These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

375 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25938252)

  • 1. Contingent capture effects in temporal order judgments.
    Born S; Kerzel D; Pratt J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Aug; 41(4):995-1006. PubMed ID: 25938252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Attentional capture by a color singleton is stronger at spatially relevant than irrelevant locations: Evidence from an ERP study.
    Su Y; Huang W; Yang N; Yan K; Ding Y; Qu Z
    Psychophysiology; 2020 Oct; 57(10):e13640. PubMed ID: 33460208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The role of top-down spatial attention in contingent attentional capture.
    Huang W; Su Y; Zhen Y; Qu Z
    Psychophysiology; 2016 May; 53(5):650-62. PubMed ID: 26879628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The role of relational information in contingent capture.
    Becker SI; Folk CL; Remington RW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1460-76. PubMed ID: 20919781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Optimal task-sets override attentional capture by rare cues.
    Schönhammer JG; Kerzel D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 May; 44(5):681-692. PubMed ID: 29154636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dissociating location-specific inhibition and attention shifts: evidence against the disengagement account of contingent capture.
    Anderson BA; Folk CL
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Aug; 74(6):1183-98. PubMed ID: 22673857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Contingent attentional capture by conceptually relevant images.
    Wyble B; Folk C; Potter MC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Jun; 39(3):861-71. PubMed ID: 23163786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Unexpected abrupt onsets can override a top-down set for color.
    Folk CL; Remington RW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Aug; 41(4):1153-65. PubMed ID: 26030438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Feature-based attention is functionally distinct from relation-based attention: The double dissociation between color-based capture and color-relation-based capture of attention.
    Du F; Jiao J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Apr; 42(4):480-93. PubMed ID: 26523490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Towards a resolution of the attentional-capture debate.
    Carmel T; Lamy D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Dec; 41(6):1772-82. PubMed ID: 26280266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Distinct roles of the intraparietal sulcus and temporoparietal junction in attentional capture from distractor features: An individual differences approach.
    Painter DR; Dux PE; Mattingley JB
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Jul; 74():50-62. PubMed ID: 25724234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Feature-based statistical regularities of distractors modulate attentional capture.
    Stilwell BT; Bahle B; Vecera SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Mar; 45(3):419-433. PubMed ID: 30802131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparing temporal order judgments and choice reaction time tasks as indices of exogenous spatial cuing.
    Eskes GA; Klein RM; Dove MB; Coolican J; Shore DI
    J Neurosci Methods; 2007 Nov; 166(2):259-65. PubMed ID: 17889372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Contingent attentional capture across multiple feature dimensions in a temporal search task.
    Ito M; Kawahara JI
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2016 Jan; 163():107-13. PubMed ID: 26637932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Using response time distributions to examine top-down influences on attentional capture.
    Burnham BR
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Feb; 75(2):257-77. PubMed ID: 23151961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Contingent attentional capture by top-down control settings: converging evidence from event-related potentials.
    Lien MC; Ruthruff E; Goodin Z; Remington RW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Jun; 34(3):509-30. PubMed ID: 18505320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Overt attention in contextual cuing of visual search is driven by the attentional set, but not by the predictiveness of distractors.
    Beesley T; Hanafi G; Vadillo MA; Shanks DR; Livesey EJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 May; 44(5):707-721. PubMed ID: 29608077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Contingent capture can occur at specific feature values: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.
    Jiao J; Zhao G; Wang Q; Zhang K; Li H; Sun HJ; Liu Q
    Biol Psychol; 2013 Feb; 92(2):125-34. PubMed ID: 23069637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Contingent capture is weakened in search for multiple features from different dimensions.
    Biderman D; Biderman N; Zivony A; Lamy D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Dec; 43(12):1974-1992. PubMed ID: 28425733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Additivity of abrupt onset effects supports nonspatial distraction, not the capture of spatial attention.
    Folk CL; Remington RW; Wu SC
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Feb; 71(2):308-13. PubMed ID: 19304620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.