149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25943041)
21. Independent predictors of acute appendicitis on CT with pathologic correlation.
Ives EP; Sung S; McCue P; Durrani H; Halpern EJ
Acad Radiol; 2008 Aug; 15(8):996-1003. PubMed ID: 18620120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of multislice computed tomography and clinical scores for diagnosing acute appendicitis.
Liu W; Wei Qiang J; Xun Sun R
J Int Med Res; 2015 Jun; 43(3):341-9. PubMed ID: 25762518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Intravenous and Oral Contrast vs Intravenous Contrast Alone Computed Tomography for the Visualization of Appendix and Diagnosis of Appendicitis in Adult Emergency Department Patients.
Wadhwani A; Guo L; Saude E; Els H; Lang E; McRae A; Bhayana D
Can Assoc Radiol J; 2016 Aug; 67(3):234-41. PubMed ID: 27318889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Suspected appendicitis in children: rectal and intravenous contrast-enhanced versus intravenous contrast-enhanced CT.
Kharbanda AB; Taylor GA; Bachur RG
Radiology; 2007 May; 243(2):520-6. PubMed ID: 17456874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Ultrasound, computed tomography, and laboratory findings in the diagnosis of appendicitis.
Johansson EP; Rydh A; Riklund KA
Acta Radiol; 2007 Apr; 48(3):267-73. PubMed ID: 17453494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The use of the clinical scoring system by Alvarado in the decision to perform computed tomography for acute appendicitis in the ED.
McKay R; Shepherd J
Am J Emerg Med; 2007 Jun; 25(5):489-93. PubMed ID: 17543650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Interpretation of computed tomography does not correlate with laboratory or pathologic findings in surgically confirmed acute appendicitis.
Weyant MJ; Eachempati SR; Maluccio MA; Rivadeneira DE; Grobmyer SR; Hydo LJ; Barie PS
Surgery; 2000 Aug; 128(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 10922984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Accuracy of nonfocused helical CT for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: a 5-year review.
Raman SS; Lu DS; Kadell BM; Vodopich DJ; Sayre J; Cryer H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Jun; 178(6):1319-25. PubMed ID: 12034591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Acute appendicitis: comparison of helical CT diagnosis focused technique with oral contrast material versus nonfocused technique with oral and intravenous contrast material.
Jacobs JE; Birnbaum BA; Macari M; Megibow AJ; Israel G; Maki DD; Aguiar AM; Langlotz CP
Radiology; 2001 Sep; 220(3):683-90. PubMed ID: 11526267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Rapid CT diagnosis of acute appendicitis with IV contrast material.
Mun S; Ernst RD; Chen K; Oto A; Shah S; Mileski WJ
Emerg Radiol; 2006 Mar; 12(3):99-102. PubMed ID: 16362812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The diagnosis of acute appendicitis in a pediatric population: to CT or not to CT.
Stephen AE; Segev DL; Ryan DP; Mullins ME; Kim SH; Schnitzer JJ; Doody DP
J Pediatr Surg; 2003 Mar; 38(3):367-71; discsussion 367-71. PubMed ID: 12632351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Acute appendicitis in adults: Diagnostic accuracy of emergency doctors in a university hospital in Hong Kong.
Leung YK; Chan CP; Graham CA; Rainer TH
Emerg Med Australas; 2017 Feb; 29(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 28147464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Conventional and hydrocolonic US of the appendix with CT correlation performed by on-call radiology residents.
Kan JH; Fines BP; Funaki B
Acad Radiol; 2001 Dec; 8(12):1208-14. PubMed ID: 11770917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Radiological support for diagnosis of acute appendicitis: use, effectiveness and clinical repercussions].
Aranda-Narváez JM; Montiel-Casado MC; González-Sánchez AJ; Jiménez-Mazure C; Valle-Carbajo M; Sánchez-Pérez B; Santoyo-Santoyo J
Cir Esp; 2013 Nov; 91(9):574-8. PubMed ID: 23827923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Accuracy of ultrasound exam performed by emergency medicine versus radiology residents in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.
Shahbazipar M; Seyedhosseini J; Vahidi E; Motahar Vahedi HS; Jahanshir A
Eur J Emerg Med; 2019 Aug; 26(4):272-276. PubMed ID: 29438133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparative assessment of CT and sonographic techniques for appendiceal imaging.
Wise SW; Labuski MR; Kasales CJ; Blebea JS; Meilstrup JW; Holley GP; LaRusso SA; Holliman J; Ruggiero FM; Mauger D
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Apr; 176(4):933-41. PubMed ID: 11264081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. CT in the evaluation of nontraumatic abdominal pain in pregnant women.
Lazarus E; Mayo-Smith WW; Mainiero MB; Spencer PK
Radiology; 2007 Sep; 244(3):784-90. PubMed ID: 17709829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Low-dose CT for patients with clinically suspected acute appendicitis: optimal strength of sinogram affirmed iterative reconstruction for image quality and diagnostic performance.
Kim SH; Yoon JH; Lee JH; Lim YJ; Kim OH; Ryu JH; Son JH
Acta Radiol; 2015 Aug; 56(8):899-907. PubMed ID: 25118330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Suspected acute appendicitis: nonenhanced helical CT in 300 consecutive patients.
Lane MJ; Liu DM; Huynh MD; Jeffrey RB; Mindelzun RE; Katz DS
Radiology; 1999 Nov; 213(2):341-6. PubMed ID: 10551210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Suspected acute appendicitis: is ultrasonography or computed tomography the preferred imaging technique?
Pickuth D; Heywang-Köbrunner SH; Spielmann RP
Eur J Surg; 2000 Apr; 166(4):315-9. PubMed ID: 10817330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
