These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25938502)

  • 1. Distribution characteristics of normal pure-tone thresholds.
    Margolis RH; Wilson RH; Popelka GR; Eikelboom RH; Swanepoel de W; Saly GL
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54(11):796-805. PubMed ID: 25938502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Diagnostic Hearing Assessment in Schools: Validity and Time Efficiency of Automated Audiometry.
    Mahomed-Asmail F; Swanepoel de W; Eikelboom RH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Jan; 27(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 26809325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Distribution Characteristics of Air-Bone Gaps: Evidence of Bias in Manual Audiometry.
    Margolis RH; Wilson RH; Popelka GR; Eikelboom RH; Swanepoel de W; Saly GL
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(2):177-88. PubMed ID: 26627469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Automated Audiometry in Quiet and Simulated Exam Room Noise for Listeners with Normal Hearing and Impaired Hearing.
    Bean BN; Roberts RA; Picou EM; Angley GP; Edwards AJ
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2022 Jan; 33(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 34034339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hearing assessment-reliability, accuracy, and efficiency of automated audiometry.
    Swanepoel de W; Mngemane S; Molemong S; Mkwanazi H; Tutshini S
    Telemed J E Health; 2010 Jun; 16(5):557-63. PubMed ID: 20575723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reliability of the Home Hearing Test: Implications for Public Health.
    Mosley CL; Langley LM; Davis A; McMahon CM; Tremblay KL
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Mar; 30(3):208-216. PubMed ID: 30461396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Computer-assisted audiometry versus manual audiometry.
    Ho AT; Hildreth AJ; Lindsey L
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Oct; 30(7):876-83. PubMed ID: 20179426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The relationship between high-frequency pure-tone hearing loss, hearing in noise test (HINT) thresholds, and the articulation index.
    Vermiglio AJ; Soli SD; Freed DJ; Fisher LM
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012; 23(10):779-88. PubMed ID: 23169195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical validation of the AMTAS automated audiometer.
    Eikelboom RH; Swanepoel de W; Motakef S; Upson GS
    Int J Audiol; 2013 May; 52(5):342-9. PubMed ID: 23548148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A treatise on the thresholds of interoctave frequencies: 1500, 3000, and 6000 Hz.
    Wilson RH; McArdle R
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Feb; 25(2):171-86. PubMed ID: 24828218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. High-frequency pure-tone audiometry in children: a test-retest reliability study relative to ototoxic criteria.
    Beahan N; Kei J; Driscoll C; Charles B; Khan A
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(1):104-11. PubMed ID: 21760512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Test-retest reliability of distortion-product thresholds compared to behavioral auditory thresholds.
    Bader K; Dierkes L; Braun LH; Gummer AW; Dalhoff E; Zelle D
    Hear Res; 2021 Jul; 406():108232. PubMed ID: 33984603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparisons of air-conduction hearing thresholds between manual and automated methods in a commercial audiometer.
    Liu H; Fu X; Li M; Wang S
    Front Neurosci; 2023; 17():1292395. PubMed ID: 38188027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reference equivalent threshold sound pressure levels for the Wireless Automated Hearing Test System.
    Clavier OH; Norris JA; Hinckley DW; Martin WH; Lee SY; Soli SD; Brungart DS; Schurman JR; Larsen E; Mehraei G; Quigley TM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Jul; 152(1):601. PubMed ID: 35931498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Extended high-frequency audiometry in healthy adults with different age groups.
    Wang M; Ai Y; Han Y; Fan Z; Shi P; Wang H
    J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2021 Aug; 50(1):52. PubMed ID: 34446093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Validity of automated threshold audiometry: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Mahomed F; Swanepoel de W; Eikelboom RH; Soer M
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(6):745-52. PubMed ID: 24165302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Using a combination of click- and tone burst-evoked auditory brain stem response measurements to estimate pure-tone thresholds.
    Gorga MP; Johnson TA; Kaminski JR; Beauchaine KL; Garner CA; Neely ST
    Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):60-74. PubMed ID: 16446565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Infant air and bone conduction tone burst auditory brain stem responses for classification of hearing loss and the relationship to behavioral thresholds.
    Vander Werff KR; Prieve BA; Georgantas LM
    Ear Hear; 2009 Jun; 30(3):350-68. PubMed ID: 19322084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Utilizing True Wireless Stereo Earbuds in Automated Pure-Tone Audiometry.
    Guo Z; Yu G; Zhou H; Wang X; Lu Y; Meng Q
    Trends Hear; 2021; 25():23312165211057367. PubMed ID: 34796771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Determining the pure tone frequencies to be used in identification audiometry.
    Katt D; Sprague H
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1981 Nov; 46(4):433-6. PubMed ID: 7300270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.