54 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25939083)
21. Comparison of Resonance Frequency Analysis and of Quantitative Ultrasound to Assess Dental Implant Osseointegration.
Vayron R; Nguyen VH; Lecuelle B; Albini Lomami H; Meningaud JP; Bosc R; Haiat G
Sensors (Basel); 2018 May; 18(5):. PubMed ID: 29724028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Assessment of Temperature Rise and Time of Alveolar Ridge Splitting by Means of Er:YAG Laser, Piezosurgery, and Surgical Saw: An Ex Vivo Study.
Matys J; Flieger R; Dominiak M
Biomed Res Int; 2016; 2016():9654975. PubMed ID: 27957502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. New Osseodensification Implant Site Preparation Method to Increase Bone Density in Low-Density Bone: In Vivo Evaluation in Sheep.
Trisi P; Berardini M; Falco A; Podaliri Vulpiani M
Implant Dent; 2016 Feb; 25(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 26584202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Correlation Between Implant Geometry, Implant Surface, Insertion Torque, and Primary Stability: In Vitro Biomechanical Analysis.
Falco A; Berardini M; Trisi P
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(4):824-830. PubMed ID: 30024998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Validation of value of actual micromotion as a direct measure of implant micromobility after healing (secondary implant stability). An in vivo histologic and biomechanical study.
Trisi P; Berardini M; Falco A; Podaliri Vulpiani M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Nov; 27(11):1423-1430. PubMed ID: 26727557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Dental implant thread pitch and its influence on the osseointegration process: an in vivo comparison study.
Orsini E; Giavaresi G; Trirè A; Ottani V; Salgarello S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(2):383-92. PubMed ID: 22442779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The impact of a modified cutting flute implant design on osseointegration.
Jimbo R; Tovar N; Marin C; Teixeira HS; Anchieta RB; Silveira LM; Janal MN; Shibli JA; Coelho PG
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 43(7):883-8. PubMed ID: 24583140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Effects of implant thread geometry on percentage of osseointegration and resistance to reverse torque in the tibia of rabbits.
Steigenga J; Al-Shammari K; Misch C; Nociti FH; Wang HL
J Periodontol; 2004 Sep; 75(9):1233-41. PubMed ID: 15515339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Effect of Implant Thread Geometry on Secondary Stability, Bone Density, and Bone-to-Implant Contact: A Biomechanical and Histological Analysis.
Trisi P; Berardini M; Falco A; Podaliri Vulpiani M
Implant Dent; 2015 Aug; 24(4):384-91. PubMed ID: 25939083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The effect of thread pattern upon implant osseointegration.
Abuhussein H; Pagni G; Rebaudi A; Wang HL
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Feb; 21(2):129-36. PubMed ID: 19709058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Can Osseointegration Be Achieved Without Primary Stability?
Al-Sabbagh M; Eldomiaty W; Khabbaz Y
Dent Clin North Am; 2019 Jul; 63(3):461-473. PubMed ID: 31097138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Dental implant design and its relationship to long-term implant success.
Steigenga JT; al-Shammari KF; Nociti FH; Misch CE; Wang HL
Implant Dent; 2003; 12(4):306-17. PubMed ID: 14752967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A review of nondestructive test methods and their application to measure the stability and osseointegration of bone anchored endosseous implants.
Meredith N
Crit Rev Biomed Eng; 1998; 26(4):275-91. PubMed ID: 10065892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
