These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25938108)

  • 21. Reciprocal peer teaching: students teaching students in the gross anatomy laboratory.
    Krych AJ; March CN; Bryan RE; Peake BJ; Pawlina W; Carmichael SW
    Clin Anat; 2005 May; 18(4):296-301. PubMed ID: 15832347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Why dissection videos should not replace cadaver prosections in the gross veterinary anatomy curriculum: results from a comparative study.
    Theoret CL; Carmel EN; Bernier S
    J Vet Med Educ; 2007; 34(2):151-6. PubMed ID: 17446641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Undergraduate dental students' perceptions of head and neck anatomy teaching in Australia.
    Hassan NM; Akhter R; Al-Aubaidy H; Flatau A
    Eur J Dent Educ; 2018 Aug; 22(3):e337-e342. PubMed ID: 29091339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A large-scale peer teaching programme - acceptance and benefit.
    Schuetz E; Obirei B; Salat D; Scholz J; Hann D; Dethleffsen K
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2017 Aug; 125():71-79. PubMed ID: 28599822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Interactive Lecture in the Dissection Hall: Transforming Passive Lecture into a Dynamic Learning Experience.
    Chimmalgi M
    Anat Sci Educ; 2019 Mar; 12(2):191-199. PubMed ID: 30118568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Evaluation of a gross anatomy program without dissection.
    Jones NA; Olafson RP; Sutin J
    J Med Educ; 1978 Mar; 53(3):198-205. PubMed ID: 344885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Outcomes of a rotational dissection system in gross anatomy.
    Marshak DW; Oakes J; Hsieh PH; Chuang AZ; Cleary LJ
    Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(5):438-44. PubMed ID: 25358463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Human anatomy: let the students tell us how to teach.
    Davis CR; Bates AS; Ellis H; Roberts AM
    Anat Sci Educ; 2014; 7(4):262-72. PubMed ID: 24249485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Human clay models versus cat dissection: how the similarity between the classroom and the exam affects student performance.
    Waters JR; Van Meter P; Perrotti W; Drogo S; Cyr RJ
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2011 Jun; 35(2):227-36. PubMed ID: 21652509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Benefits of extracurricular participation in dissection in a prosection-based medical anatomy program.
    Whelan A; Leddy JJ; Ramnanan CJ
    Anat Sci Educ; 2018 May; 11(3):294-302. PubMed ID: 28881412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The impact of alternating dissection on student performance in a medical anatomy course: are dissection videos an effective substitute for actual dissection?
    Granger NA; Calleson D
    Clin Anat; 2007 Apr; 20(3):315-21. PubMed ID: 16795027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Improving Online Interactions: Lessons from an Online Anatomy Course with a Laboratory for Undergraduate Students.
    Attardi SM; Barbeau ML; Rogers KA
    Anat Sci Educ; 2018 Nov; 11(6):592-604. PubMed ID: 29493909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Do we need dissection in an integrated problem-based learning medical course? Perceptions of first- and second-year students.
    Azer SA; Eizenberg N
    Surg Radiol Anat; 2007 Mar; 29(2):173-80. PubMed ID: 17318286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Near-peer driven dissection selective: A primer to the medical school anatomy course.
    Cantwell S; Bonadurer GF; Pawlina W; Lachman N
    Clin Anat; 2015 Nov; 28(8):985-93. PubMed ID: 26375596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Student performance in and perceptions of a high structure undergraduate human anatomy course.
    Shaffer JF
    Anat Sci Educ; 2016 Nov; 9(6):516-528. PubMed ID: 26990231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Dissection and dissection-associated required experiences improve student performance in gross anatomy: Differences among quartiles.
    Pizzimenti MA; Pantazis N; Sandra A; Hoffmann DS; Lenoch S; Ferguson KJ
    Anat Sci Educ; 2016 May; 9(3):238-46. PubMed ID: 26536279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Training peer instructors for a combined ultrasound/physical exam curriculum.
    Ahn JS; French AJ; Thiessen ME; Kendall JL
    Teach Learn Med; 2014; 26(3):292-5. PubMed ID: 25010242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Medical student preferences for self-directed study resources in gross anatomy.
    Choi-Lundberg DL; Low TF; Patman P; Turner P; Sinha SN
    Anat Sci Educ; 2016; 9(2):150-60. PubMed ID: 26033851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Team-based learning in the gross anatomy laboratory improves academic performance and students' attitudes toward teamwork.
    Huitt TW; Killins A; Brooks WS
    Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(2):95-103. PubMed ID: 24799448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effect of Curriculum Changes on Student Performance During General Surgical Clerkship.
    Hagan EA; Jaffe BM
    J Surg Educ; 2018; 75(3):622-627. PubMed ID: 28928031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.