197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25943565)
21. Statistical significance of variables driving systematic variation in high-dimensional data.
Chung NC; Storey JD
Bioinformatics; 2015 Feb; 31(4):545-54. PubMed ID: 25336500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Stability selection for mixed effect models with large numbers of predictor variables: A simulation study.
Hyde R; O'Grady L; Green M
Prev Vet Med; 2022 Sep; 206():105714. PubMed ID: 35843027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. WilcoxCV: an R package for fast variable selection in cross-validation.
Boulesteix AL
Bioinformatics; 2007 Jul; 23(13):1702-4. PubMed ID: 17495999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Prediction-based variable selection for component-wise gradient boosting.
Potts S; Bergherr E; Reinke C; Griesbach C
Int J Biostat; 2024 May; 20(1):293-314. PubMed ID: 38000054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Regularization for generalized additive mixed models by likelihood-based boosting.
Groll A; Tutz G
Methods Inf Med; 2012; 51(2):168-77. PubMed ID: 22378253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Model-based boosting in high dimensions.
Hothorn T; Bühlmann P
Bioinformatics; 2006 Nov; 22(22):2828-9. PubMed ID: 16940323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Macromolecular crowding: chemistry and physics meet biology (Ascona, Switzerland, 10-14 June 2012).
Foffi G; Pastore A; Piazza F; Temussi PA
Phys Biol; 2013 Aug; 10(4):040301. PubMed ID: 23912807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Evaluation of variable selection methods for random forests and omics data sets.
Degenhardt F; Seifert S; Szymczak S
Brief Bioinform; 2019 Mar; 20(2):492-503. PubMed ID: 29045534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. SurvBoost: An R Package for High-Dimensional Variable Selection in the Stratified Proportional Hazards Model via Gradient Boosting.
Morris E; He K; Li Y; Li Y; Kang J
R J; 2020 Jun; 12(1):105-117. PubMed ID: 34094592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The lasso--a novel method for predictive covariate model building in nonlinear mixed effects models.
Ribbing J; Nyberg J; Caster O; Jonsson EN
J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2007 Aug; 34(4):485-517. PubMed ID: 17516152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. An improved variable selection procedure for adaptive Lasso in high-dimensional survival analysis.
He K; Wang Y; Zhou X; Xu H; Huang C
Lifetime Data Anal; 2019 Jul; 25(3):569-585. PubMed ID: 30478713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Deselection of base-learners for statistical boosting-with an application to distributional regression.
Strömer A; Staerk C; Klein N; Weinhold L; Titze S; Mayr A
Stat Methods Med Res; 2022 Feb; 31(2):207-224. PubMed ID: 34882438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Controlling false positive selections in high-dimensional regression and causal inference.
Bühlmann P; Rütimann P; Kalisch M
Stat Methods Med Res; 2013 Oct; 22(5):466-92. PubMed ID: 22116340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Knockoff boosted tree for model-free variable selection.
Jiang T; Li Y; Motsinger-Reif AA
Bioinformatics; 2021 May; 37(7):976-983. PubMed ID: 32966559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. MEBoost: Variable selection in the presence of measurement error.
Brown B; Weaver T; Wolfson J
Stat Med; 2019 Jul; 38(15):2705-2718. PubMed ID: 30856279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Flexible boosting of accelerated failure time models.
Schmid M; Hothorn T
BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Jun; 9():269. PubMed ID: 18538026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Simultaneous clustering and variable selection: A novel algorithm and model selection procedure.
Yuan S; De Roover K; Van Deun K
Behav Res Methods; 2023 Aug; 55(5):2157-2174. PubMed ID: 36085542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Identifying differentially expressed genes using false discovery rate controlling procedures.
Reiner A; Yekutieli D; Benjamini Y
Bioinformatics; 2003 Feb; 19(3):368-75. PubMed ID: 12584122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Class-imbalanced subsampling lasso algorithm for discovering adverse drug reactions.
Ahmed I; Pariente A; Tubert-Bitter P
Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Mar; 27(3):785-797. PubMed ID: 27114328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Estimating the false discovery rate using nonparametric deconvolution.
van de Wiel MA; Kim KI
Biometrics; 2007 Sep; 63(3):806-15. PubMed ID: 17825012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
