BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25939979)

  • 1. Multiple imputation of missing covariate values in multilevel models with random slopes: a cautionary note.
    Grund S; Lüdtke O; Robitzsch A
    Behav Res Methods; 2016 Jun; 48(2):640-9. PubMed ID: 25939979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of multiple imputation methods for handling missing values in longitudinal data in the presence of a time-varying covariate with a non-linear association with time: a simulation study.
    De Silva AP; Moreno-Betancur M; De Livera AM; Lee KJ; Simpson JA
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Jul; 17(1):114. PubMed ID: 28743256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of multiple imputation methods for missing data in longitudinal studies.
    Huque MH; Carlin JB; Simpson JA; Lee KJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Dec; 18(1):168. PubMed ID: 30541455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Multiple imputation by predictive mean matching in cluster-randomized trials.
    Bailey BE; Andridge R; Shoben AB
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Mar; 20(1):72. PubMed ID: 32228491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Multiple imputation of missing data in multilevel models with the R package mdmb: a flexible sequential modeling approach.
    Grund S; Lüdtke O; Robitzsch A
    Behav Res Methods; 2021 Dec; 53(6):2631-2649. PubMed ID: 34027594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bias and efficiency of multiple imputation compared with complete-case analysis for missing covariate values.
    White IR; Carlin JB
    Stat Med; 2010 Dec; 29(28):2920-31. PubMed ID: 20842622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Imputation of missing covariate in randomized controlled trials with a continuous outcome: Scoping review and new results.
    Kayembe MT; Jolani S; Tan FES; van Breukelen GJP
    Pharm Stat; 2020 Nov; 19(6):840-860. PubMed ID: 32510791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Explicating the Conditions Under Which Multilevel Multiple Imputation Mitigates Bias Resulting from Random Coefficient-Dependent Missing Longitudinal Data.
    Gottfredson NC; Sterba SK; Jackson KM
    Prev Sci; 2017 Jan; 18(1):12-19. PubMed ID: 27866307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multiple Imputation in Multilevel Models. A Revision of the Current Software and Usage Examples for Researchers.
    García-Patos P; Olmos R
    Span J Psychol; 2020 Nov; 23():e46. PubMed ID: 33176896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dealing with missing outcome data in randomized trials and observational studies.
    Groenwold RH; Donders AR; Roes KC; Harrell FE; Moons KG
    Am J Epidemiol; 2012 Feb; 175(3):210-7. PubMed ID: 22262640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of different methods to handle missing data in the context of propensity score analysis.
    Choi J; Dekkers OM; le Cessie S
    Eur J Epidemiol; 2019 Jan; 34(1):23-36. PubMed ID: 30341708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multiple imputation in veterinary epidemiological studies: a case study and simulation.
    Dohoo IR; Nielsen CR; Emanuelson U
    Prev Vet Med; 2016 Jul; 129():35-47. PubMed ID: 27317321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Comparison of Multilevel Imputation Schemes for Random Coefficient Models: Fully Conditional Specification and Joint Model Imputation with Random Covariance Matrices.
    Enders CK; Hayes T; Du H
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2018; 53(5):695-713. PubMed ID: 30693802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Missing data strategies for time-varying confounders in comparative effectiveness studies of non-missing time-varying exposures and right-censored outcomes.
    Desai M; Montez-Rath ME; Kapphahn K; Joyce VR; Mathur MB; Garcia A; Purington N; Owens DK
    Stat Med; 2019 Jul; 38(17):3204-3220. PubMed ID: 31099433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Substantive model compatible multilevel multiple imputation: A joint modeling approach.
    Quartagno M; Carpenter JR
    Stat Med; 2022 Nov; 41(25):5000-5015. PubMed ID: 35959539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biases in multilevel analyses caused by cluster-specific fixed-effects imputation.
    Speidel M; Drechsler J; Sakshaug JW
    Behav Res Methods; 2018 Oct; 50(5):1824-1840. PubMed ID: 28840562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Population-calibrated multiple imputation for a binary/categorical covariate in categorical regression models.
    Pham TM; Carpenter JR; Morris TP; Wood AM; Petersen I
    Stat Med; 2019 Feb; 38(5):792-808. PubMed ID: 30328123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multiple imputation with sequential penalized regression.
    Zahid FM; Heumann C
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 May; 28(5):1311-1327. PubMed ID: 29451087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Maximum likelihood versus multiple imputation for missing data in small longitudinal samples with nonnormality.
    Shin T; Davison ML; Long JD
    Psychol Methods; 2017 Sep; 22(3):426-449. PubMed ID: 27709974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of a weighting approach for performing sensitivity analysis after multiple imputation.
    Rezvan PH; White IR; Lee KJ; Carlin JB; Simpson JA
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2015 Oct; 15():83. PubMed ID: 26464305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.