115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25942795)
21. Pediatric 99mTc-DMSA SPECT performed by using iterative reconstruction with isotropic resolution recovery: improved image quality and reduced radiopharmaceutical activity.
Sheehy N; Tetrault TA; Zurakowski D; Vija AH; Fahey FH; Treves ST
Radiology; 2009 May; 251(2):511-6. PubMed ID: 19304919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Noise correlation in PET, CT, SPECT and PET/CT data evaluated using autocorrelation function: a phantom study on data, reconstructed using FBP and OSEM.
Razifar P; Sandström M; Schnieder H; Långström B; Maripuu E; Bengtsson E; Bergström M
BMC Med Imaging; 2005 Aug; 5():5. PubMed ID: 16122383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Is iterative reconstruction an alternative to filtered backprojection in routine processing of dopamine transporter SPECT studies?
Koch W; Hamann C; Welsch J; Pöpperl G; Radau PE; Tatsch K
J Nucl Med; 2005 Nov; 46(11):1804-11. PubMed ID: 16269593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Half-time SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging with attenuation correction.
Ali I; Ruddy TD; Almgrahi A; Anstett FG; Wells RG
J Nucl Med; 2009 Apr; 50(4):554-62. PubMed ID: 19289436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Evaluating image reconstruction methods for tumor detection in 3-dimensional whole-body PET oncology imaging.
Lartizien C; Kinahan PE; Swensson R; Comtat C; Lin M; Villemagne V; Trébossen R
J Nucl Med; 2003 Feb; 44(2):276-90. PubMed ID: 12571221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Merging molecular and anatomical information: a feasibility study on rodents using microPET and MRI.
Guo WY; Lee JJ; Lin MH; Yang CC; Chen CL; Huang YH; Tyan YS; Wu TH
Nucl Med Commun; 2007 Oct; 28(10):804-12. PubMed ID: 17728611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A modified OSEM algorithm for PET reconstruction using wavelet processing.
Lee NY; Choi Y
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2005 Dec; 80(3):236-45. PubMed ID: 16274838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison among Reconstruction Algorithms for Quantitative Analysis of
Shi X; Li N; Ding H; Dang Y; Hu G; Liu S; Cui J; Zhang Y; Li F; Zhang H; Huo L
Contrast Media Mol Imaging; 2018; 2018():9193403. PubMed ID: 29681784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Accuracy of Resolution Recovery in PSF-based Fully-3D PET Image Reconstruction: Simulation and Phantom Study in Multicenter Trial].
Kangai Y; Odajima S; Matsutomo N; Kamiya T; Mizuta T; Onishi H
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2016 Mar; 72(3):209-17. PubMed ID: 27000669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Performance measurement of PSF modeling reconstruction (True X) on Siemens Biograph TruePoint TrueV PET/CT.
Lee YS; Kim JS; Kim KM; Kang JH; Lim SM; Kim HJ
Ann Nucl Med; 2014 May; 28(4):340-8. PubMed ID: 24504938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The influence of resolution recovery by using collimator detector response during 3D OSEM image reconstruction on (99m)Tc-ECD brain SPET images.
Kalantari F; Rajabi H; Ay MR; Razavi-Ratki SK; Fard-Esfahani A; Beiki D; Eftekhari M; Fallahi B; Sadeghian L; Emami-Ardekani A
Hell J Nucl Med; 2012; 15(2):92-7. PubMed ID: 22741145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Image reconstruction using filtered backprojection and iterative method: effect on motion artifacts in myocardial perfusion SPECT.
Zakavi SR; Zonoozi A; Kakhki VD; Hajizadeh M; Momennezhad M; Ariana K
J Nucl Med Technol; 2006 Dec; 34(4):220-3. PubMed ID: 17146110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Compressed sensing for reduction of noise and artefacts in direct PET image reconstruction.
Richter D; Basse-Lüsebrink TC; Kampf T; Fischer A; Israel I; Schneider M; Jakob PM; Samnick S
Z Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 24(1):16-26. PubMed ID: 23756331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Quantitative comparison of OSEM and penalized likelihood image reconstruction using relative difference penalties for clinical PET.
Ahn S; Ross SG; Asma E; Miao J; Jin X; Cheng L; Wollenweber SD; Manjeshwar RM
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Aug; 60(15):5733-51. PubMed ID: 26158503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Accuracy of 3-dimensional reconstruction algorithms for the high-resolution research tomograph.
van Velden FH; Kloet RW; van Berckel BN; Lammertsma AA; Boellaard R
J Nucl Med; 2009 Jan; 50(1):72-80. PubMed ID: 19091902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Towards guidelines to harmonize textural features in PET: Haralick textural features vary with image noise, but exposure-invariant domains enable comparable PET radiomics.
Prenosil GA; Weitzel T; Fürstner M; Hentschel M; Krause T; Cumming P; Rominger A; Klaeser B
PLoS One; 2020; 15(3):e0229560. PubMed ID: 32176698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Task-oriented quantitative image reconstruction in emission tomography for single- and multi-subject studies.
Verhaeghe J; Gravel P; Reader AJ
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Dec; 55(23):7263-85. PubMed ID: 21081825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Quantitative comparison of analytic and iterative reconstruction methods in 2- and 3-dimensional dynamic cardiac 18F-FDG PET.
Lubberink M; Boellaard R; van der Weerdt AP; Visser FC; Lammertsma AA
J Nucl Med; 2004 Dec; 45(12):2008-15. PubMed ID: 15585474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Non-isotropic noise correlation in PET data reconstructed by FBP but not by OSEM demonstrated using auto-correlation function.
Razifar P; Lubberink M; Schneider H; Långström B; Bengtsson E; Bergström M
BMC Med Imaging; 2005 May; 5(1):3. PubMed ID: 15892891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of image quality with 62Cu and 64Cu-labeled radiotracers in positron emission tomography whole-body phantom imaging.
Kobayashi M; Mori T; Tsujikawa T; Ogai K; Sugama J; Kiyono Y; Kawai K; Okazawa H
Hell J Nucl Med; 2015; 18(2):103-7. PubMed ID: 26187208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
