeinen A; Kiviniemi V; Uusaro A
Resuscitation; 2009 Apr; 80(4):453-7. PubMed ID: 19203821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quality of lay person CPR performance with compression: ventilation ratios 15:2, 30:2 or continuous chest compressions without ventilations on manikins.
Odegaard S; Saether E; Steen PA; Wik L
Resuscitation; 2006 Dec; 71(3):335-40. PubMed ID: 17069958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Use of step stool during resuscitation improved the quality of chest compression in simulated resuscitation.
Lee DH; Kim CW; Kim SE; Lee SJ
Emerg Med Australas; 2012 Aug; 24(4):369-73. PubMed ID: 22862753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Individualized rescuer change by a team leader during uninterrupted cardiopulmonary resuscitation: comparison with rescuer change in 2-min intervals.
Shin DH; Cho JH; Park SO
Eur J Emerg Med; 2016 Aug; 23(4):263-268. PubMed ID: 25738793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. LUCAS compared to manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation is more effective during helicopter rescue-a prospective, randomized, cross-over manikin study.
Putzer G; Braun P; Zimmermann A; Pedross F; Strapazzon G; Brugger H; Paal P
Am J Emerg Med; 2013 Feb; 31(2):384-9. PubMed ID: 23000324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. CPR PRO® device reduces rescuer fatigue during continuous chest compression cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a randomized crossover trial using a manikin model.
Kovic I; Lulic D; Lulic I
J Emerg Med; 2013 Oct; 45(4):570-7. PubMed ID: 23845522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
