These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

272 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25938722)

  • 1. Structural interdependence in teams: An integrative framework and meta-analysis.
    Courtright SH; Thurgood GR; Stewart GL; Pierotti AJ
    J Appl Psychol; 2015 Nov; 100(6):1825-46. PubMed ID: 25938722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. When do bad apples not spoil the barrel? Negative relationships in teams, team performance, and buffering mechanisms.
    de Jong JP; Curşeu PL; Leenders RT
    J Appl Psychol; 2014 May; 99(3):514-22. PubMed ID: 24661274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Individual deals within teams: Investigating the role of relative i-deals for employee performance.
    Vidyarthi PR; Singh S; Erdogan B; Chaudhry A; Posthuma R; Anand S
    J Appl Psychol; 2016 Nov; 101(11):1536-1552. PubMed ID: 27513681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cooperative outcome interdependence, task reflexivity, and team effectiveness: a motivated information processing perspective.
    De Dreu CK
    J Appl Psychol; 2007 May; 92(3):628-38. PubMed ID: 17484546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cohesion and performance in groups: a meta-analytic clarification of construct relations.
    Beal DJ; Cohen RR; Burke MJ; McLendon CL
    J Appl Psychol; 2003 Dec; 88(6):989-1004. PubMed ID: 14640811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The cognitive underpinnings of effective teamwork: a meta-analysis.
    DeChurch LA; Mesmer-Magnus JR
    J Appl Psychol; 2010 Jan; 95(1):32-53. PubMed ID: 20085405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Collective goals and shared tasks: interdependence structure and perceptions of individual sport team environments.
    Evans MB; Eys MA
    Scand J Med Sci Sports; 2015 Feb; 25(1):e139-48. PubMed ID: 24738561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Transactive memory system links work team characteristics and performance.
    Zhang ZX; Hempel PS; Han YL; Tjosvold D
    J Appl Psychol; 2007 Nov; 92(6):1722-30. PubMed ID: 18020808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A meta-analysis of team-efficacy, potency, and performance: interdependence and level of analysis as moderators of observed relationships.
    Gully SM; Incalcaterra KA; Joshi A; Beauien JM
    J Appl Psychol; 2002 Oct; 87(5):819-32. PubMed ID: 12395807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reflexivity in Teams: A Review and New Perspectives.
    Konradt U; Otte KP; Schippers MC; Steenfatt C
    J Psychol; 2016; 150(2):153-74. PubMed ID: 26457836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Information sharing and team performance: a meta-analysis.
    Mesmer-Magnus JR; Dechurch LA
    J Appl Psychol; 2009 Mar; 94(2):535-46. PubMed ID: 19271807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Trust and team performance: A meta-analysis of main effects, moderators, and covariates.
    De Jong BA; Dirks KT; Gillespie N
    J Appl Psychol; 2016 Aug; 101(8):1134-50. PubMed ID: 27123697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Leadership and member voice in action teams: Test of a dynamic phase model.
    Farh CIC; Chen G
    J Appl Psychol; 2018 Jan; 103(1):97-110. PubMed ID: 28836799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Characteristics of work groups and their relationship with social and task cohesion in student teams.
    Forrester WR; Tashchian A
    Psychol Rep; 2004 Aug; 95(1):207-14. PubMed ID: 15460377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Team learning and effectiveness in virtual project teams: the role of beliefs about interpersonal context.
    Ortega A; Sánchez-Manzanares M; Gil F; Rico R
    Span J Psychol; 2010 May; 13(1):267-76. PubMed ID: 20480695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A contingency model of conflict and team effectiveness.
    Shaw JD; Zhu J; Duffy MK; Scott KL; Shih HA; Susanto E
    J Appl Psychol; 2011 Mar; 96(2):391-400. PubMed ID: 20939655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quality charters or quality members? A control theory perspective on team charters and team performance.
    Courtright SH; McCormick BW; Mistry S; Wang J
    J Appl Psychol; 2017 Oct; 102(10):1462-1470. PubMed ID: 28530414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Demographic faultlines: a meta-analysis of the literature.
    Thatcher SM; Patel PC
    J Appl Psychol; 2011 Nov; 96(6):1119-39. PubMed ID: 21688882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Working together versus working autonomously: a new power-dependence perspective on the individual-level of analysis.
    de Jong SB
    Span J Psychol; 2014; 17():E37. PubMed ID: 25012811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cohesion, team mental models, and collective efficacy: towards an integrated framework of team dynamics in sport.
    Filho E; Tenenbaum G; Yang Y
    J Sports Sci; 2015; 33(6):641-53. PubMed ID: 25385557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.