These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25938502)

  • 21. Validation of web-based audiometry version of HEARZAP.
    P PR; Ramkumar V
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(3):e0283519. PubMed ID: 36976819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Identification of conductive hearing loss using air conduction tests alone: reliability and validity of an automatic test battery.
    Convery E; Keidser G; Seeto M; Freeston K; Zhou D; Dillon H
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(1):e1-8. PubMed ID: 24080948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Accuracy of automated pure-tone audiometry in population-based samples of older adults.
    Hoff M; Göthberg H; Tengstrand T; Rosenhall U; Skoog I; Sadeghi A
    Int J Audiol; 2024 Aug; 63(8):622-630. PubMed ID: 37335133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Accuracy of Mobile-Based Audiometry in the Evaluation of Hearing Loss in Quiet and Noisy Environments.
    Saliba J; Al-Reefi M; Carriere JS; Verma N; Provencal C; Rappaport JM
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2017 Apr; 156(4):706-711. PubMed ID: 28025906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison between thresholds obtained with pure-tone audiometry and the 40-Hz middle latency response.
    Kankkunen A; Rosenhall U
    Scand Audiol; 1985; 14(2):99-104. PubMed ID: 4023605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Clinical experience with the words-in-noise test on 3430 veterans: comparisons with pure-tone thresholds and word recognition in quiet.
    Wilson RH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011; 22(7):405-23. PubMed ID: 21993048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Extended High-Frequency Smartphone Audiometry: Validity and Reliability.
    Bornman M; Swanepoel W; De Jager LB; Eikelboom RH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Mar; 30(3):217-226. PubMed ID: 30461416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Hearing thresholds and cognitive flexibility in young healthy individuals with normal hearing.
    Brännström KJ; Kastberg T; Waechter S; Karlsson E
    Int J Audiol; 2020 Aug; 59(8):583-589. PubMed ID: 32149537
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Validation of the Home Hearing Test™.
    Margolis RH; Killion MC; Bratt GW; Saly GL
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 May; 27(5):416-420. PubMed ID: 27179261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The pure-tone hearing thresholds of otologically healthy 14-year-old children.
    Rahko-Laitila P; Karma P; Laippala P; Salmelin R; Sipilä M; Manninen M; Rahko T
    Audiology; 2001; 40(4):171-7. PubMed ID: 11521708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. AMTAS: automated method for testing auditory sensitivity: validation studies.
    Margolis RH; Glasberg BR; Creeke S; Moore BC
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Mar; 49(3):185-94. PubMed ID: 20109081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of the hearing threshold measured by manual pure-tone and by self-recording (Békésy) audiometry.
    Erlandsson B; Håkanson H; Ivarsson A; Nilsson P
    Audiology; 1979; 18(5):414-29. PubMed ID: 496724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Some observations on the nature of the audiometric 4000 hz notch: data from 3430 veterans.
    Wilson RH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 Jan; 22(1):23-33. PubMed ID: 21419067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Pure-tone audiometry without bone-conduction thresholds: using the digits-in-noise test to detect conductive hearing loss.
    De Sousa KC; Smits C; Moore DR; Myburgh HC; Swanepoel W
    Int J Audiol; 2020 Oct; 59(10):801-808. PubMed ID: 32609044
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Smartphone threshold audiometry in underserved primary health-care contexts.
    Sandström J; Swanepoel de W; Carel Myburgh H; Laurent C
    Int J Audiol; 2016; 55(4):232-8. PubMed ID: 26795898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A Large-Scale Examination of Veterans with Normal Pure-Tone Hearing Thresholds within the Department of Veterans Affairs.
    Billings CJ; Dillard LK; Hoskins ZB; Penman TM; Reavis KM
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2018; 29(10):928-935. PubMed ID: 30479265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparative study between pure tone audiometry and auditory steady-state responses in normal hearing subjects.
    Beck RM; Ramos BF; Grasel SS; Ramos HF; Moraes MF; Almeida ER; Bento RF
    Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2014; 80(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 24626890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. AMTAS(®): automated method for testing auditory sensitivity: II. air conduction audiograms in children and adults.
    Margolis RH; Frisina R; Walton JP
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Jul; 50(7):434-9. PubMed ID: 21417674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Application of auditory brainstem response (ABR) and 40 Hz auditory event related potential (40 Hz AERP) to the diagnosis of occupational noise-induced hearing impairment].
    Xia YJ; Hao FT; Wang CY; Li JL; Fu X
    Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2012 Mar; 30(3):196-8. PubMed ID: 22804888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Predicting the degree of hearing loss using click auditory brainstem response in babies referred from newborn hearing screening.
    Baldwin M; Watkin P
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):361-9. PubMed ID: 23340456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.