These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25944356)

  • 1. Quantitative evaluation of apically extruded debris with Twisted File Adaptive instruments in straight root canals: reciprocation with different angles, adaptive motion and continuous rotation.
    Karataş E; Arslan H; Kırıcı DÖ; Alsancak M; Çapar ID
    Int Endod J; 2016 Apr; 49(4):382-5. PubMed ID: 25944356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of apically extruded debris after root canal instrumentation using Reciproc(®) instruments with various kinematics.
    Arslan H; Doğanay E; Alsancak M; Çapar ID; Karataş E; Gündüz HA
    Int Endod J; 2016 Mar; 49(3):307-10. PubMed ID: 25809717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of Apically Extruded Debris Using Continuous Rotation, Reciprocation, or Adaptive Motion.
    Sen OG; Bilgin B; Koçak S; Sağlam BC; Koçak MM
    Braz Dent J; 2018; 29(3):245-248. PubMed ID: 29972449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Incidence of Dentinal Cracks after Root Canal Preparation with Twisted File Adaptive Instruments Using Different Kinematics.
    Karataş E; Arslan H; Alsancak M; Kırıcı DÖ; Ersoy İ
    J Endod; 2015 Jul; 41(7):1130-3. PubMed ID: 25843752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Apically Extruded Debris in Curved Root Canals Using the WaveOne Gold Reciprocating and Twisted File Adaptive Systems.
    Boijink D; Costa DD; Hoppe CB; Kopper PMP; Grecca FS
    J Endod; 2018 Aug; 44(8):1289-1292. PubMed ID: 29908692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of apically extruded debris associated with several Ni-Ti systems.
    Üstün Y; Çanakçi BC; Dinçer AN; Er O; Düzgün S
    Int Endod J; 2015 Jul; 48(7):701-4. PubMed ID: 25112960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of Different Kinematics on Apical Extrusion of Irrigant and Debris during Canal Preparation Using K3XF Instruments.
    Toyoğlu M; Altunbaş D
    J Endod; 2017 Sep; 43(9):1565-1568. PubMed ID: 28735794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of coronal flaring on apical extrusion of debris during root canal instrumentation using single-file systems.
    Topçuoğlu HS; Üstün Y; Akpek F; Aktı A; Topçuoğlu G
    Int Endod J; 2016 Sep; 49(9):884-889. PubMed ID: 26283644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An in vitro comparison of apically extruded debris and instrumentation times with ProTaper Universal, ProTaper Next, Twisted File Adaptive, and HyFlex instruments.
    Capar ID; Arslan H; Akcay M; Ertas H
    J Endod; 2014 Oct; 40(10):1638-41. PubMed ID: 25260737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of Different Glide Path Files on Apical Debris Extrusion in Curved Root Canals.
    Gunes B; Yesildal Yeter K
    J Endod; 2018 Jul; 44(7):1191-1194. PubMed ID: 29884338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of Instrumentation Techniques and Kinematics on Apical Extrusion of Debris: An
    Haridas K; Hariharan M; Singh P; Varughese A; Ravi AB; Varma KR
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2019 Sep; 20(9):1067-1070. PubMed ID: 31797831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of a glide path on apical extrusion of debris during canal preparation using single-file systems in curved canals.
    Topçuoğlu HS; Düzgün S; Akpek F; Topçuoğlu G; Aktı A
    Int Endod J; 2016 Jun; 49(6):599-603. PubMed ID: 26084620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Apical extrusion of debris using self-adjusting file, reciprocating single-file, and 2 rotary instrumentation systems.
    Koçak S; Koçak MM; Sağlam BC; Türker SA; Sağsen B; Er Ö
    J Endod; 2013 Oct; 39(10):1278-80. PubMed ID: 24041391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Apical extrusion of debris in flat-oval root canals after using different instrumentation systems.
    Kirchhoff AL; Fariniuk LF; Mello I
    J Endod; 2015 Feb; 41(2):237-41. PubMed ID: 25447504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of apically extruded debris during root canal preparation in primary molar teeth using three different rotary systems and hand files.
    Topçuoğlu G; Topçuoğlu HS; Akpek F
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2016 Sep; 26(5):357-63. PubMed ID: 26538300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment of apically extruded debris and irrigant produced by different nickel-titanium instrument systems.
    Küçükyilmaz E; Savas S; Saygili G; Uysal B
    Braz Oral Res; 2015; 29():1-6. PubMed ID: 25387860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cyclic fatigue analysis of twisted file rotary NiTi instruments used in reciprocating motion.
    Gambarini G; Gergi R; Naaman A; Osta N; Al Sudani D
    Int Endod J; 2012 Sep; 45(9):802-6. PubMed ID: 22429241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of ProTaper Next and HyFlex instruments on apical debris extrusion in curved canals.
    Koçak MM; Çiçek E; Koçak S; Sağlam BC; Furuncuoğlu F
    Int Endod J; 2016 Oct; 49(10):996-1000. PubMed ID: 26383696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The influence of different angles and reciprocation on the shaping ability of two nickel-titanium rotary root canal instruments.
    Al-Sudani D; Kaabi H; Al Gamdi A; Al Dakheel A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2014 Jul; 15(4):451-5. PubMed ID: 25576112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of apically extruded debris and irrigant using different file systems.
    Kütük B; Akpınar KE; Altunbaş D
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2017 Dec; 20(12):1555-1560. PubMed ID: 29378986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.