These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25944290)

  • 1. Influence of F0 and Sequence Length of Audio and Electroglottographic Signals on Perturbation Measures for Voice Assessment.
    Hohm J; Döllinger M; Bohr C; Kniesburges S; Ziethe A
    J Voice; 2015 Jul; 29(4):517.e11-21. PubMed ID: 25944290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy of Acoustic Analysis Measurements in the Evaluation of Patients With Different Laryngeal Diagnoses.
    Lopes LW; Batista Simões L; Delfino da Silva J; da Silva Evangelista D; da Nóbrega E Ugulino AC; Oliveira Costa Silva P; Jefferson Dias Vieira V
    J Voice; 2017 May; 31(3):382.e15-382.e26. PubMed ID: 27742492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reliable jitter and shimmer measurements in voice clinics: the relevance of vowel, gender, vocal intensity, and fundamental frequency effects in a typical clinical task.
    Brockmann M; Drinnan MJ; Storck C; Carding PN
    J Voice; 2011 Jan; 25(1):44-53. PubMed ID: 20381308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reliable acoustic measurements in children between 5;0 and 9;11 years: Gender, age, height and weight effects on fundamental frequency, jitter and shimmer in phonations without and with controlled voice SPL.
    Brockmann-Bauser M; Beyer D; Bohlender JE
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Dec; 79(12):2035-42. PubMed ID: 26412461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical relevance of speaking voice intensity effects on acoustic jitter and shimmer in children between 5;0 and 9;11 years.
    Brockmann-Bauser M; Beyer D; Bohlender JE
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2014 Dec; 78(12):2121-6. PubMed ID: 25441603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Acoustic parameters for the evaluation of voice quality in patients with voice disorders.
    Li G; Hou Q; Zhang C; Jiang Z; Gong S
    Ann Palliat Med; 2021 Jan; 10(1):130-136. PubMed ID: 33440977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Acoustic comparison of vowel sounds among adult females.
    Franca MC
    J Voice; 2012 Sep; 26(5):671.e9-17. PubMed ID: 22285451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Variations across time in acoustic and electroglottographic measures of phonatory function in women with and without vocal nodules.
    Hall KD
    J Speech Hear Res; 1995 Aug; 38(4):783-93. PubMed ID: 7474972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Integrating voice evaluation: correlation between acoustic and audio-perceptual measures.
    Vaz Freitas S; Melo Pestana P; Almeida V; Ferreira A
    J Voice; 2015 May; 29(3):390.e1-7. PubMed ID: 25619471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Digital analysis of the acoustic signal in vocal pathology diagnosis. Sensitivity and specificity of shimmer and jitter measurements].
    Preciado JA; Fernández S
    Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp; 1998; 49(6):475-81. PubMed ID: 9830224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cepstral analysis of hypokinetic and ataxic voices: correlations with perceptual and other acoustic measures.
    Jannetts S; Lowit A
    J Voice; 2014 Nov; 28(6):673-80. PubMed ID: 24836365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perturbation measurements in untrained male voices' transitions from modal to falsetto register.
    Echternach M; Sundberg J; Zander MF; Richter B
    J Voice; 2011 Nov; 25(6):663-9. PubMed ID: 20488660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Diplophonia Disturbs Jitter and Shimmer Measurement.
    Aichinger P; Hagmüller M; Roesner I; Bigenzahn W; Schneider-Stickler B; Schoentgen J
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2016; 68(1):22-8. PubMed ID: 27439009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Voice outcomes after transoral laser microsurgery for early glottic cancer-considering signal type and smoothed cepstral peak prominence.
    Stone D; McCabe P; Palme CE; Heard R; Eastwood C; Riffat F; Madill C
    J Voice; 2015 May; 29(3):370-81. PubMed ID: 25301299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Acoustic measures and self-reports of vocal fatigue by female teachers.
    Laukkanen AM; Ilomäki I; Leppänen K; Vilkman E
    J Voice; 2008 May; 22(3):283-9. PubMed ID: 17134877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Analysis on voice acoustic parameters and electroglottographic parameters in normal children of Han, Naxi, Bai nationality].
    Zhao SQ; Zhang TS; Lin JY; Zhou LJ; Liu RQ
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2000 Jul; 14(7):311-4. PubMed ID: 12563883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relationship between subjective voice complaints and acoustic parameters in female teachers' voices.
    Rantala L; Vilkman E
    J Voice; 1999 Dec; 13(4):484-95. PubMed ID: 10622515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validity of jitter measures in non-quasi-periodic voices. Part II: the effect of noise.
    Manfredi C; Giordano A; Schoentgen J; Fraj S; Bocchi L; Dejonckere P
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2011 Jul; 36(2):78-89. PubMed ID: 21609247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Acoustic voice analysis: reliability of a set of multi-dimensional parameters].
    González J; Cervera T; Miralles JL
    Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp; 2002 Apr; 53(4):256-68. PubMed ID: 12185903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perturbation measures of voice: a comparative study between Multi-Dimensional Voice Program and Praat.
    Maryn Y; Corthals P; De Bodt M; Van Cauwenberge P; Deliyski D
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2009; 61(4):217-26. PubMed ID: 19590221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.