200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25939083)
1. Effect of Implant Thread Geometry on Secondary Stability, Bone Density, and Bone-to-Implant Contact: A Biomechanical and Histological Analysis.
Trisi P; Berardini M; Falco A; Podaliri Vulpiani M
Implant Dent; 2015 Aug; 24(4):384-91. PubMed ID: 25939083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Correlation Between Implant Geometry, Implant Surface, Insertion Torque, and Primary Stability: In Vitro Biomechanical Analysis.
Falco A; Berardini M; Trisi P
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(4):824-830. PubMed ID: 30024998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Validation of value of actual micromotion as a direct measure of implant micromobility after healing (secondary implant stability). An in vivo histologic and biomechanical study.
Trisi P; Berardini M; Falco A; Podaliri Vulpiani M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Nov; 27(11):1423-1430. PubMed ID: 26727557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dental implant thread pitch and its influence on the osseointegration process: an in vivo comparison study.
Orsini E; Giavaresi G; Trirè A; Ottani V; Salgarello S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(2):383-92. PubMed ID: 22442779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The impact of a modified cutting flute implant design on osseointegration.
Jimbo R; Tovar N; Marin C; Teixeira HS; Anchieta RB; Silveira LM; Janal MN; Shibli JA; Coelho PG
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 43(7):883-8. PubMed ID: 24583140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of implant thread geometry on percentage of osseointegration and resistance to reverse torque in the tibia of rabbits.
Steigenga J; Al-Shammari K; Misch C; Nociti FH; Wang HL
J Periodontol; 2004 Sep; 75(9):1233-41. PubMed ID: 15515339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Increased bone formation around coated implants.
Stadlinger B; Bierbaum S; Grimmer S; Schulz MC; Kuhlisch E; Scharnweber D; Eckelt U; Mai R
J Clin Periodontol; 2009 Aug; 36(8):698-704. PubMed ID: 19531092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bone-implant interface around titanium implants under different loading conditions: a histomorphometrical analysis in the Macaca fascicularis monkey.
Romanos GE; Toh CG; Siar CH; Wicht H; Yacoob H; Nentwig GH
J Periodontol; 2003 Oct; 74(10):1483-90. PubMed ID: 14653395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A New Highly Hydrophilic Electrochemical Implant Titanium Surface: A Histological and Biomechanical In Vivo Study.
Trisi P; Berardini M; Falco A; Sandrini E; Vulpiani MP
Implant Dent; 2017 Jun; 26(3):429-437. PubMed ID: 28492424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of fixation of expandable implants in the mandibles of ovariectomized sheep.
Xiao JR; Li DH; Chen YX; Chen SJ; Guan SM; Kong L
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Apr; 71(4):682-8. PubMed ID: 23298803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In Vivo Evaluation of Dual Acid-Etched and Grit-Blasted/Acid-Etched Implants With Identical Macrogeometry in High-Density Bone.
Jinno Y; Jimbo R; Tovar N; Teixeira HS; Witek L; Coelho PG
Implant Dent; 2017 Dec; 26(6):815-819. PubMed ID: 29064857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Histologic and histomorphometric evaluation of peri-implant bone subjected to immediate loading: an experimental study with Macaca fascicularis.
Romanos GE; Toh CG; Siar CH; Swaminathan D
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 11858574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. High versus low implant insertion torque: a histologic, histomorphometric, and biomechanical study in the sheep mandible.
Trisi P; Todisco M; Consolo U; Travaglini D
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):837-49. PubMed ID: 21841994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Histological, radiological and histomorphometric evaluation of immediate vs. non-immediate loading of a zirconia implant with surface treatment in a dog model.
Calvo-Guirado JL; Aguilar-Salvatierra A; Gomez-Moreno G; Guardia J; Delgado-Ruiz RA; Mate-Sanchez de Val JE
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Jul; 25(7):826-30. PubMed ID: 23551427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The biomechanical analysis of simulating implants in function under osteoporotic jawbone by comparing cylindrical, apical tapered, neck tapered, and expandable type implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
Xiao JR; Li YF; Guan SM; Song L; Xu LX; Kong L
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jul; 69(7):e273-81. PubMed ID: 21367505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Study of the osseointegration of dental implants placed with an adapted surgical technique.
Al-Marshood MM; Junker R; Al-Rasheed A; Al Farraj Aldosari A; Jansen JA; Anil S
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Jul; 22(7):753-759. PubMed ID: 21198894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of implant geometry and surface characteristics on progressive osseointegration.
Geurs NC; Jeffcoat RL; McGlumphy EA; Reddy MS; Jeffcoat MK
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(6):811-5. PubMed ID: 12507240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of stress pattern generated through various thread designs of dental implants loaded in a condition of immediately after placement and on osseointegration--an FEA study.
Chowdhary R; Halldin A; Jimbo R; Wennerberg A
Implant Dent; 2013 Feb; 22(1):91-6. PubMed ID: 23287982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Resonance frequency measurements in vivo and related surface properties of magnesium-incorporated, micropatterned and magnesium-incorporated TiUnite, Osseotite, SLA and TiOblast implants.
Sul YT; Jönsson J; Yoon GS; Johansson C
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Oct; 20(10):1146-55. PubMed ID: 19719742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Implant stability measurements for implants placed at the time of extraction: a cohort, prospective clinical trial.
Becker W; Sennerby L; Bedrossian E; Becker BE; Lucchini JP
J Periodontol; 2005 Mar; 76(3):391-7. PubMed ID: 15857073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
