These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25945777)

  • 1. Low-shrinkage composites: an in vitro evaluation of sealing ability after occlusal loading.
    Barceleiro MO; Soares GM; Espindola O; Kahn S; Pola Poiate IA; Sampaio Filho HR
    Gen Dent; 2015; 63(3):e36-40. PubMed ID: 25945777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Polymerization shrinkage of different types of composite resins and microleakage with and without liner in class II cavities.
    Karaman E; Ozgunaltay G
    Oper Dent; 2014; 39(3):325-31. PubMed ID: 24147747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative evaluation of marginal adaptation and microleakage of low-shrinking composites after thermocycling and mechanical loading.
    Hepdeniz OK; Ermis RB
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2019 May; 22(5):633-641. PubMed ID: 31089017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Leakage pathway of Class V cavities restored with different flowable resin composite restorations.
    Awliya WY; El-Sahn AM
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 18335730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Microleakage evaluation of Silorane-based composite and methacrylate-based composite in class II box preparations using two different layering techniques: an in vitro study.
    Joseph A; Santhosh L; Hegde J; Panchajanya S; George R
    Indian J Dent Res; 2013; 24(1):148. PubMed ID: 23852255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Microleakage of nanofilled resin-modified glass-ionomer/silorane- or methacrylate-based composite sandwich Class II restoration: effect of simultaneous bonding.
    Shafiei F; Akbarian S
    Oper Dent; 2014; 39(1):E22-30. PubMed ID: 23865583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of the cervical integrity during occlusal loading of Class II restorations.
    Campos PE; Barceleiro Mde O; Sampaio-Filho HR; Martins LR
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 18335734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of cyclical lateral forces on microleakage in cervical resin composite restorations.
    Fruits TJ; VanBrunt CL; Khajotia SS; Duncanson MG
    Quintessence Int; 2002 Mar; 33(3):205-12. PubMed ID: 11921769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Marginal integrity and secondary caries of selectively excavated teeth in vitro.
    Schwendicke F; Kern M; Blunck U; Dörfer C; Drenck J; Paris S
    J Dent; 2014 Oct; 42(10):1261-8. PubMed ID: 25132367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fracture resistance of premolar teeth restored with silorane-based or dimethacrylate-based composite resins.
    Akbarian G; Ameri H; Chasteen JE; Ghavamnasiri M
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2014; 26(3):200-7. PubMed ID: 24103086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. SEM and microleakage evaluation of the marginal integrity of two types of class V restorations with or without the use of a light-curable coating material and of polishing.
    Magni E; Zhang L; Hickel R; Bossù M; Polimeni A; Ferrari M
    J Dent; 2008 Nov; 36(11):885-91. PubMed ID: 18757129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Microleakage of Class II restorations and microtensile bond strength to dentin of low-shrinkage composites.
    Juloski J; Carrabba M; Aragoneses JM; Forner L; Vichi A; Ferrari M
    Am J Dent; 2013 Oct; 26(5):271-7. PubMed ID: 24479279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In Vitro Evaluation of Marginal Adaptation of Direct Class II Composite Restorations Made of Different "Low-Shrinkage" Systems.
    Shahidi C; Krejci I; Dietschi D
    Oper Dent; 2017; 42(3):273-283. PubMed ID: 28467259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reducing microleakage in composite resin restorations: an in vitro study.
    Unlu N; Krakaya S; Ozer F; Say EC
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2003 Dec; 11(4):171-5. PubMed ID: 14737794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Three-year clinical evaluation of different restorative resins in class I restorations.
    Yazici AR; Ustunkol I; Ozgunaltay G; Dayangac B
    Oper Dent; 2014; 39(3):248-55. PubMed ID: 24754716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Measurement of the internal adaptation of resin composites using micro-CT and its correlation with polymerization shrinkage.
    Kim HJ; Park SH
    Oper Dent; 2014; 39(2):E57-70. PubMed ID: 24111809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of flowable liner and margin location on microleakage of conventional and packable class II resin composites.
    Tredwin CJ; Stokes A; Moles DR
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 15765955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of occlusal loading on the microleakage of class V restorations.
    Arisu HD; Uçtasli MB; Eligüzeloglu E; Ozcan S; Omürlü H
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(2):135-41. PubMed ID: 18435186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Margin quality and microleakage of Class II composite resin restorations.
    Lui JL; Masutani S; Setcos JC; Lutz F; Swartz ML; Phillips RW
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1987 Jan; 114(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 3468167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Marginal adaptation of direct class II composite restorations with different cavity liners.
    Pecie R; Onisor I; Krejci I; Bortolotto T
    Oper Dent; 2013; 38(6):E210-20. PubMed ID: 23713806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.