88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25940177)
1. [Comparative study of clinical efficacy between abdominoperineal resection and anterior resection procedure in patients with rectal cancer].
Shen Z; Ye Y; Zhang X; Xie Q; Yin M; Yang X; Jiang K; Liang B; Wang S
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Apr; 18(4):349-53. PubMed ID: 25940177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Oncological outcomes after total mesorectal excision for cure for cancer of the lower rectum: anterior vs. abdominoperineal resection.
Wibe A; Syse A; Andersen E; Tretli S; Myrvold HE; Søreide O;
Dis Colon Rectum; 2004 Jan; 47(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 14719151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Factors associated with oncologic outcomes after abdominoperineal resection compared with restorative resection for low rectal cancer: patient- and tumor-related or technical factors only?
Reshef A; Lavery I; Kiran RP
Dis Colon Rectum; 2012 Jan; 55(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 22156867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of the clinical results of abdominoperanal intersphincteric resection and abdominoperineal resection for lower rectal cancer.
Tsukamoto S; Kanemitsu Y; Shida D; Ochiai H; Mazaki J
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2017 May; 32(5):683-689. PubMed ID: 28091845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Better operative outcomes achieved with the prone jackknife vs. lithotomy position during abdominoperineal resection in patients with low rectal cancer.
Liu P; Bao H; Zhang X; Zhang J; Ma L; Wang Y; Li C; Wang Z; Gong P
World J Surg Oncol; 2015 Feb; 13():39. PubMed ID: 25889121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A retrospective analysis of ultralow anterior resection vs. abdomino-perineal resection for lower rectal cancer.
Yang Z; Xu H; Zhang W; Xu Y; Xu Z
Hepatogastroenterology; 2012 Sep; 59(118):1780-3. PubMed ID: 22246189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Oncological results according to type of resection for rectal cancer.
Ciga Lozano MÁ; Codina Cazador A; Ortiz Hurtado H;
Cir Esp; 2015 Apr; 93(4):229-35. PubMed ID: 25438774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Effects of tumor distance from anal verge and types of operations on survival outcomes for low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy].
Xiao Y; Wu B; Qiu H; Xiong G; Lin G; Zhong G; Hu K; Pan W
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2014 Jun; 94(22):1705-9. PubMed ID: 25151899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Changing operative strategy from abdominoperineal resection to sphincter preservation in T3 low rectal cancer after downstaging by neoadjuvant chemoradiation: a preliminary report.
Madbouly KM; Hussein AM
World J Surg; 2015 May; 39(5):1248-56. PubMed ID: 25561197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Risk factors for adverse outcome in patients with rectal cancer treated with an abdominoperineal resection in the total mesorectal excision trial.
den Dulk M; Marijnen CA; Putter H; Rutten HJ; Beets GL; Wiggers T; Nagtegaal ID; van de Velde CJ
Ann Surg; 2007 Jul; 246(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 17592295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Prognosis factors for the perineal incision complications after abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer].
Luo S; Liang JW; Zhou HT; Pei W; Zhou ZX; Liu Q; Wang XS
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Nov; 55(11):842-846. PubMed ID: 29136732
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Risk factors of postoperative urinary retention after rectal cancer surgery].
Zhao Y; Hou X; Zhao Y; Feng Y; Zhang B; Zhao K
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Mar; 20(3):295-299. PubMed ID: 28338163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of three-year oncological results after restorative low anterior resection, non-restorative low anterior resection and abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer.
Hol JC; Burghgraef TA; Rutgers MLW; Crolla RMPH; van Geloven NAW; Leijtens JWA; Polat F; Pronk A; Smits AB; Tuynman JB; Verdaasdonk EGG; Consten ECJ; Hompes R; Sietses C
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2023 Apr; 49(4):730-737. PubMed ID: 36460530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative quality of life in patients following abdominoperineal excision and low anterior resection for low rectal cancer.
How P; Stelzner S; Branagan G; Bundy K; Chandrakumaran K; Heald RJ; Moran B
Dis Colon Rectum; 2012 Apr; 55(4):400-6. PubMed ID: 22426263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Randomized clinical trial of conventional versus cylindrical abdominoperineal resection for locally advanced lower rectal cancer.
Han JG; Wang ZJ; Wei GH; Gao ZG; Yang Y; Zhao BC
Am J Surg; 2012 Sep; 204(3):274-82. PubMed ID: 22920402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Technical, functional, and oncological validity of robot-assisted total-intersphincteric resection (T-ISR) for lower rectal cancer.
Kim JC; Lee JL; Kim CW; Kim JR; Kim J; Park SH
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2023 Jan; 49(1):188-195. PubMed ID: 35864011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Results of treatment of distal rectal carcinoma since the introduction of total mesorectal excision: a single unit experience, 1994-2003.
Chiappa A; Biffi R; Zbar AP; Luca F; Crotti C; Bertani E; Biella F; Zampino G; Orecchia R; Fazio N; Venturino M; Crosta C; Pruneri GC; Grassi C; Andreoni B
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2005 May; 20(3):221-30. PubMed ID: 15602647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Long-term oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic vs open surgery for stages II and III rectal cancer: A retrospective cohort study.
Zhou ZX; Zhao LY; Lin T; Liu H; Deng HJ; Zhu HL; Yan J; Li GX
World J Gastroenterol; 2015 May; 21(18):5505-12. PubMed ID: 25987773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Comparison of short-term outcomes of transrectal specimen extraction during laparoscopic sigmoid radical resection versus conventional laparoscopically assisted procedure].
Xing J; Zhang C; Yang X; Wang H; Wang H; Yu E; Fu C
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Jun; 20(6):665-670. PubMed ID: 28643312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Examination of outcome following abdominoperineal resection for adenocarcinoma in Oxford.
Chambers W; Khan A; Waters R; Lindsey I; George B; Mortensen N; Cunningham C
Colorectal Dis; 2010 Dec; 12(12):1192-7. PubMed ID: 19519690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
