These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
42. Selection of optimal expansion angle and length of an expandable implant in the osteoporotic mandible: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Xiao JR; Kong L; Chen YX; Han XX; Li YF Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(2):e88-97. PubMed ID: 23527373 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Number and localization of the implants for the fixed prosthetic reconstructions: on the strain in the anterior maxillary region. Bölükbaşı N; Yeniyol S Med Eng Phys; 2015 Apr; 37(4):431-45. PubMed ID: 25765190 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Influence of platform and abutment angulation on peri-implant bone. A three-dimensional finite element stress analysis. Martini AP; Barros RM; Júnior AC; Rocha EP; de Almeida EO; Ferraz CC; Pellegrin MC; Anchieta RB J Oral Implantol; 2013 Dec; 39(6):663-9. PubMed ID: 23110305 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. The Use of a New Safe Angle Concept for Immediate Implant Placement in the Anterior Maxilla: A Cross-Sectional CBCT Study. Fettouh AIA; Keraa KM; Mina NA; Abdelmalak MS; Abdelrahman AAG; Shemais NM Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2024 Jun; (3):77-86. PubMed ID: 38607356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Anterior Single Implant-Supported Prostheses with Different Bone Anchorages. Verri FR; Santiago Júnior JF; Almeida DA; Verri AC; Batista VE; Lemos CA; Noritomi PY; Pellizzer EP ScientificWorldJournal; 2015; 2015():321528. PubMed ID: 26351654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Influence of implant abutment type on stress distribution in bone under various loading conditions using finite element analysis. Chun HJ; Shin HS; Han CH; Lee SH Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(2):195-202. PubMed ID: 16634489 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Evaluation of Stress Generated with Different Abutment Materials and Angulations under Axial and Oblique Loading in the Anterior Maxilla: Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis. Kapoor S; Rodrigues S; Mahesh M; Shetty T; Pai U; Saldanha S; Hedge P; Shenoy S Int J Dent; 2021; 2021():9205930. PubMed ID: 34899916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. [Comparative analysis of different types of implant-abutment interface on the basis of three-dimensional finite element analysis data]. Muraev AA; Ivanov SY; Leonov SV; Mrue AH; Muhametshin RF; Gazhva YV Stomatologiia (Mosk); 2019; 98(1):11-16. PubMed ID: 30830086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Correlation between abutment angulation and off-axial stresses on biomechanical behavior of titanium and zirconium implants in the anterior maxilla: A three-dimensional finite element analysis study. Guguloth H; Duggineni CR; Chitturi RK; Sujesh M; Ravvali T; Amiti RR J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2019; 19(4):353-361. PubMed ID: 31649445 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Biomechanical behaviour of tilted abutment after fixed partial denture restoration of CAD/CAM materials. Zhu T; Chen J; Xu Y; Zhu Z; Wang J; Pei X; Qiao M; Cheng B; Li R; Wan Q BMC Oral Health; 2024 Sep; 24(1):1128. PubMed ID: 39334128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Optimization of the Conical Angle Design in Conical Implant-Abutment Connections: A Pilot Study Based on the Finite Element Method. Yao KT; Chen CS; Cheng CK; Fang HW; Huang CH; Kao HC; Hsu ML J Oral Implantol; 2018 Feb; 44(1):26-35. PubMed ID: 29090979 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Biomechanical effect of a zirconia dental implant-crown system: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Chang CL; Chen CS; Yeung TC; Hsu ML Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(4):e49-57. PubMed ID: 22848900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. [Three dimensional finite element analysis of biomechanical distribution of dental implants with immediate loading]. Han XL; Liu ZW; Li YT Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Apr; 29(2):121-4. PubMed ID: 21598477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Effects of Cantilever Length and Implant Inclination on the Stress Distribution of Mandibular Prosthetic Restorations Constructed from Monolithic Zirconia Ceramic. Durkan R; Oyar P; Deste G Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2020; 35(1):121-129. PubMed ID: 31923295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Short implant to support maxillary restorations: bone stress analysis using regular and switching platform. de Carvalho NA; de Almeida EO; Rocha EP; Freitas AC; Anchieta RB; Kina S J Craniofac Surg; 2012 May; 23(3):678-81. PubMed ID: 22565882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Influence of Framework Material and Abutment Configuration on Fatigue Performance in Dental Implant Systems: A Finite Element Analysis. Erdoğdu M; Demirel MG; Mohammadi R; Güntekin N; Ghanbarzadeh Chaleshtori M Medicina (Kaunas); 2024 Sep; 60(9):. PubMed ID: 39336504 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Comparison of strain generated in bone by "platform-switched" and "non-platform-switched" implants with straight and angulated abutments under vertical and angulated load: a finite element analysis study. Paul S; Padmanabhan TV; Swarup S Indian J Dent Res; 2013; 24(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 23852226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Influence of bone morphology on the mechanobiological stimuli distribution of maxillary anterior labial bone: A biomechanical study. Liao M; Wang C; Wang C; Xu Y J Esthet Restor Dent; 2022 Oct; 34(7):1085-1095. PubMed ID: 35674468 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. [Three-dimensional finite element analysis of implant restoration in aesthetic zone of resin-ceramic composite single crown]. Hong YR; Li Y; Luo WY; Xiao LJ; Gao YB Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2020 Jun; 29(3):262-266. PubMed ID: 33043342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]