205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25938145)
1. [The finite element analysis of stress distribution in different size of MO cavities restored with composite resin inlays].
Zhang L; Lu Y; Yang BS; Guo Y; Li FP
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2015 Apr; 24(2):170-6. PubMed ID: 25938145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Stress distribution in molars restored with inlays or onlays with or without endodontic treatment: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Jiang W; Bo H; Yongchun G; LongXing N
J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Jan; 103(1):6-12. PubMed ID: 20105674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of stresses in molar teeth restored with inlays and direct restorations, including polymerization shrinkage of composite resin and tooth loading during mastication.
Dejak B; Młotkowski A
Dent Mater; 2015 Mar; 31(3):e77-87. PubMed ID: 25544104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Stress distributions in adhesively cemented ceramic and resin-composite Class II inlay restorations: a 3D-FEA study.
Ausiello P; Rengo S; Davidson CL; Watts DC
Dent Mater; 2004 Nov; 20(9):862-72. PubMed ID: 15451242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars.
Dejak B; Mlotkowski A
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 18262014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of stress distribution in inlay-restored mandibular first molar under simultaneous thermomechanical loads.
Çelik Köycü B; Imirzalioğlu P; Özden UA
Dent Mater J; 2016; 35(2):180-6. PubMed ID: 27041006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of ceramic thickness and composite bases on stress distribution of inlays--a finite element analysis.
Durand LB; Guimarães JC; Monteiro Junior S; Baratieri LN
Braz Dent J; 2015; 26(2):146-51. PubMed ID: 25831105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of mvM stress of inlays, onlays and endocrowns made from various materials and their bonding with molars in a computer simulation of mastication - FEA.
Dejak B; Młotkowski A
Dent Mater; 2020 Jul; 36(7):854-864. PubMed ID: 32473834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Porcelain versus composite inlays/onlays: effects of mechanical loads on stress distribution, adhesion, and crown flexure.
Magne P; Belser UC
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2003 Dec; 23(6):543-55. PubMed ID: 14703758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mechanical behavior of bulk direct composite versus block composite and lithium disilicate indirect Class II restorations by CAD-FEM modeling.
Ausiello P; Ciaramella S; Fabianelli A; Gloria A; Martorelli M; Lanzotti A; Watts DC
Dent Mater; 2017 Jun; 33(6):690-701. PubMed ID: 28413061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Investigating inlay designs of class II cavity with deep margin elevation using finite element method.
Chen YC; Lin CL; Hou CH
BMC Oral Health; 2021 May; 21(1):264. PubMed ID: 33993877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Virtual prototyping of adhesively restored, endodontically treated molars.
Magne P
J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Jun; 103(6):343-51. PubMed ID: 20493323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Efficient 3D finite element analysis of dental restorative procedures using micro-CT data.
Magne P
Dent Mater; 2007 May; 23(5):539-48. PubMed ID: 16730058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of different ceramic and composite materials on stress distribution in inlay and onlay cavities: 3-D finite element analysis.
Yamanel K; Caglar A; Gülsahi K; Ozden UA
Dent Mater J; 2009 Nov; 28(6):661-70. PubMed ID: 20019416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Finite element analysis of thermal stress distribution in different restorative materials used in class V cavities.
Guler MS; Guler C; Cakici F; Cakici EB; Sen S
Niger J Clin Pract; 2016; 19(1):30-4. PubMed ID: 26755215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Low and high viscosity bulk-fill composite resins stress distribution in primary molar tooth inlay cavity.
Guler MS
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2024 Mar; 27(3):411-418. PubMed ID: 37216569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Occlusal stress distribution and remaining crack propagation of a cracked tooth treated with different materials and designs: 3D finite element analysis.
Kim SY; Kim BS; Kim H; Cho SY
Dent Mater; 2021 Apr; 37(4):731-740. PubMed ID: 33589271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Co-Influence of Restoration Bonding and Inlay Cavity Design on Fracture Load of Restored Tooth.
Yli-Urpo T; Lassila L; Vallittu P; Närhi T
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2024 Feb; 32(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 37549134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of fracture resistance of teeth restored with ceramic inlay and resin composite: an in vitro study.
Desai PD; Das UK
Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(6):877. PubMed ID: 22484893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of material and loading location on stress distribution of inlays.
Costa VCD; Machado AC; Soares PV; Raposo LH; Vasconcellos AB
Am J Dent; 2021 Jun; 34(3):171-176. PubMed ID: 34143589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
