These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25944916)

  • 1. Covariation Is a Poor Measure of Molecular Coevolution.
    Talavera D; Lovell SC; Whelan S
    Mol Biol Evol; 2015 Sep; 32(9):2456-68. PubMed ID: 25944916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reducing the false positive rate in the non-parametric analysis of molecular coevolution.
    Codoñer FM; O'Dea S; Fares MA
    BMC Evol Biol; 2008 Apr; 8():106. PubMed ID: 18402697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Detecting compensatory covariation signals in protein evolution using reconstructed ancestral sequences.
    Fukami-Kobayashi K; Schreiber DR; Benner SA
    J Mol Biol; 2002 Jun; 319(3):729-43. PubMed ID: 12054866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Analysis of covariation in an SH3 domain sequence alignment: applications in tertiary contact prediction and the design of compensating hydrophobic core substitutions.
    Larson SM; Di Nardo AA; Davidson AR
    J Mol Biol; 2000 Oct; 303(3):433-46. PubMed ID: 11031119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. New methods to measure residues coevolution in proteins.
    Gao H; Dou Y; Yang J; Wang J
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2011 May; 12():206. PubMed ID: 21612664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Contributions of residue pairing to beta-sheet formation: conservation and covariation of amino acid residue pairs on antiparallel beta-strands.
    Mandel-Gutfreund Y; Zaremba SM; Gregoret LM
    J Mol Biol; 2001 Feb; 305(5):1145-59. PubMed ID: 11162120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A novel method for detecting intramolecular coevolution: adding a further dimension to selective constraints analyses.
    Fares MA; Travers SA
    Genetics; 2006 May; 173(1):9-23. PubMed ID: 16547113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Coevolving protein residues: maximum likelihood identification and relationship to structure.
    Pollock DD; Taylor WR; Goldman N
    J Mol Biol; 1999 Mar; 287(1):187-98. PubMed ID: 10074416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Extracting phylogenetic dimensions of coevolution reveals hidden functional signals.
    Colavin A; Atolia E; Bitbol AF; Huang KC
    Sci Rep; 2022 Jan; 12(1):820. PubMed ID: 35039514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Base pairing constraints drive structural epistasis in ribosomal RNA sequences.
    Dutheil JY; Jossinet F; Westhof E
    Mol Biol Evol; 2010 Aug; 27(8):1868-76. PubMed ID: 20211929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Coevolution in defining the functional specificity.
    Chakrabarti S; Panchenko AR
    Proteins; 2009 Apr; 75(1):231-40. PubMed ID: 18831050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative analysis of sequence covariation methods to mine evolutionary hubs: examples from selected GPCR families.
    Pelé J; Moreau M; Abdi H; Rodien P; Castel H; Chabbert M
    Proteins; 2014 Sep; 82(9):2141-56. PubMed ID: 24677372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Using analyses of amino Acid coevolution to understand protein structure and function.
    Ashenberg O; Laub MT
    Methods Enzymol; 2013; 523():191-212. PubMed ID: 23422431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Intramolecular allosteric communication in dopamine D2 receptor revealed by evolutionary amino acid covariation.
    Sung YM; Wilkins AD; Rodriguez GJ; Wensel TG; Lichtarge O
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2016 Mar; 113(13):3539-44. PubMed ID: 26979958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Context dependence and coevolution among amino acid residues in proteins.
    Wang ZO; Pollock DD
    Methods Enzymol; 2005; 395():779-90. PubMed ID: 15865995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An analysis of simultaneous variation in protein structures.
    Chelvanayagam G; Eggenschwiler A; Knecht L; Gonnet GH; Benner SA
    Protein Eng; 1997 Apr; 10(4):307-16. PubMed ID: 9194155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Regional covariation and its application for predicting protein contact patches.
    Xu Y; Tillier ER
    Proteins; 2010 Feb; 78(3):548-58. PubMed ID: 19768681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Structural Determinants of Intra-Protein Compensatory Substitutions.
    Chaurasia S; Dutheil JY
    Mol Biol Evol; 2022 Apr; 39(4):. PubMed ID: 35349721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evolutionary rate covariation is a reliable predictor of co-functional interactions but not necessarily physical interactions.
    Little J; Chikina M; Clark NL
    Elife; 2024 Feb; 12():. PubMed ID: 38415754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Identification of coevolving residues and coevolution potentials emphasizing structure, bond formation and catalytic coordination in protein evolution.
    Little DY; Chen L
    PLoS One; 2009; 4(3):e4762. PubMed ID: 19274093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.