These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
340 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25942577)
21. Inferring linkage disequilibrium between a polymorphic marker locus and a trait locus in natural populations. Luo ZW; Tao SH; Zeng ZB Genetics; 2000 Sep; 156(1):457-67. PubMed ID: 10978308 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Impact of prior specifications in a shrinkage-inducing Bayesian model for quantitative trait mapping and genomic prediction. Knürr T; Läärä E; Sillanpää MJ Genet Sel Evol; 2013 Jul; 45(1):24. PubMed ID: 23834140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Effects of marker density and population structure on the genomic prediction accuracy for growth trait in Pacific white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei. Wang Q; Yu Y; Yuan J; Zhang X; Huang H; Li F; Xiang J BMC Genet; 2017 May; 18(1):45. PubMed ID: 28514941 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Average semivariance yields accurate estimates of the fraction of marker-associated genetic variance and heritability in complex trait analyses. Feldmann MJ; Piepho HP; Bridges WC; Knapp SJ PLoS Genet; 2021 Aug; 17(8):e1009762. PubMed ID: 34437540 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Contributions of linkage disequilibrium and co-segregation information to the accuracy of genomic prediction. Sun X; Fernando R; Dekkers J Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Oct; 48(1):77. PubMed ID: 27729012 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Power of linkage versus association analysis of quantitative traits, by use of variance-components models, for sibship data. Sham PC; Cherny SS; Purcell S; Hewitt JK Am J Hum Genet; 2000 May; 66(5):1616-30. PubMed ID: 10762547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Regional heritability mapping and genome-wide association identify loci for complex growth, wood and disease resistance traits in Eucalyptus. Resende RT; Resende MD; Silva FF; Azevedo CF; Takahashi EK; Silva-Junior OB; Grattapaglia D New Phytol; 2017 Feb; 213(3):1287-1300. PubMed ID: 28079935 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Bayesian estimation of genetic parameters for multivariate threshold and continuous phenotypes and molecular genetic data in simulated horse populations using Gibbs sampling. Stock KF; Distl O; Hoeschele I BMC Genet; 2007 May; 8():19. PubMed ID: 17490471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Determination of the optimal number of markers and individuals in a training population necessary for maximum prediction accuracy in F Peixoto LA; Bhering LL; Cruz CD Genet Mol Res; 2016 Nov; 15(4):. PubMed ID: 27886337 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Heritability in the genomics era--concepts and misconceptions. Visscher PM; Hill WG; Wray NR Nat Rev Genet; 2008 Apr; 9(4):255-66. PubMed ID: 18319743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. How to estimate heritability: a guide for genetic epidemiologists. Barry CS; Walker VM; Cheesman R; Davey Smith G; Morris TT; Davies NM Int J Epidemiol; 2023 Apr; 52(2):624-632. PubMed ID: 36427280 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Best Prediction of the Additive Genomic Variance in Random-Effects Models. Schreck N; Piepho HP; Schlather M Genetics; 2019 Oct; 213(2):379-394. PubMed ID: 31383770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Joint linkage and linkage disequilibrium mapping of quantitative trait loci in natural populations. Wu R; Ma CX; Casella G Genetics; 2002 Feb; 160(2):779-92. PubMed ID: 11861578 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Efficiency of genomic selection using Bayesian multi-marker models for traits selected to reflect a wide range of heritabilities and frequencies of detected quantitative traits loci in mice. Kapell DN; Sorensen D; Su G; Janss LL; Ashworth CJ; Roehe R BMC Genet; 2012 May; 13():42. PubMed ID: 22651804 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Effectiveness of shrinkage and variable selection methods for the prediction of complex human traits using data from distantly related individuals. Berger S; Pérez-Rodríguez P; Veturi Y; Simianer H; de los Campos G Ann Hum Genet; 2015 Mar; 79(2):122-35. PubMed ID: 25600682 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Genetic linkage methods for quantitative traits. Amos CI; de Andrade M Stat Methods Med Res; 2001 Feb; 10(1):3-25. PubMed ID: 11329691 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Relevance of genetic relationship in GWAS and genomic prediction. Pereira HD; Soriano Viana JM; Andrade ACB; Fonseca E Silva F; Paes GP J Appl Genet; 2018 Feb; 59(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 29190011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Do Molecular Markers Inform About Pleiotropy? Gianola D; de los Campos G; Toro MA; Naya H; Schön CC; Sorensen D Genetics; 2015 Sep; 201(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 26205989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Marker genotyping error effects on genomic predictions under different genetic architectures. Akbarpour T; Ghavi Hossein-Zadeh N; Shadparvar AA Mol Genet Genomics; 2021 Jan; 296(1):79-89. PubMed ID: 32995954 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]